AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100

CORE STATE Vega 10
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1500 MHz
TDP 230 W
BUS WIDTH 2048 bit
ARCHITECTURE GCN 5.0
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2017
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5090 D

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2407 MHz
TDP 575 W
BUS WIDTH 512 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_metal
71,319
N/A
geekbench_opencl
66,605
310,674
geekbench_vulkan
54,711
376,915
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
14,326
passmark_directx_10
N/A
231
passmark_directx_11
N/A
371
passmark_directx_12
N/A
219
passmark_directx_9
N/A
434
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,487
passmark_g3d
N/A
44,065
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
28,396

Analysis: AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

# The Verdict

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is in a completely different performance class than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100. Across the two shared benchmark tests, the RTX 5090 D wins both, with margins that are not incremental but generational. The data shows a 366.4% advantage in Geekbench OpenCL and a 588.9% advantage in Geekbench Vulkan. If your workload is compute-heavy and you need current-generation performance, the RTX 5090 D is the only rational choice.

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100, however, still holds a niche. Its 89th percentile ranking among all GPUs is respectable, and it sits in the 92nd percentile for the RTX 5090 D — meaning both are above-average hardware. But the WX 9100 is end-of-life, built on a 14 nm process, and its nearest rivals are AMD Radeon RX 7600M and Radeon Pro Vega 56, with average scores within 0.8% of its own. That is a crowded, low-margin neighborhood. The RTX 5090 D, by contrast, sits near the top of the entire GPU landscape.

For a professional workstation buyer in 2025, the RTX 5090 D is the verdict. For legacy deployments or projects already locked into GCN-era software stacks, the WX 9100 remains functional but obsolete. The performance gap is so wide that no workload in the FACT PACK favors the AMD card.

# Architecture Differences

The RTX 5090 D is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB202 chip fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It packs 92,200 million transistors onto a 750 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 122.9 million per mm². This is a massive, modern GPU with 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, 176 render output units, 170 ray tracing cores, and 680 tensor cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 uses the Vega 10 chip, built on GCN 5.0 architecture, fabricated by GlobalFoundries on a 14 nm process. It contains 12,500 million transistors on a 495 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.3 million per mm². It has 4,096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. Its API support tops out at DirectX 12 (12_1), Vulkan 1.3, and OpenGL 4.6.

The process node difference is stark: 5 nm versus 14 nm. That alone explains a large portion of the performance delta. The RTX 5090 D also carries dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads, while the WX 9100 has none. The memory architectures are worlds apart — GDDR7 versus HBM2 — which impacts bandwidth and capacity in ways detailed below.

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two GPUs share exactly two benchmark results in the FACT PACK: Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan. Both are decisive wins for the RTX 5090 D.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5090 D scores 310,674 against the WX 9100's 66,605. That is a 366.4% delta — the NVIDIA card delivers more than four times the OpenCL compute performance. For any OpenCL-based rendering, simulation, or data processing workload, this is not a close contest.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 5090 D scores 376,915 against 54,711 for the WX 9100. The delta here is 588.9%, meaning the RTX 5090 D is nearly seven times faster in Vulkan compute. This is the single largest margin in the comparison. Vulkan is increasingly common in professional visualization and game engine workloads, and the RTX 5090 D's advantage is overwhelming.

The RTX 5090 D also has its own benchmark suite that the WX 9100 cannot match. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 14,326. In Passmark G3D, it scores 44,065, and in Passmark GPU Compute, 28,396. The WX 9100 has no equivalent results in these tests, so direct comparison is impossible — but the RTX 5090 D's average benchmark score of 77,712 versus the WX 9100's 64,212 tells the story. That is a 21% average advantage, even when comparing across different test sets.

# Specification Differences

The RTX 5090 D and WX 9100 differ in nearly every measurable specification.

Process and Die: 5 nm versus 14 nm. 92,200 million transistors versus 12,500 million. 750 mm² versus 495 mm². The RTX 5090 D has over seven times the transistor count.

Clocks: The RTX 5090 D runs at a 2017 MHz base and 2407 MHz boost. The WX 9100 runs at 1200 MHz base and 1500 MHz boost. The NVIDIA card also has memory clocked at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), versus 945 MHz (1890 Mbps effective) for the AMD card.

Memory: 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The WX 9100 has 16 GB of HBM2 on a 2048-bit bus, delivering 483.8 GB/s. The RTX 5090 D has double the capacity and 3.7 times the bandwidth.

Compute Units: 21,760 shading units versus 4,096 — a 5.3x difference. 680 TMUs versus 256. 176 ROPs versus 64.

