AMD Radeon RX 570X vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 Comparison

# AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs AMD Radeon RX 570X

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 and AMD Radeon RX 570X represent two distinct eras of AMD graphics, separated by five years of architectural evolution. The data shows a decisive generational leap: the RX 7600 wins all three shared benchmark comparisons, with margins ranging from a substantial 31.2% in 2D workloads to a staggering 765% in DirectX 12-era gaming performance. The RX 570X, an end-of-life Polaris part from 2018, retains relevance only in legacy scenarios, while the RX 7600 establishes itself as a modern 1080p contender with ray tracing support and a 57th percentile standing across all GPUs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic divergence appears in PassMark G3D, where the RX 7600 scores 16,634 against the RX 570X's 1,923. That is a 765% advantage, the largest delta in the shared test suite. This is not a marginal improvement; it is a complete paradigm shift in rasterization throughput. The RX 7600's pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s versus 39.81 GPixel/s for the RX 570X explains much of this gap, as does the former's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute against the latter's 5.095 TFLOPS. In practical terms, the RX 7600 delivers over four times the theoretical compute and pixel throughput, which translates directly into the benchmark's 8.65x score advantage.

Geekbench OpenCL tells a similar story, though with a smaller relative margin. The RX 7600 posts 88,051 points against 38,939 for the RX 570X, a 126.1% improvement. This compute-oriented benchmark benefits from the RX 7600's RDNA 3.0 architecture, which doubles the FP32 throughput via its 2048 shading units operating at a 2655 MHz boost clock. The RX 570X's 2048 shading units, while equal in count, run at a modest 1244 MHz boost and lack the architectural efficiency of RDNA 3.0. The result is a workload that shows the RX 7600 completing compute tasks in less than half the time.

The narrowest win comes in PassMark G2D, a test of 2D graphics and desktop compositing performance. Here the RX 7600 scores 984 versus 750 for the RX 570X, a 31.2% edge. This smaller delta reflects that 2D workloads are less dependent on raw shader throughput and more on memory bandwidth and driver efficiency. The RX 7600's 288.0 GB/s GDDR6 bandwidth versus 224.0 GB/s GDDR5 for the RX 570X provides the margin, though the 128-bit bus of the RX 7600 versus the 256-bit bus of the RX 570X narrows the gap. Still, the newer card wins decisively in every metric the data captures.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600 is the clear victor in every shared benchmark, but the nature of its wins defines distinct use cases. For modern gaming, particularly DirectX 12 Ultimate titles, the RX 7600 is the only viable choice between the two. Its 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support includes hardware ray tracing via 32 dedicated RT cores, a feature entirely absent from the RX 570X, which tops out at DirectX 12 (12_0). The RX 7600 also supports Vulkan 1.4 against the RX 570X's Vulkan 1.3, ensuring compatibility with newer graphics APIs.

For compute-intensive workloads such as OpenCL acceleration, the RX 7600's 126.1% lead in Geekbench OpenCL makes it the obvious pick. Its 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 1:1 FP16 ratio allow it to handle scientific simulations, video encoding, and machine learning inference tasks that would cripple the RX 570X. The RX 570X's 5.095 TFLOPS FP32, while respectable for 2018, places it in a different performance class entirely.

The RX 570X does retain one theoretical advantage: its 256-bit memory bus. This wider interface, combined with 8 GB of GDDR5, provides lower latency per access than the RX 7600's 128-bit bus, even though the latter's higher clocked GDDR6 delivers more aggregate bandwidth. In memory-latency-sensitive legacy applications, the RX 570X may exhibit fewer stutters, though the data does not include benchmarks to confirm this. The RX 570X also draws 150 W TDP versus 165 W for the RX 7600, a modest 15 W difference that could matter in extremely constrained power envelopes, though both require a 450 W suggested PSU.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two GPUs is generational. The RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process, packing 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die. The RX 570X uses the Polaris 20 chip on GlobalFoundries' 14 nm process, with 5,700 million transistors on a larger 232 mm² die. This translates to a transistor density of 65.2M per mm² for the RX 7600 versus 24.6M per mm² for the RX 570X — a 2.65x density advantage that enables the RX 7600 to fit over twice the transistors in a smaller package.

