AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 570

CORE STATE Polaris 20
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1244 MHz
TDP 150 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE GCN 4.0
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2017
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T1000 8 GB

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1395 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
880
N/A
geekbench_metal
39,349
N/A
geekbench_opencl
32,084
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
42,752
34,561

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only shared benchmark between the NVIDIA T1000 8 GB and the AMD Radeon RX 570 is Geekbench Vulkan, and the results are decisively in favor of the AMD card. The RX 570 scores 42,752 points, while the T1000 manages 34,561 points. This represents a 19.2% deficit for the NVIDIA card, a substantial margin in a compute-oriented API test. The data shows a clear win for AMD in this specific workload, indicating that the Polaris-based GPU holds a significant advantage in Vulkan compute performance.

However, the broader database context reveals a more nuanced picture. The T1000's average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 34,561, which places it in the 79th percentile of all GPUs. The RX 570's average score is lower, at 28,766, putting it in the 74th percentile. This discrepancy is interesting: despite losing the Vulkan head-to-head, the T1000 has a higher average score and percentile ranking. This suggests that the T1000 performs relatively better in other benchmark suites not shared between the two cards, such as OpenGL or DirectX workloads, where its architecture may excel.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each card further contextualizes their standings. The T1000's closest competitors in the database include the AMD Radeon HD 7970 (34,541, only 0.1% behind), the NVIDIA A2 (34,690, 0.4% ahead), and the NVIDIA TITAN V (34,355, 0.6% behind). These are remarkably tight margins, indicating that the T1000 sits in a densely packed performance cluster where tiny deltas separate cards from very different generations and market segments. In contrast, the RX 570's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28,874, 0.4% ahead), the AMD Radeon R9 M295X (28,580, 0.7% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28,996, 0.8% ahead). The RX 570's average score is actually lower than two of these rivals, reinforcing that its strong Vulkan showing is an outlier rather than a consistent trend across all workloads.

Architecture Differences

The fundamental architectural split between these two cards is stark. The NVIDIA T1000 is built on the Turing architecture (chip TU117) using a 12 nm process from TSMC, while the AMD Radeon RX 570 uses the GCN 4.0 architecture (chip Polaris 20) on a 14 nm process from GlobalFoundries. This generational gap is significant: Turing introduced features like dedicated ray tracing and tensor cores in higher-tier products, though the T1000 itself has no such cores listed in the database. GCN 4.0, meanwhile, is a mature, compute-heavy design that AMD refined for efficiency and throughput.

The transistor counts and die sizes tell a story of different design philosophies. The T1000 packs 4,700 million transistors into a 200 mm² die, resulting in a density of 23.5 million transistors per square millimeter. The RX 570 has more transistors overall, 5,700 million, but on a larger 232 mm² die, yielding a slightly higher density of 24.6 million per square millimeter. These numbers are close, but the architectural efficiency differs markedly. The T1000 achieves its performance with far fewer execution units: 896 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The RX 570 counter with 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The AMD card has more than twice the shader count and TMUs, which explains its raw compute advantage in certain workloads.

Clock speeds also diverge. The T1000 runs at a base clock of 1065 MHz and boosts to 1395 MHz, while the RX 570 has a higher base of 1168 MHz but a lower boost of 1244 MHz. This suggests the NVIDIA card has more headroom and a more aggressive boost behavior, potentially allowing it to sustain higher frequencies under load. The memory subsystems are entirely different as well: the T1000 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 160.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the RX 570 uses 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s. The RX 570's wider bus gives it a 40% bandwidth advantage, which is critical for memory-intensive tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data points to a clear split in use cases. The AMD Radeon RX 570 wins decisively in Vulkan compute, as evidenced by its 19.2% lead in the Geekbench Vulkan test. This makes it a stronger choice for applications that leverage Vulkan for general-purpose GPU compute, such as certain rendering engines, scientific simulations, or blockchain workloads. The RX 570's higher shader count and texture rate (159.2 GTexel/s versus 78.12 GTexel/s for the T1000) support this advantage, as these resources are directly utilized in compute-heavy tasks.

Conversely, the NVIDIA T1000's higher average benchmark score and superior percentile ranking (79th versus 74th) suggest it performs relatively better across a broader range of workloads, even if it loses the one direct comparison. This could be attributed to its Turing architecture, which brings improvements in instruction scheduling, cache hierarchy, and feature support. The T1000 supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.4, while the RX 570 supports DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. The newer API versions on the NVIDIA card may enable better optimization in modern software. Additionally, the T1000's significantly lower power draw (50 W versus 150 W) and single-slot design make it far more suitable for dense workstation environments or systems with limited power and space, where sustained performance per watt is a priority.

