AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

CORE STATE Navi 22
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2600 MHz
TDP 250 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

CORE STATE AD106
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1695 MHz
TDP 115 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,548
N/A
geekbench_metal
137,249
N/A
geekbench_opencl
16,360
109,197
geekbench_vulkan
98,089
108,367
passmark_directx_10
125
116
passmark_directx_11
180
179
passmark_directx_12
80
85
passmark_directx_9
263
223
passmark_g2d
972
763
passmark_g3d
20,700
19,587
passmark_gpu_compute
9,550
8,399

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT represent two distinct approaches to high-performance graphics, with the former being a modern, power-efficient mobile solution and the latter a larger, desktop-oriented card. Benchmark data reveals a split decision: the NVIDIA GPU dominates in compute-oriented and modern API workloads, while the AMD card shows its strength in legacy DirectX tests and traditional rasterization. This analysis breaks down the head-to-head results, architectural differences, and practical implications for each GPU.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result in the dataset is the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile's overwhelming victory in the Geekbench OpenCL test. The NVIDIA card scores 109,197 points against the AMD card's 16,360 points, a differential of 567.5%. This is not a marginal win; it is a category-defining gap that suggests the RTX 4070 Mobile's compute architecture is fundamentally better suited to this type of general-purpose GPU workload. In contrast, the Geekbench Vulkan test is far closer, with the NVIDIA card winning 108,367 to 98,089, a 10.5% advantage.

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT claims the majority of the PassMark test wins, taking 6 out of 9 head-to-head benchmarks. Its most decisive victory comes in the DirectX 9 test, where it scores 263 against the NVIDIA card's 223, a 15.2% lead. The AMD card also wins the G2D test (972 vs 763, a 21.5% edge) and the GPU Compute test (9,550 vs 8,399, a 12.1% advantage). In the crucial PassMark G3D test, which often reflects overall gaming performance, the AMD card leads with 20,700 points versus 19,587 points for the NVIDIA card, a 5.4% margin.

However, the NVIDIA card is not without its own PassMark victories. It wins the DirectX 12 test with a score of 85 against AMD's 80, a 6.3% difference. The DirectX 11 and DirectX 10 tests are extremely close, with the AMD card winning by only 0.6% (180 vs 179) and 7.2% (125 vs 116), respectively. These results indicate that while the AMD card has a slight edge in older API performance, the NVIDIA card is more competitive in the most modern DirectX 12 workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has a higher average benchmark score of 27,435, compared to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT's 26,011. This places the NVIDIA card in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, while the AMD card sits in the 71st percentile.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Mobile compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile's average score of 27,435 puts it nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, which scores 27,425 (a 0% delta). It is 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, which scores 27,565, and 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell.

Q: What is the performance difference in the Geekbench Vulkan test?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile wins the Vulkan test with a score of 108,367, which is 10.5% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT's score of 98,089.

Q: Which card wins the PassMark G3D test?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT wins the PassMark G3D test with a score of 20,700, which is 5.4% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile's score of 19,587.

Q: How does the RX 6750 XT fare against its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD card's average score of 26,011 is 0.5% higher than the AMD Radeon R9 M395X and 0.6% higher than the AMD FirePro W7100. It is also 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile uses the AD106 chip based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. This advanced node allows for a compact die size of 188 mm² that houses 22,900 million transistors, resulting in a high transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, in contrast, uses the Navi 22 chip based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on TSMC's older 7 nm process. This results in a much larger die size of 335 mm² containing 17,200 million transistors, with a lower density of 51.3M per mm².

These architectural choices lead to significant differences in core configuration. The NVIDIA card features 4,608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs. It also includes 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, which are absent in the AMD card's specification. The AMD card has fewer shading units at 2,560 but more texture mapping units (160) and ROPs (64), along with 40 RT cores. The memory subsystems also differ: the NVIDIA card uses an 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the AMD card offers 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s.

Power consumption and physical design are starkly contrasted. The RTX 4070 Mobile is a mobile-integrated GPU (IGP) with a TDP of 115 W and no power connectors or dedicated slot width. The RX 6750 XT is a dual-slot desktop card with a 250 W TDP, requiring a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector and a 600 W suggested PSU. The AMD card is physically larger, measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the choice between these two GPUs depends heavily on the target workload. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the clear winner in compute performance, as demonstrated by its 567.5% lead in Geekbench OpenCL and its 10.5% advantage in Vulkan. It also has a higher average benchmark score (27,435 vs 26,011) and holds the edge in DirectX 12 performance.