The RX 7600's RDNA 3.0 architecture represents a complete departure from the RX 570X's Graphics Core Next (GCN) 4.0 design. RDNA 3.0 introduces a chiplet-like design philosophy (though Navi 33 is monolithic) with improved wavefront scheduling and a unified L2 cache hierarchy. The RX 7600 doubles the render output units to 64 versus 32 on the RX 570X, while maintaining 128 texture mapping units on both. Shading units remain at 2048, but the RX 7600's dual-issue FP32 design allows each shader to execute two operations per clock, effectively doubling throughput.

Memory technology differs fundamentally. The RX 7600 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 at 18 Gbps effective, achieving 288.0 GB/s across a 128-bit bus. The RX 570X uses 8 GB of GDDR5 at 7 Gbps effective, achieving 224.0 GB/s across a 256-bit bus. While the RX 570X's wider bus provides more physical memory channels, the RX 7600's faster GDDR6 compensates with 28.6% higher bandwidth. Both cards feature 8 GB capacity, but the newer memory type allows the RX 7600 to operate at higher clock speeds with lower power per bit.

Connectivity and features also diverge sharply. The RX 7600 supports PCIe 4.0 x8, while the RX 570X uses PCIe 3.0 x16. In practice, the RX 7600's x8 link on PCIe 4.0 offers equivalent bandwidth to PCIe 3.0 x16, but newer platforms benefit from reduced lane usage. Display outputs favor the RX 7600 with 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting higher refresh rates and resolutions than the RX 570X's 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0b, and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RX 7600 also includes 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, a feature class that did not exist when the RX 570X launched.

The Verdict

The benchmark data leaves no ambiguity: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 570X in every measured category, with wins of 31.2%, 126.1%, and 765% across G2D, OpenCL, and G3D tests respectively. The RX 7600's average benchmark score of 15,171 places it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 570X's 13,871 average places it in the 55th percentile. This narrow percentile gap is misleading, as the RX 570X's average is buoyed by fewer benchmark submissions, while the RX 7600's score reflects a broader and more demanding test suite.

For gamers, the choice is unambiguous. The RX 7600's DirectX 12 Ultimate support, hardware ray tracing, and 765% G3D advantage make it the only card capable of running modern titles at playable frame rates. The RX 570X, with its DirectX 12 (12_0) ceiling and no ray tracing, is limited to older or less demanding games. Its 1,923 G3D score places it in territory where even esports titles may require reduced settings.

For compute users, the RX 7600's 126.1% OpenCL lead and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it suitable for GPU-accelerated workloads, while the RX 570X's 5.095 TFLOPS is adequate only for light or legacy tasks. The RX 7600's 1:1 FP16 ratio and newer Vulkan 1.4 support future-proof it for emerging compute frameworks.

The RX 570X's only non-performance advantages are its 150 W TDP (15 W lower than the RX 7600), its 256-bit memory bus, and its longer 241 mm PCB (versus 204 mm for the RX 7600). These are negligible for most users. The RX 570X is end-of-life, while the RX 7600 remains active in production. The verdict is clear: select the RX 7600 for any new build or upgrade, reserving the RX 570X only for legacy systems requiring its specific PCIe 3.0 or DVI output capabilities.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw compute performance?

A: The RX 7600 delivers 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 against the RX 570X's 5.095 TFLOPS, a 4.27x advantage that drives its 126.1% lead in Geekbench OpenCL.

Q: Do both cards support hardware ray tracing?

A: No. The RX 7600 includes 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, while the RX 570X has none. The RX 7600 also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), whereas the RX 570X is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0).

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RX 7600 achieves 288.0 GB/s with 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, while the RX 570X achieves 224.0 GB/s with 8 GB GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus. The RX 7600 has 28.6% more bandwidth.

Q: Which card is more power-efficient?

A: Despite a 165 W TDP versus 150 W for the RX 570X, the RX 7600 delivers vastly higher performance per watt. Its 6 nm process and RDNA 3.0 architecture enable 21.75 TFLOPS from a 15 W higher power draw.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the RX 570X wins?

A: In the shared head-to-head tests (Geekbench OpenCL, PassMark G2D, PassMark G3D), the RX 7600 wins all three. The RX 570X has no benchmark victories in the data.

Q: What are the production statuses of these cards?

A: The RX 7600 is listed as Active production, while the RX 570X is End-of-life. The RX 7600 was released on 2023-05-24, compared to the RX 570X's 2018-04-10 release.