Rates: The RTX 5090 D achieves 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,636.8 GTexel/s texture rate. The WX 9100 achieves 96.00 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 104.8 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS — an 8.5x gap. FP16 is 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power: The RTX 5090 D has a 575 W TDP with a 950 W suggested PSU. The WX 9100 has a 230 W TDP with a 550 W suggested PSU. Both are dual-slot. The RTX 5090 D uses a single 16-pin connector; the WX 9100 uses a 6-pin and an 8-pin.

Interface and Outputs: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 3.0 x16. The RTX 5090 D has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The WX 9100 has 6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a.

Dimensions: The RTX 5090 D is 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. The WX 9100 is 267 mm long and 111 mm tall; its width is not listed.

Lifecycle: The RTX 5090 D is active production, released 2025-01-29, with a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD. The WX 9100 is end-of-life, released 2017-07-09, with a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD.

# FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5090 D has 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth from 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus. The WX 9100 has 483.8 GB/s from 16 GB of HBM2 on a 2048-bit bus. The NVIDIA card delivers 3.7 times the bandwidth.

Q: Does the WX 9100 support ray tracing?

A: No. The WX 9100 has no ray tracing cores. The RTX 5090 D has 170 dedicated RT cores.

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5090 D in Vulkan compute?

A: The RTX 5090 D scores 376,915 in Geekbench Vulkan versus 54,711 for the WX 9100, a 588.9% delta — nearly seven times faster.

Q: What is the transistor count difference?

A: The RTX 5090 D has 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The WX 9100 has 12,500 million on a 495 mm² die. That is a 7.4x difference in transistor count.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 throughput?

A: The RTX 5090 D achieves 104.8 TFLOPS FP32. The WX 9100 achieves 12.29 TFLOPS. The RTX 5090 D is 8.5 times faster in FP32.

Q: Are both GPUs still in production?

A: No. The RTX 5090 D is listed as Active production status. The WX 9100 is End-of-life.

# Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5090 D wins in every benchmark category where both cards have data. In OpenCL, it is 366.4% ahead. In Vulkan, 588.9% ahead. Its average benchmark score is 77,712 versus 64,212. There is no workload in the FACT PACK where the WX 9100 comes out ahead.

The RTX 5090 D is the pick for modern compute, AI-adjacent workloads (thanks to 680 tensor cores), ray-traced rendering, and any application that can leverage DirectX 12 Ultimate or Vulkan 1.4. Its 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth make it suitable for large dataset processing. Its 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) throughput are top-tier numbers.

The WX 9100's only practical advantage is its six mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, which could support multi-display professional setups. It also has a lower 230 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU, making it easier to integrate into existing power-constrained systems. Its 16 GB of HBM2 memory is still notable for its era, but the 483.8 GB/s bandwidth is less than a third of the RTX 5090 D's.

For legacy software that requires GCN 5.0 behavior or for systems that cannot physically accommodate a 304 mm, 48 mm thick, 575 W card, the WX 9100 remains a functional option. But the data is unambiguous: the RTX 5090 D is faster in every measurable way, and the performance gap is so large that no software optimization could close it. The WX 9100's 89th percentile ranking is respectable, but the RTX 5090 D's 92nd percentile, combined with 2 wins and 0 losses in head-to-head tests, makes it the definitive choice for anyone who needs maximum performance.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro WX 9100
RTX 5090 D
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,096
21,760 +431.3%
Shaders
4,096
21,760 +431.3%
TMUs
256
680 +165.6%
ROPs
64
176 +175.0%
Compute Units
64
—
SM Count
—
170
Clocks
Base Clock
1200 MHz
2017 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
2407 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz 1890 Mbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
32 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
32,768 +100.0%
Memory Type
HBM2
GDDR7
Memory Bus
2048 bit
512 bit
Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
1.79 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
96 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
423.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
1,636.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
12.29 TFLOPS
104.8 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
768.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
1.637 TFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
24.58 TFLOPS (2:1)
104.8 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
—
170
Tensor Cores
—
680
Power
TDP
230 W
575 W
TDP (W)
230
575 +150.0%
Suggested PSU
550 W
950 W
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Vega 10
GB202
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris (WX x100)
GeForce 50
Process Size
14 nm
5 nm
Transistors
12,500 million
92,200 million
Die Size
495 mm²
750 mm²
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
TSMC
Density
25.3M / mm²
122.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.3
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.7
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
304 mm 12 inches
Height
111 mm 4.4 inches
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
1,599 USD
2,299 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Radeon Pro GCN
GeForce 40
Successor
Radeon Pro Vega
GeForce 60
View Radeon Pro WX 9100 Details View GeForce RTX 5090 D Details