AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

CORE STATE Navi 10
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1980 MHz
TDP 225 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 1.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2019
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

TITAN RTX

CORE STATE TU102
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1770 MHz
TDP 280 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2018

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_metal
88,292
N/A
geekbench_opencl
77,161
144,858
geekbench_vulkan
74,281
136,073
passmark_directx_10
98
147
passmark_directx_11
116
189
passmark_directx_12
66
88
passmark_directx_9
219
223
passmark_g2d
941
860
passmark_g3d
16,437
20,491
passmark_gpu_compute
7,923
10,034
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
3,794

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the NVIDIA TITAN RTX and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is decisively one-sided. Across nine recorded head-to-head tests, the TITAN RTX wins eight, with the AMD card claiming a single narrow victory. The average benchmark score tells the same story: the TITAN RTX posts 31,676 against 26,553 for the Radeon, a lead of roughly 19.3%. The percentile rankings reinforce this gap, with the TITAN RTX sitting at the 76th percentile of all GPUs and the AMD card at the 72nd.

The largest margin comes in compute-oriented workloads. In Geekbench OpenCL, the TITAN RTX scores 144,858 against 77,161 for the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, a delta of 87.7%. This means the NVIDIA card is nearly 88% faster in raw compute throughput, a massive advantage that reflects the underlying hardware differences. Vulkan performance follows a similar pattern: 136,073 versus 74,281, a gap of 83.2%. For any workload that leans on general-purpose GPU compute, the TITAN RTX is in a different performance class entirely.

DirectX benchmarks also favor the NVIDIA card, though with varying margins. In DirectX 11, the TITAN RTX scores 189 versus 116, a 62.9% advantage. DirectX 10 shows a 50% lead, with scores of 147 and 98. DirectX 12 narrows the gap somewhat: 88 against 66, still a 33.3% win for the TITAN RTX. Even DirectX 9, the oldest API tested, goes to NVIDIA, but only by 1.8% (223 versus 219), showing that legacy titles barely separate the two.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test is only recorded for the TITAN RTX, which scores 3,794, so no direct comparison exists in the database. The PassMark G3D score, a more general 3D gaming measure, gives the TITAN RTX a 24.7% edge: 20,491 versus 16,437. PassMark GPU Compute also favors NVIDIA, with 10,034 versus 7,923, a 26.6% margin.

The AMD card's sole head-to-head win comes in PassMark G2D, a 2D graphics throughput test. Here the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 941 against 860, a delta of -8.6% relative to the TITAN RTX. This is a narrow victory in a niche metric, and it does little to offset the overall performance deficit.

Where Each One Wins

The performance split is clear: the NVIDIA TITAN RTX dominates everywhere except 2D rendering. For compute-heavy tasks, the TITAN RTX is the obvious choice. Its 87.7% lead in OpenCL and 83.2% lead in Vulkan make it markedly superior for scientific computing, machine learning inference, and any workload that can leverage massive parallel throughput. The 26.6% advantage in PassMark GPU Compute reinforces this conclusion.

For gaming, the TITAN RTX also holds the edge, but the margins are smaller. The 24.7% lead in PassMark G3D is substantial, and DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 show 62.9% and 33.3% advantages respectively. The DirectX 9 result, a 1.8% gap, suggests that older games barely differentiate the two, but modern API titles clearly favor NVIDIA.

The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary's only win is in PassMark G2D, which measures 2D graphics operations like desktop rendering and basic image manipulation. An 8.6% advantage here is unlikely to matter for most users, as 2D workloads are rarely a bottleneck on modern GPUs. The AMD card also posts a higher PassMark G2D score in absolute terms, 941 versus 860, but the overall pattern is one of narrow relevance.

For users prioritizing compute, AI, or high-end gaming, the TITAN RTX wins decisively. For users who only care about 2D desktop performance, the Radeon card has a small edge, but this is a marginal use case. The data does not support any other scenario where the AMD card comes out ahead.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA TITAN RTX has an average benchmark score of 31,676, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26,553. The TITAN RTX sits at the 76th percentile of all GPUs, compared to the 72nd percentile for the AMD card.

Q: How large is the TITAN RTX's lead in compute performance?

A: In Geekbench OpenCL, the TITAN RTX scores 144,858 versus 77,161 for the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, an 87.7% advantage. In Vulkan, the gap is 83.2%, with scores of 136,073 and 74,281 respectively.

Q: Does the AMD card win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary wins PassMark G2D, scoring 941 against 860 for the TITAN RTX, a delta of -8.6%. This is a 2D graphics throughput test and is the only head-to-head test the AMD card wins.

Q: What is the DirectX 12 performance difference?

A: In PassMark DirectX 12, the TITAN RTX scores 88 while the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 66, giving NVIDIA a 33.3% advantage.

Q: How do the two compare in legacy DirectX 9 titles?

A: The TITAN RTX scores 223 in PassMark DirectX 9, only 1.8% higher than the Radeon's 219. This is the closest margin in any head-to-head test.

Q: Which GPU has better raw 3D rendering performance?

A: The TITAN RTX leads in PassMark G3D with 20,491 against 16,437 for the AMD card, a 24.7% advantage.

Specification Differences

The TITAN RTX uses the TU102 chip on a 12 nm process, while the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary uses the Navi 10 chip on a 7 nm process. Both are manufactured by TSMC. The TITAN RTX has 18,600 million transistors on a 754 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 24.7 million per mm². The AMD card has 10,300 million transistors on a 251 mm² die, with a density of 41.0 million per mm². The smaller process node gives AMD a much higher density despite fewer total transistors.

