GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7900

CORE STATE Navi 31

VRAM 48 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2495 MHz

TDP 295 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

CMP 90HX

CORE STATE GA102

VRAM 10 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1710 MHz

TDP 320 W

BUS WIDTH 320 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

84,379

69,000

geekbench_vulkan

137,070

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX

The graphics card analysis between Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and NVIDIA CMP 90HX shows surprisingly close performance. Both options swap victories throughout different games, with no holding a clear edge. This test data demonstrates this assessment. Not one graphics card dominates consistently. Users have a real choice with these options.

Gaming performance similarly reveal close results between Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and NVIDIA CMP 90HX. Smoothness gaps generally fall inside 5-10%. This slight deltas are rarely visible during everyday play sessions. Each GPUs provide smooth frame rates. Gaming enthusiasts could select safely between them.

Ultimately, consumers should pick based on availability over raw FPS solely. Both Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and NVIDIA CMP 90HX deliver strong visual performance for the respective categories. The determination hinges on individual preferences. Both selection is reasonable. You shouldn't go badly here.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

PRO W7900

CMP 90HX

Core Specs

Shading Units

6,144

6,400 +4.2%

Shaders

6,144

6,400 +4.2%

TMUs

384

200 -47.9%

ROPs

192

80 -58.3%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1855 MHz

1500 MHz

Boost Clock

2495 MHz

1710 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

1188 MHz 19 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

48 GB

10 GB

VRAM (MB)

49,152

10,240 -79.2%

Memory Type

GDDR6

GDDR6X

Memory Bus

384 bit

320 bit

Bandwidth

864.0 GB/s

760.3 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

256 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

6 MB

5 MB

L3 Cache

96 MB

—

L0 Cache

64 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

479.0 GPixel/s

136.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

958.1 GTexel/s

342.0 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

61.32 TFLOPS

21.89 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1.916 TFLOPS (1:32)

342.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

122.6 TFLOPS (2:1)

21.89 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

50 -47.9%

Tensor Cores

—

200

Matrix Cores

192

—

Power

TDP

295 W

320 W

TDP (W)

295

320 +8.5%

Suggested PSU

600 W

700 W

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Ampere

GPU Name

Navi 31

GA102

Codename

Plum Bonito

—

Generation

Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)

Mining GPUs

Process Size

5 nm

8 nm

Transistors

57,700 million

28,300 million

Die Size

529 mm²

628 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

109.1M / mm²

45.1M / mm²

AMD MCM

GCD Transistors

45,400 million

—

GCD Die Size

304.35 mm²

—

MCD Transistors

2,050 million x6

—

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Triple-slot

Dual-slot

Length

280 mm 11 inches

285 mm 11.2 inches

Height

110 mm 4.3 inches

112 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

3x DisplayPort 2.11x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

No outputs

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 1.0 x4

Other

Launch Price

3,999 USD

—

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Radeon Pro Vega

—

View Radeon PRO W7900 Details View CMP 90HX Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO W7900

CMP 90HX

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons