AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Intel Arc A570M Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 and Intel Arc A570M occupy very different corners of the GPU market, yet their benchmark scores place them surprisingly close in overall performance. The data shows a clear victory for the AMD card in the single available head-to-head test, but the Intel part counters with architectural modernity and a drastically lower power envelope. This analysis breaks down the numbers to determine which GPU is the better choice for specific workloads, based strictly on the provided facts.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 has a higher average benchmark score of 64,212, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239 on average, which puts it in the 88th percentile.

Q: How large is the performance gap in the OpenCL benchmark?

A: In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 66,605, while the Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239. This represents a 14.4% lead for the AMD card, making it the definitive winner in this specific test.

Q: What are the closest rivals for each GPU based on average score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA CMP 30HX, which scores 63,842 and is only 0.6% behind. The Intel Arc A570M’s closest competitor is the AMD Radeon PRO V710, which scores 58,657 and is 0.7% ahead of the Intel part.

Q: Which GPU has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 has a significantly higher memory bandwidth of 483.8 GB/s, thanks to its HBM2 memory and 2048-bit bus. The Intel Arc A570M, using GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, offers 224.0 GB/s, which is less than half the AMD figure.

Q: What is the difference in their production status?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 is marked as "End-of-life," having been released in 2017. In contrast, the Intel Arc A570M is listed as "Active" production status, with a release date in 2023.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A570M support any features the AMD card lacks?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A570M includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 has no ray tracing cores listed and only supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures, nodes, and philosophies. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 utilizes the Vega 10 chip based on the GCN 5.0 architecture, manufactured on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. This is a large, complex die measuring 495 mm² and containing 12,500 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 25.3 million per mm². The Intel Arc A570M, conversely, uses the DG2-256 chip based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a much more modern 6 nm process at TSMC. Its die is substantially smaller at 269 mm², housing 11,500 million transistors, which yields a higher density of 42.8 million per mm².

The most striking architectural difference lies in the compute resources and feature sets. The AMD card is a compute powerhouse, offering 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 render output units (ROPs). The Intel part is cut down significantly, with 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. However, the Intel chip includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the AMD Vega 10 design. This means the Arc A570M is equipped for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the WX 9100 is not.

Memory architecture also diverges sharply. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 is equipped with 16 GB of HBM2 memory on a 2048-bit bus, delivering a massive 483.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc A570M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s. This difference is fundamental; the AMD card is designed for massive data throughput, while the Intel part relies on lower latency and higher clocked memory. The process node difference is also a key factor in the power draw, with the Intel part being far more efficient.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison available is the Geekbench OpenCL test, which measures raw compute performance. In this test, the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 66,605, while the Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239. This results in a 14.4% victory for the AMD card. This is a significant margin and indicates that in pure compute tasks, the older GCN architecture still holds a considerable advantage.

However, the benchmark results also show that the Intel Arc A570M is not far behind in overall standing. While the AMD card wins the head-to-head, its average benchmark score of 64,212 is only 10.3% higher than the Intel part’s 58,239. The Intel card’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon PRO V710, scores 58,657, which is only 0.7% higher. This suggests that the Arc A570M is competitive with a range of other GPUs, even if it loses to the WX 9100 in this specific test.

The wins are one-sided in this data set, with the AMD card taking the sole victory. There are no tests where the Intel Arc A570M comes out ahead. The deltaPct of 14.4% is the only direct comparison point, and it clearly favors the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100. The data does not provide any Vulkan or Metal scores for the Intel part, so it is impossible to assess performance in those APIs from this pack.

