AMD Radeon RX 570X vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT Comparison

# AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT vs AMD Radeon RX 570X

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT and AMD Radeon RX 570X are two GPUs from entirely different eras of AMD's mobile and desktop lineup. The RX 7600M XT is a modern RDNA 3.0 part built for laptops, while the RX 570X is a GCN 4.0 desktop card that is now end-of-life. The benchmark data shows a massive generational gap, with the RX 7600M XT winning every head-to-head test by a wide margin, yet the RX 570X actually holds a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs due to the limited benchmark sample. This comparison highlights how architectural progress and power efficiency have reshaped performance expectations.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins in raw 3D performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT dominates the PassMark G3D test with a score of 13,907 versus the RX 570X's 1,923, a delta of 623.2%. This is the single largest performance gap in the head-to-head comparison.

Q: How do the two compare in compute workloads?

A: The RX 7600M XT scores 74,869 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 92.3% higher than the RX 570X's 38,939. The RX 7600M XT also delivers 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 performance compared to 5.095 TFLOPS on the RX 570X.

Q: What is the architecture difference between them?

A: The RX 7600M XT uses RDNA 3.0 on a 6 nm TSMC process with 13,300 million transistors, while the RX 570X uses GCN 4.0 on a 14 nm GlobalFoundries process with 5,700 million transistors.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The RX 7600M XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the RX 570X is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0). The RX 7600M XT also has Vulkan 1.4 support versus Vulkan 1.3 on the RX 570X.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 7600M XT has 288.0 GB/s bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The RX 570X has 224.0 GB/s from 8 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Is the RX 570X still in production?

A: No, the RX 570X is marked as end-of-life with a release date of April 10, 2018. The RX 7600M XT is active, released on January 3, 2023.

Architecture Differences

The architectural chasm between these two GPUs is stark. The RX 7600M XT is built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish," using a 6 nm process at TSMC. It packs 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². In contrast, the RX 570X uses GCN 4.0 architecture with the Polaris 20 chip, fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It contains 5,700 million transistors on a larger 232 mm² die, resulting in a much lower density of 24.6 million per mm².

The RX 7600M XT features 32 ray tracing cores, a capability entirely absent from the RX 570X. Both GPUs have 2,048 shading units and 128 texture mapping units, but the RX 7600M XT doubles the render output units to 64 versus 32 on the RX 570X. This directly impacts pixel throughput: the RX 7600M XT achieves 158.0 GPixel/s against 39.81 GPixel/s on the RX 570X. Texture rate follows a similar pattern, with 316.0 GTexel/s versus 159.2 GTexel/s.

Clock speeds tell a story of efficiency gains. The RX 7600M XT has a base clock of 1280 MHz, a game clock of 2023 MHz, and a boost of 2469 MHz. The RX 570X runs at 1168 MHz base and 1244 MHz boost. Despite the RX 7600M XT running faster and delivering nearly 4x the FP32 throughput (20.23 TFLOPS vs 5.095 TFLOPS), it consumes less power at 120 W TDP versus 150 W for the RX 570X. The RX 7600M XT also supports FP16 at 40.45 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RX 570X is limited to 5.095 TFLOPS at 1:1.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The RX 7600M XT uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding 288.0 GB/s. The RX 570X uses 8 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus at 1750 MHz (7 Gbps effective), providing 224.0 GB/s. The RX 7600M XT achieves higher bandwidth with half the bus width, demonstrating the efficiency of newer memory technology.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are overwhelmingly one-sided. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 7600M XT scores 74,869 against the RX 570X's 38,939, a 92.3% advantage. This reflects the massive compute throughput difference, driven by higher clocks, more efficient architecture, and better memory bandwidth.

The PassMark G2D test shows a narrower but still clear win: the RX 7600M XT scores 894 versus 750, a 19.2% lead. This 2D performance gap is modest compared to 3D workloads, suggesting the RX 570X retains some capability in basic desktop operations despite its age.

PassMark G3D delivers the most dramatic result. The RX 7600M XT scores 13,907, which is 623.2% higher than the RX 570X's 1,923. This is not a close contest by any measure. The RX 7600M XT's 64 ROPs, ray tracing cores, and modern shader design produce a level of 3D performance that the GCN-based RX 570X simply cannot approach.

The RX 7600M XT wins all three head-to-head benchmarks, with 3 wins and 0 losses. The average benchmark score reflects this: the RX 7600M XT averages 12,710 across its test suite, while the RX 570X averages 13,871. Interestingly, the RX 570X has a higher average score because its benchmark set includes only three tests, two of which are skewed by the G2D result. The RX 7600M XT's broader test suite includes more demanding workloads that drag its average down.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The RX 7600M XT uses a 6 nm process node, while the RX 570X uses 14 nm. Transistor count is 13,300 million versus 5,700 million, and die size is 204 mm² versus 232 mm². The RX 7600M XT has a much higher transistor density at 65.2M per mm² compared to 24.6M per mm².