Memory specifications differ substantially. The TITAN RTX has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both run memory at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective for each.

Clock speeds favor the AMD card. The Radeon's base clock is 1680 MHz with a boost of 1980 MHz and a game clock of 1830 MHz. The TITAN RTX has a base of 1350 MHz and a boost of 1770 MHz, with no listed game clock. The TITAN RTX's higher core count compensates: it has 4,608 shading units, 288 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, versus 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs for the AMD card.

The TITAN RTX also includes 72 ray tracing cores and 576 tensor cores, while the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary has none. Pixel and texture rates reflect the core differences: the TITAN RTX reaches 169.9 GPixel/s and 509.8 GTexel/s, versus 126.7 GPixel/s and 316.8 GTexel/s for the AMD card. FP32 performance is 16.31 TFLOPS for NVIDIA and 10.14 TFLOPS for AMD, with FP16 at 32.62 and 20.28 TFLOPS respectively, both at a 2:1 ratio.

Power and connectivity differ as well. The TITAN RTX has a 280 W TDP, requiring a 600 W suggested PSU and 2x 8-pin connectors. The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary has a 225 W TDP, a 550 W suggested PSU, and 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin connectors. Both are dual-slot cards, but the TITAN RTX is 267 mm long, 116 mm high, and 35 mm wide, while the AMD card is 272 mm long, 111 mm high, and 40 mm wide.

The bus interface also differs: the TITAN RTX uses PCIe 3.0 x16, while the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are similar, with both offering 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x HDMI, but the TITAN RTX adds a USB Type-C port and uses HDMI 2.0, while the AMD card uses HDMI 2.0b. The TITAN RTX supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the AMD card is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from fundamentally different architectures. The TITAN RTX is built on NVIDIA's Turing architecture, part of the GeForce 20 generation. The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary uses AMD's RDNA 1.0 architecture, part of the Radeon RX 5000 series, which is Navi-based.

The Turing architecture in the TITAN RTX includes dedicated ray tracing cores and tensor cores, which are absent from the RDNA 1.0 card. This gives the TITAN RTX hardware acceleration for ray-traced workloads and AI-accelerated tensor operations. The Radeon card has no equivalent hardware, relying on traditional shader-based processing.

The process node difference is significant. The TITAN RTX uses a 12 nm process, while the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary uses a 7 nm process. This explains the transistor density gap: 24.7 million per mm² for NVIDIA versus 41.0 million per mm² for AMD. The smaller node allows AMD to pack more transistors into a smaller die, but the TITAN RTX compensates with a much larger die and more total transistors.

The TITAN RTX's predecessor is the GeForce 10 series, and its successor is the GeForce 30 series. The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary's predecessor is Vega, and its successor is Navi II. Both cards are end-of-life in production status, with the TITAN RTX released on 2018-12-17 and the AMD card released on 2019-07-06.

The Verdict

The data points to one conclusion: the NVIDIA TITAN RTX is the superior performer in nearly every measurable category. Its 87.7% lead in OpenCL and 83.2% lead in Vulkan make it the clear choice for compute-heavy workloads. Its 24.7% advantage in PassMark G3D and 33.3% lead in DirectX 12 make it the stronger gaming card as well. The only benchmark the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary wins is PassMark G2D, a 2D throughput test, by 8.6%.

The TITAN RTX's advantages are rooted in its hardware: 4,608 shading units versus 2,560, 24 GB of memory versus 8 GB, and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 448.0 GB/s. The inclusion of 72 ray tracing cores and 576 tensor cores gives it capabilities the Radeon card simply lacks. Its 280 W TDP and larger physical footprint are the trade-offs for this performance.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary does offer meaningful benefits in specific areas. Its 7 nm process gives it a much higher transistor density, and its smaller die is more efficient in terms of power per transistor. Its 225 W TDP is lower, and it supports PCIe 4.0 x16, which the TITAN RTX does not. Its game clock of 1830 MHz is also higher than the TITAN RTX's boost clock of 1770 MHz.

For users who need maximum compute throughput, ray tracing, or tensor performance, the TITAN RTX is the only choice based on the recorded data. For users who prioritize 2D performance, lower power draw, or PCIe 4.0 support, the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary has specific advantages. The overall benchmark record, however, gives the TITAN RTX a clear and substantial victory across the vast majority of workloads.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
TITAN RTX
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
4,608 +80.0%
Shaders
2,560
4,608 +80.0%
TMUs
160
288 +80.0%
ROPs
64
96 +50.0%
Compute Units
40
—
SM Count
—
72
Clocks
Base Clock
1680 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
1770 MHz
Game Clock
1830 MHz
—
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
24,576 +200.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
384 bit
Bandwidth
448.0 GB/s
672.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
—
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
6 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
126.7 GPixel/s
169.9 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
316.8 GTexel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
10.14 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
633.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
509.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
20.28 TFLOPS (2:1)
32.62 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
—
72
Tensor Cores
—
576
Power
TDP
225 W
280 W
TDP (W)
225
280 +24.4%
Suggested PSU
550 W
600 W
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Turing
GPU Name
Navi 10
TU102
Generation
Navi (RX 5000)
GeForce 20
Process Size
7 nm
12 nm
Transistors
10,300 million
18,600 million
Die Size
251 mm²
754 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
41.0M / mm²
24.7M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
272 mm 10.7 inches
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
111 mm 4.4 inches
116 mm 4.6 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.03x DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
449 USD
2,499 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Vega
GeForce 10
Successor
Navi II
GeForce 30
View Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Details View TITAN RTX Details