GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 5600M

CORE STATE Navi 10
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1265 MHz
TDP 150 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 1.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A2000

CORE STATE GA106
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1200 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,320
1,345
geekbench_metal
76,653
N/A
geekbench_opencl
59,589
67,695
geekbench_vulkan
48,843
69,089

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

Rendering performance benchmarks between the NVIDIA RTX A2000 and the AMD RX 5600 indicate a clear winner. the NVIDIA RTX A2000 achieves substantially higher FPS throughout modern gaming benchmarks. The memory benefit and engineering improvements convert into visibly better gameplay experiences. Score figures supports this observation. Users demanding premium visuals will take note.

This memory edge of the NVIDIA RTX A2000 gets more relevant at increased resolutions. High resolution rendering requires significant video memory, and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 offers more capacity. The translates into enhanced gameplay in demanding scenarios. Next-gen titles should only require extra memory. This edge expands over releases.

For hardware ray tracing, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 pulls significantly in front of the AMD RX 5600. Its hardware hardware process heavy lighting calculations more capably. Gamers wanting next-gen fidelity should strongly favor the NVIDIA RTX A2000. This RT advantage is considerable. Current titles continually take advantage of real-time ray tracing capabilities.

To summarize, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 represents the superior choice in this evaluation. The performance superiority support examination for those putting together a powerful gaming PC. Although the AMD RX 5600 possesses its merits, the score numbers undeniably favors the NVIDIA RTX A2000. Reach your choice based on this. This gaming gap is considerable enough to matter.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 5600M
RTX A2000
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,304
3,328 +44.4%
Shaders
2,304
3,328 +44.4%
TMUs
144
104 -27.8%
ROPs
64
48 -25.0%
Compute Units
36
SM Count
26
Clocks
Base Clock
1035 MHz
562 MHz
Boost Clock
1265 MHz
1200 MHz
Game Clock
1190 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
6 GB
6 GB
VRAM (MB)
6,144
6,144 0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
192 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
288.0 GB/s
288.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
3 MB
3 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
80.96 GPixel/s
57.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
182.2 GTexel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.829 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
364.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
124.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
11.66 TFLOPS (2:1)
7.987 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
26
Tensor Cores
104
Power
TDP
150 W
70 W
TDP (W)
150
70 -53.3%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 10
GA106
Generation
Navi Mobile (RX 5000M)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
7 nm
8 nm
Transistors
10,300 million
12,000 million
Die Size
251 mm²
276 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
41.0M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
167 mm 6.6 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
449 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Polaris Mobile
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Radeon RX 5600M Details View RTX A2000 Details