The T1000 also offers double the memory capacity (8 GB versus 4 GB), which is a decisive factor for workloads that exceed the RX 570's frame buffer, such as large datasets in data science or high-resolution texture sets in professional visualization. While the RX 570 has higher bandwidth, the T1000's larger capacity and newer GDDR6 memory type could provide better performance in memory-constrained scenarios.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification category. The process node is a clear split: 12 nm for the T1000 versus 14 nm for the RX 570, with the former using TSMC and the latter GlobalFoundries. Transistor counts are 4,700 million versus 5,700 million, and die sizes are 200 mm² versus 232 mm². Clock speeds show the T1000 with a lower base (1065 MHz) but higher boost (1395 MHz), while the RX 570 has a higher base (1168 MHz) and lower boost (1244 MHz). Memory configurations are vastly different: 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 160.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 4 GB GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The compute resources are heavily skewed toward the RX 570: 2,048 shading units versus 896, 128 TMUs versus 56, and identical 32 ROPs. This translates to a texture rate of 159.2 GTexel/s for the AMD card versus 78.12 GTexel/s for the NVIDIA card, and a pixel rate of 39.81 GPixel/s versus 44.64 GPixel/s, where the T1000 actually holds a small advantage despite fewer ROPs. FP32 performance is 5.095 TFLOPS for the RX 570 versus 2.500 TFLOPS for the T1000, a more than 2x gap. FP16 performance is also divergent: the T1000 achieves 5.000 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RX 570 matches its FP32 at 5.095 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

Power and physical characteristics are dramatically different. The T1000 has a 50 W TDP, is single-slot, requires no power connectors, and suggests a 250 W PSU. The RX 570 has a 150 W TDP, is dual-slot, requires one 6-pin connector, and suggests a 450 W PSU. Physical dimensions reflect this: the T1000 is 156 mm long (6.1 inches) and 69 mm tall (2.7 inches), while the RX 570 is 241 mm long (9.5 inches). Display outputs also differ: the T1000 offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, while the RX 570 provides 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0b, and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Release dates are separated by years: the T1000 launched on 2021-05-05, while the RX 570 launched on 2017-04-17.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA T1000 8 GB has an average benchmark score of 34,561, which is higher than the AMD Radeon RX 570's average of 28,766.

Q: What is the performance difference in the Geekbench Vulkan test?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 570 scores 42,752, while the NVIDIA T1000 scores 34,561, giving the RX 570 a 19.2% lead in this test.

Q: How do their memory capacities and bandwidths compare?

A: The T1000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 160.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the RX 570 has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has a higher power consumption rating?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 570 has a TDP of 150 W, whereas the NVIDIA T1000 has a TDP of 50 W, making the RX 570 three times more power-hungry.

Q: What are the DirectX versions supported by each card?

A: The NVIDIA T1000 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the AMD Radeon RX 570 supports DirectX 12 (12_0).

Q: Which card has a higher transistor density?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 570 has a transistor density of 24.6 million per square millimeter, slightly higher than the NVIDIA T1000's 23.5 million per square millimeter.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear choice based on priorities. If the primary workload is Vulkan compute, the AMD Radeon RX 570 is the superior option, offering a 19.2% performance lead in the direct benchmark comparison. Its higher shader count, texture rate, and bandwidth make it a brute-force performer for tasks that can utilize its parallel resources. This is a card designed for raw throughput, and the benchmark results confirm that strength.

However, for a broader range of applications, the NVIDIA T1000 8 GB appears to be the more balanced and efficient choice. Its higher average benchmark score and 79th percentile ranking suggest it performs better across diverse workloads, despite losing the Vulkan test. The T1000's advantages in power efficiency (50 W versus 150 W), memory capacity (8 GB versus 4 GB), and smaller physical footprint make it ideal for workstation environments where space, thermal management, and power budgets are constrained. Its support for newer API versions (Vulkan 1.4, DirectX 12_1) also positions it better for future software compatibility.

The choice ultimately depends on the specific workload. For users prioritizing compute performance in Vulkan and willing to accept higher power draw and a larger card, the RX 570 is the data-backed winner. For users needing a versatile, low-power, high-capacity card for professional tasks, the T1000's consistent performance and efficiency make it the recommended pick. The database shows no universal victor; it shows two cards optimized for different priorities.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 570
T1000 8 GB
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,048
896 -56.3%
Shaders
2,048
896 -56.3%
TMUs
128
56 -56.3%
ROPs
32
32 0.0%
Compute Units
32
—
SM Count
—
14
Clocks
Base Clock
1168 MHz
1065 MHz
Boost Clock
1244 MHz
1395 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 7 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
8,192 +100.0%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
224.0 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
39.81 GPixel/s
44.64 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
159.2 GTexel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.095 TFLOPS
2.500 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
318.5 GFLOPS (1:16)
78.12 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
5.095 TFLOPS (1:1)
5.000 TFLOPS (2:1)
Power
TDP
150 W
50 W
TDP (W)
150
50 -66.7%
Suggested PSU
450 W
250 W
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Turing
GPU Name
Polaris 20
TU117
Generation
Polaris (RX 500)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
14 nm
12 nm
Transistors
5,700 million
4,700 million
Die Size
232 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
TSMC
Density
24.6M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.3
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
7.5
Shader Model
6.7
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
241 mm 9.5 inches
156 mm 6.1 inches
Height
—
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.0b3x DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
169 USD
—
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Arctic Islands
Quadro Volta
Successor
Vega
Workstation Ampere
View Radeon RX 570 Details View T1000 8 GB Details