AMD Radeon RX 570X vs AMD Radeon RX 7700 Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7700 and AMD Radeon RX 570X sit at opposite ends of AMD’s GPU timeline. The RX 7700 is an active RDNA 3.0 part from the RX 7000 series, while the RX 570X is an end-of-life GCN 4.0 product from the Polaris generation. The benchmark database shows a decisive performance gap, but the architectural differences explain why the newer card dominates so thoroughly.

The Verdict

The data points to a single conclusion: the AMD Radeon RX 7700 outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 570X in every recorded benchmark. Across three head-to-head tests, the RX 7700 wins all three, with deltas ranging from 60.8% to 990.7%. The average benchmark score for the RX 7700 is 15852, compared to 13871 for the RX 570X, a difference of roughly 14%. The percentile rankings reinforce this: the RX 7700 sits at the 58th percentile among all GPUs, while the RX 570X sits at the 55th percentile.

The RX 570X is not a viable choice for modern workloads. Its best recorded result, a Passmark G3D score of 1923, is less than one-tenth of the RX 7700’s 20974. Even in the Passmark G2D test, which measures 2D graphics performance rather than 3D rendering, the RX 7700 leads by 60.8%. The RX 570X was released in 2018 and is now end-of-life, which explains its absence from newer DirectX 12 benchmark suites. The RX 7700, released in 2025, remains active and supports the latest API features.

For users with existing RX 570X hardware, the upgrade path is unambiguous. The RX 7700 delivers a 990.7% improvement in Passmark G3D, which translates to roughly 10.9 times the raw 3D performance. No other conclusion is supported by the recorded data.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs share a manufacturer but almost nothing else. The RX 7700 uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The RX 570X uses the Polaris 20 chip with GCN 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. The process node difference alone, 5 nm versus 14 nm, accounts for a substantial portion of the efficiency and density gap.

The transistor counts tell the story. The RX 7700 packs 28,100 million transistors into a 346 mm² die, yielding a density of 81.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The RX 570X contains 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die, for a density of 24.6 million per square millimeter. The newer chip crams nearly 5 times more transistors into only 1.5 times the die area. This density advantage enables the RX 7700 to deliver 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, versus 5.095 TFLOPS for the RX 570X, a 4.9 times raw compute advantage.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The RX 7700 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 570X uses 8 GB of GDDR5 on the same 256-bit bus, but bandwidth falls to 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock difference is stark: 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) for the RX 7700 versus 1750 MHz (7 Gbps effective) for the RX 570X. The newer card also doubles the memory capacity, which matters for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

Compute unit resources scale similarly. The RX 7700 has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The RX 570X has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The ROP count is particularly telling: 96 versus 32, a 3 times difference that directly impacts pixel fill rate. The RX 7700 achieves 236.1 GPixel/s, while the RX 570X manages 39.81 GPixel/s. Texture rate follows the same pattern: 393.4 GTexel/s versus 159.2 GTexel/s.

Ray tracing support is exclusive to the RX 7700, which includes 40 dedicated RT cores. The RX 570X has no RT cores, as GCN 4.0 predates AMD’s ray tracing hardware. DirectX support differs as well: the RX 7700 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the RX 570X is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0). Vulkan support is slightly newer on the RX 7700 (version 1.4 versus 1.3), and OpenGL is identical at 4.6.

Power and connectivity also show generational progress. The RX 7700 has a 200 W TDP with dual 8-pin power connectors and a suggested 550 W PSU. The RX 570X has a 150 W TDP with a single 6-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The RX 7700 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RX 570X uses PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs differ: the RX 7700 offers HDMI 2.1a, two DisplayPort 2.1, and a USB Type-C port; the RX 570X offers DVI, HDMI 2.0b, and three DisplayPort 1.4a ports.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7700 wins every recorded benchmark, but the margin varies by workload. The Passmark G3D test shows the largest gap at 990.7%, indicating that the RX 7700 is overwhelmingly faster in 3D rendering tasks. This test typically stresses shader throughput, texture fill, and pixel processing, all areas where the RX 7700 has massive hardware advantages: 2560 versus 2048 shading units, 160 versus 128 TMUs, and 96 versus 32 ROPs.

The Geekbench OpenCL test shows a 172.3% advantage for the RX 7700. This benchmark exercises general-purpose compute, and the RX 7700’s 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance versus 5.095 TFLOPS explains the roughly 2.7 times improvement. The RX 570X’s FP16 performance is also 1:1 with FP32, but the absolute numbers are far lower.

The Passmark G2D test shows the smallest gap at 60.8%. This test measures 2D graphics operations like window management, bitmap blits, and basic desktop rendering. The RX 570X’s 750 score is not embarrassing here; it reflects the fact that 2D workloads are less demanding on raw compute resources. Still, the RX 7700’s 1206 score demonstrates that even this lighter workload benefits from the newer architecture.

For the RX 570X, there are no benchmark wins to highlight. Its only competitive advantage in the recorded data is its smaller physical footprint: 241 mm length versus 267 mm for the RX 7700. It also requires less power (150 W versus 200 W) and a smaller PSU (450 W versus 550 W), which could matter in legacy systems with older power supplies. However, these are not performance wins; they are compatibility considerations.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RX 7700 in 3D rendering?

A: The Passmark G3D score for the RX 7700 is 20974, compared to 1923 for the RX 570X. This represents a 990.7% improvement, meaning the RX 7700 delivers roughly 10.9 times the 3D performance.

Q: Does the RX 570X support ray tracing?

A: No. The RX 570X has no ray tracing cores. The RX 7700 includes 40 RT cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The RX 570X predates AMD’s ray tracing hardware.

Q: What are the memory capacity differences?

A: The RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the RX 570X has 8 GB of GDDR5. Both use a 256-bit bus, but the RX 7700’s bandwidth is 624.1 GB/s versus 224.0 GB/s for the RX 570X.

Q: Which card has better compute performance?

A: The RX 7700 achieves 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 5.095 TFLOPS for the RX 570X. In the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark, the RX 7700 scores 106028 versus 38939, a 172.3% advantage.

Q: Is the RX 570X still in production?

A: No. The RX 570X is marked as end-of-life. The RX 7700 is marked as active and was released in September 2025, while the RX 570X was released in April 2018.

Q: What API level does each card support?

A: The RX 7700 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 570X supports DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. Both support OpenGL 4.6.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic result is the Passmark G3D test. The RX 7700 scores 20974, while the RX 570X scores 1923. The delta is 990.7%, the largest margin in the entire comparison. This test represents sustained 3D rendering workloads, and the difference is stark enough that the RX 570X appears to be from a different product category entirely. The RX 7700’s 96 ROPs versus 32 ROPs, combined with 624.1 GB/s versus 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, explains why the newer card dominates pixel-heavy scenes.

The Geekbench OpenCL test shows a 172.3% advantage for the RX 7700. The scores are 106028 for the RX 7700 and 38939 for the RX 570X. This benchmark measures OpenCL compute throughput, which relies heavily on shading unit count and clock speed. The RX 7700 runs at a boost clock of 2459 MHz, while the RX 570X boosts to 1244 MHz. Combined with 2560 versus 2048 shading units, the compute advantage compounds. The RX 7700’s FP32 throughput of 25.18 TFLOPS is nearly 5 times the RX 570X’s 5.095 TFLOPS, which aligns with the observed 2.7 times score improvement (the benchmark also factors in memory and driver efficiency).

The Passmark G2D test shows a 60.8% lead for the RX 7700. Scores are 1206 versus 750. This is the smallest margin, and it makes sense: 2D workloads are typically not compute-bound. The RX 570X’s 14 nm process and GCN 4.0 architecture are still capable of basic 2D operations. However, the RX 7700’s higher memory bandwidth and faster clock speeds still yield a meaningful advantage. For office work, web browsing, or video playback, the RX 570X remains functional, but the RX 7700 is measurably better.

Across all three tests, the RX 7700 wins 3 and the RX 570X wins 0. The average benchmark score for the RX 7700 is 15852, which places it near the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862, -0.1%) and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16014, -1%). The RX 570X’s average of 13871 places it near the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (13821, 0.4%) and the AMD Radeon 660M (13812, 0.4%). These rival comparisons put the two cards in entirely different performance tiers. The RX 7700 competes with modern mid-range GPUs, while the RX 570X sits alongside integrated graphics and older mobile parts.

The RX 7700 also has more headroom in its feature set. It supports PCIe 4.0, which doubles the bandwidth of the RX 570X’s PCIe 3.0 interface. Display outputs include DisplayPort 2.1, which supports higher resolutions and refresh rates than the RX 570X’s DisplayPort 1.4a. The USB Type-C port on the RX 7700 enables modern VR headset connectivity, a feature absent from the RX 570X.

In summary, the recorded data leaves no ambiguity. The RX 7700 is a modern, active GPU with 16 GB of memory, RDNA 3.0 efficiency, and ray tracing support. The RX 570X is a legacy part with 8 GB of memory, GCN 4.0 architecture, and no ray tracing. Every benchmark confirms the RX 7700’s superiority, with margins that range from substantial to overwhelming.