Specification Differences

• Process Node: The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 uses a 14 nm process, while the Intel Arc A570M uses a 6 nm process.
• Die Size: The AMD chip is 495 mm², whereas the Intel chip is 269 mm².
• Transistor Density: The AMD card has 25.3M transistors per mm², while the Intel card has 42.8M per mm².
• Base Clock: The AMD card has a base clock of 1200 MHz, compared to the Intel card’s 900 MHz.
• Boost Clock: The AMD card boosts to 1500 MHz, while the Intel card boosts to 1300 MHz.
• Memory Size: The AMD card has 16 GB of HBM2, while the Intel card has 8 GB of GDDR6.
• Memory Bus Width: The AMD card uses a 2048-bit bus, while the Intel card uses a 128-bit bus.
• Memory Bandwidth: The AMD card offers 483.8 GB/s, while the Intel card offers 224.0 GB/s.
• Shading Units: The AMD card has 4,096 shading units, while the Intel card has 2,048.
• TMUs: The AMD card has 256 TMUs, while the Intel card has 128.
• Ray Tracing Cores: The AMD card has none, while the Intel card has 16.
• Pixel Rate: The AMD card has a pixel rate of 96.00 GPixel/s, while the Intel card has 83.20 GPixel/s.
• Texture Rate: The AMD card has a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s, while the Intel card has 166.4 GTexel/s.
• FP32 Performance: The AMD card delivers 12.29 TFLOPS, while the Intel card delivers 5.325 TFLOPS.
• TDP: The AMD card has a 230 W TDP, while the Intel card has a 75 W TDP.
• Power Connectors: The AMD card requires 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin, while the Intel card has no power connectors listed.
• Suggested PSU: The AMD card suggests a 550 W PSU, while the Intel card has no suggested PSU listed.
• Bus Interface: The AMD card uses PCIe 3.0 x16, while the Intel card uses PCIe 4.0 x8.
• DirectX Support: The AMD card supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the Intel card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).
• Vulkan Support: The AMD card supports Vulkan 1.3, while the Intel card supports Vulkan 1.4.
• Production Status: The AMD card is End-of-life, while the Intel card is Active.
• Release Date: The AMD card was released in 2017, while the Intel card was released in 2023.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 wins in raw compute throughput. Its benchmark score is 14.4% higher than the Intel Arc A570M in OpenCL, and its FP32 performance of 12.29 TFLOPS is more than double the Intel card’s 5.325 TFLOPS. The AMD card also has a significant advantage in memory bandwidth, with 483.8 GB/s versus 224.0 GB/s, making it better suited for data-heavy workloads like large model rendering or scientific simulation. Its 16 GB of memory is also double the Intel’s 8 GB, allowing for larger datasets to be held in VRAM.

The Intel Arc A570M wins in efficiency and modern feature support. Its 75 W TDP is less than a third of the AMD card’s 230 W, making it far more suitable for mobile or low-power systems. It includes 16 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which the AMD card cannot do. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, newer API versions that may be required for the latest games and applications. Its smaller 269 mm² die and 6 nm process also indicate a more modern, power-efficient design.

The use cases are clear. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 is for a user who needs maximum compute performance and massive memory bandwidth, regardless of power consumption. The Intel Arc A570M is for a user who needs a capable GPU that fits into a power-constrained environment and supports modern graphics features like ray tracing.

The Verdict

The data supports a split verdict based on user priorities. For pure performance, the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 is the clear winner. It is 14.4% faster in the OpenCL benchmark, has double the memory capacity and bandwidth, and offers more than double the FP32 compute power. If the task is compute-heavy and power is not a concern, the AMD card is the stronger choice.

For modern features and efficiency, the Intel Arc A570M is the better pick. It is the only one of the two with ray tracing cores, and it supports newer DirectX and Vulkan APIs. Its 75 W power draw makes it a viable option for laptops or small form factor systems where the 230 W AMD card would be impractical. The Intel card is also an active product, whereas the AMD card is end-of-life.

The benchmark scores show that while the AMD card wins the head-to-head, the Intel card is not far behind in overall percentile ranking (88th vs 89th). The Intel Arc A570M is a modern, efficient GPU with a feature set the older AMD card lacks. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 is a brute-force compute solution that still holds a performance lead. The choice ultimately comes down to whether the user values raw power or modern efficiency and features.