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, however, shows its strength in legacy and traditional graphics workloads. It wins the PassMark G3D test by 5.4% and the DirectX 9 test by 15.2%, indicating better performance in older games and standard rasterization scenarios. The AMD card also excels in the G2D and GPU Compute tests, suggesting advantages in 2D applications and certain compute tasks.

The production status is also a factor: the NVIDIA card is listed as "Active," while the AMD card is "End-of-life." For users prioritizing modern API performance, compute capabilities, and a current production status, the RTX 4070 Mobile is the data-backed choice. For those focused on direct rasterization performance in existing titles, the RX 6750 XT's benchmark wins make it a compelling option, despite its older status.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every core specification. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile uses a 5 nm process, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT uses a 7 nm process. The NVIDIA card has a higher transistor count (22,900 million vs 17,200 million) but a smaller die size (188 mm² vs 335 mm²). Clock speeds vary significantly: the AMD card has a base clock of 2150 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, while the NVIDIA card runs at 1395 MHz base and 1695 MHz boost.

Memory configurations are distinct, with the NVIDIA card offering 8 GB on a 128-bit bus versus the AMD card's 12 GB on a 192-bit bus. The AMD card provides higher memory bandwidth (432.0 GB/s vs 256.0 GB/s) and faster effective memory speed (18 Gbps vs 16 Gbps). Compute capabilities differ, with the NVIDIA card delivering 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 and 15.62 TFLOPS FP16, while the AMD card provides 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 and 26.62 TFLOPS FP16. Power requirements are drastically different: the NVIDIA card consumes 115 W, while the AMD card consumes 250 W and requires external power connectors. The bus interface also differs, with the NVIDIA card using PCIe 4.0 x8 and the AMD card using PCIe 4.0 x16.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile wins in compute-heavy and modern API scenarios. Its 567.5% lead in Geekbench OpenCL makes it the obvious choice for general-purpose GPU compute tasks. The 10.5% Vulkan victory suggests better performance in Vulkan-based games and applications. The 6.3% DirectX 12 win indicates a forward-looking advantage for the latest games. The higher average benchmark score and 73rd percentile ranking also point to overall superiority in mixed workloads.

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT wins in legacy and traditional graphics workloads. Its 15.2% DirectX 9 lead and 5.4% PassMark G3D advantage make it the stronger performer for older games and standard 3D rendering. The 21.5% win in the G2D test indicates better 2D performance. The 12.1% GPU Compute win suggests it handles certain compute tasks more efficiently. The AMD card's 12 GB memory capacity and higher bandwidth (432.0 GB/s) provide a tangible advantage in memory-intensive scenarios, even if the benchmark suite does not isolate this directly. The RX 6750 XT also wins the DirectX 10 and DirectX 11 tests, albeit by slim margins of 7.2% and 0.6%, respectively, showing competitiveness across the DirectX spectrum.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 6750 XT
RTX 4070 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
4,608 +80.0%
Shaders
2,560
4,608 +80.0%
TMUs
160
144 -10.0%
ROPs
64
48 -25.0%
Compute Units
40
—
SM Count
—
36
Clocks
Base Clock
2150 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
1695 MHz
Game Clock
2495 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
8,192 -33.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
192 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
432.0 GB/s
256.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
3 MB
32 MB
L3 Cache
96 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
166.4 GPixel/s
81.36 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
416.0 GTexel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
13.31 TFLOPS
15.62 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
832.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
244.1 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
26.62 TFLOPS (2:1)
15.62 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
40
36 -10.0%
Tensor Cores
—
144
Power
TDP
250 W
115 W
TDP (W)
250
115 -54.0%
Suggested PSU
600 W
—
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Navi 22
AD106
Generation
Navi II (RX 6000)
GeForce 40 Mobile
Process Size
7 nm
5 nm
Transistors
17,200 million
22,900 million
Die Size
335 mm²
188 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
51.3M / mm²
121.8M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
8.9
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
—
Height
110 mm 4.3 inches
—
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
549 USD
—
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Navi
GeForce 30 Mobile
Successor
Navi III
GeForce 50 Mobile
View Radeon RX 6750 XT Details View GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile Details