Clock speeds diverge significantly: the RX 7600M XT has base/boost clocks of 1280/2469 MHz, while the RX 570X has 1168/1244 MHz. The RX 7600M XT also has a game clock of 2023 MHz, a feature the RX 570X lacks entirely. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) on the RX 7600M XT versus 1750 MHz (7 Gbps effective) on the RX 570X.

Memory type differs: GDDR6 on the RX 7600M XT versus GDDR5 on the RX 570X. Bus width is 128-bit versus 256-bit, but bandwidth favors the RX 7600M XT at 288.0 GB/s versus 224.0 GB/s. Pixel rate is 158.0 GPixel/s versus 39.81 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 316.0 GTexel/s versus 159.2 GTexel/s.

The RX 7600M XT has 32 RT cores; the RX 570X has none. FP32 throughput is 20.23 TFLOPS versus 5.095 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 40.45 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 5.095 TFLOPS (1:1). TDP is lower on the RX 7600M XT at 120 W versus 150 W. The RX 7600M XT is an IGP with no power connectors, while the RX 570X is a dual-slot card requiring a 1x 6-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU.

Bus interface differs: PCIe 4.0 x16 on the RX 7600M XT versus PCIe 3.0 x16 on the RX 570X. Display outputs are portable-device-dependent on the RX 7600M XT, while the RX 570X offers 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0b, and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RX 570X has a physical length of 241 mm (9.5 inches), while the RX 7600M XT has no listed dimensions. API support differs: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus 12 (12_0), and Vulkan 1.4 versus 1.3. Production status is Active versus End-of-life, and the release dates are January 3, 2023 versus April 10, 2018.

The Verdict

The data leaves no room for ambiguity: the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is categorically superior to the AMD Radeon RX 570X in every measured benchmark. The 623.2% lead in PassMark G3D is the clearest signal—this is not an incremental improvement but a generational leap. The RX 7600M XT achieves this while consuming 30 W less power, operating as an IGP, and fitting into a mobile form factor. For anyone choosing between these two, the RX 7600M XT is the only rational pick based on performance data.

However, the RX 570X holds a higher percentile rank (55th versus 52nd) and a higher average benchmark score (13,871 versus 12,710). This is a statistical artifact of the limited benchmark set available for the RX 570X, which includes only Geekbench OpenCL, PassMark G2D, and PassMark G3D. The RX 7600M XT's average includes additional tests like 3DMark Steel Nomad and multiple PassMark DirectX versions, which pull its average down. The RX 570X's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, with deltas of 0.4% and 0.9% respectively, indicating its average score sits in a competitive band. The RX 7600M XT's rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 and Tesla K20Xm, with deltas of -0.5% and 0.7%.

Practically speaking, the RX 7600M XT is the clear winner for any modern workload. Its ray tracing support, higher Vulkan version, and massive compute advantage make it suitable for contemporary games and compute tasks. The RX 570X is a legacy product with no ray tracing, lower API support, and performance that trails by an order of magnitude in 3D workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600M XT wins in every category where both have comparable data. In Geekbench OpenCL, it leads by 92.3%, making it the stronger choice for compute-heavy applications like rendering, machine learning inference, and general GPGPU workloads. The 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 40.45 TFLOPS FP16 throughput provide a solid foundation for such tasks. Its 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, despite a narrower 128-bit bus, ensures data movement keeps pace with the shader cores.

In 3D gaming and graphics, the RX 7600M XT's 623.2% lead in PassMark G3D is decisive. The 64 ROPs and 32 RT cores enable higher resolutions, better anti-aliasing, and ray-traced effects that the RX 570X cannot handle. The RX 7600M XT also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which unlocks features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading in compatible titles. Its boost clock of 2469 MHz and game clock of 2023 MHz ensure sustained performance under load.

The RX 570X does have one narrow advantage: 2D performance. In PassMark G2D, it trails by only 19.2%, and its 750 score is respectable for desktop tasks. The RX 570X also offers more physical display outputs (1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a) compared to the RX 7600M XT's portable-device-dependent outputs. This makes the RX 570X more flexible for multi-monitor desktop setups, though its 241 mm length and dual-slot design require more physical space.

For power-constrained systems, the RX 7600M XT wins decisively with a 120 W TDP and no power connectors, making it suitable for thin laptops. The RX 570X needs a 150 W TDP, a 6-pin connector, and a 450 W PSU, limiting it to desktop builds with adequate power delivery. The RX 7600M XT also uses PCIe 4.0, doubling the bandwidth of the RX 570X's PCIe 3.0 interface, which matters for data-intensive workloads.

The RX 570X's only real claim to relevance is its 256-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, which were competitive in 2018 but are now outpaced by the RX 7600M XT's narrower but faster GDDR6 implementation. Its 5,700 million transistor count and 232 mm² die are larger than the RX 7600M XT's 204 mm², but the newer chip achieves more with less silicon area. In short, the RX 7600M XT wins on every meaningful performance metric, while the RX 570X retains only niche advantages in legacy display connectivity and 2D tasks.