AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct comparison between the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 and the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile is unusual because the two parts occupy entirely different performance strata. The database records no head-to-head benchmark entries, and the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores or average score in the database. The AMD Radeon PRO W7800, by contrast, has two recorded benchmark results: 154,366 in Geekbench OpenCL and 175,422 in Geekbench Vulkan, producing an average benchmark score of 164,894.

This average score places the Radeon PRO W7800 at the 97th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its closest rivals, as recorded in the database, are the NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation with an average score of 166,094 and a delta of -0.7%, the NVIDIA RTX A5500 at 165,217 with a delta of -0.2%, the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X at 168,574 with a delta of -2.2%, and the NVIDIA A100 PCIe 40 GB at 162,504 with a delta of 1.5%. These deltas indicate that the Radeon PRO W7800 sits within a narrow band of performance, within 2.2% of each of these four rivals. The data shows a tightly clustered competitive set, with the Radeon PRO W7800 effectively trading places with the RTX A5500 and RTX 4500 Ada Generation, while trailing the Radeon Pro W6900X by 2.2% and leading the A100 PCIe 40 GB by 1.5%.

The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile, however, has no benchmark scores recorded, and its percentile rank of 50 places it at the median of the database population. Without recorded scores or rival entries, the database cannot quantify its performance relative to the Radeon PRO W7800. The absence of head-to-head results means any direct numerical comparison is impossible. The Intel part's average benchmark score is listed as 0, which likely reflects the lack of any recorded test data rather than an actual performance result. The data indicates that the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile is a newly released integrated graphics solution, with a release date of January 26, 2026, and has not yet accumulated benchmark entries in the database.

The Radeon PRO W7800's recorded scores show a notable gap between its OpenCL and Vulkan results. The Vulkan score of 175,422 exceeds the OpenCL score of 154,366 by approximately 13.6%. This difference suggests that the RDNA 3.0 architecture responds differently to these two APIs, with Vulkan workloads extracting more performance from the hardware. The Intel part, lacking any recorded results, cannot be compared on this metric.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs differ fundamentally in process technology, chip design, and feature scope. The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 uses the Navi 31 chip built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile uses the Panther Lake chip built on a 3 nm process at Intel. The AMD chip contains 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 109.1 million per square millimeter. The Intel chip's transistor count, die size, and transistor density are all listed as unknown in the database.

The Radeon PRO W7800 is a discrete, dual-slot card with a length of 280 mm (11 inches), height of 110 mm (4.3 inches), and width of 40 mm (1.6 inches). It requires 2x 8-pin power connectors and a 600 W suggested power supply. Its thermal design power is 260 W. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. Its TDP is 25 W. It has no physical dimensions recorded, as it is integrated into a mobile processor package.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory, with memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent". This means the Intel part's memory performance depends entirely on the host system's memory configuration, whereas the AMD card has dedicated, fixed memory resources.

The compute resources scale accordingly. The Radeon PRO W7800 has 4,480 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 128 render output units, and 70 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 4 ray tracing cores. The AMD part's pixel rate is 323.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 707.0 GTexel/s, while the Intel part delivers 36.80 GPixel/s and 73.60 GTexel/s. Floating-point throughput differs by an order of magnitude: the Radeon PRO W7800 delivers 45.25 TFLOPS FP32 and 90.50 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), while the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile delivers 2.355 TFLOPS FP32 and 4.710 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Clock speeds also differ significantly. The Radeon PRO W7800 has a base clock of 1895 MHz and a boost clock of 2525 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. The lower base clock for the Intel integrated solution reflects its power-constrained mobile context, while the boost clock approaches the AMD part's boost but from a much lower baseline.

Both GPUs support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither has tensor cores listed. The Radeon PRO W7800 is from the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Plum Bonito, belonging to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile uses the Xe3-LPG architecture in the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. The AMD part's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, while the Intel part has no predecessor listed.

FAQ

Q: What are the recorded benchmark scores for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 154,366 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 175,422, with an average benchmark score of 164,894. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of 0 in the database.

Q: How does the Radeon PRO W7800 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Radeon PRO W7800 sits within 2.2% of four rivals: it trails the Radeon Pro W6900X by 2.2% (168,574 vs. 164,894), trails the NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation by 0.7% (166,094 vs. 164,894), trails the NVIDIA RTX A5500 by 0.2% (165,217 vs. 164,894), and leads the NVIDIA A100 PCIe 40 GB by 1.5% (162,504 vs. 164,894).

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 has a TDP of 260 W, uses 2x 8-pin power connectors, and requires a 600 W suggested power supply. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W, uses no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU listed.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 uses 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all dependent on the host system.

Q: What are the process nodes and foundries for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC using the Navi 31 chip with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile is built on a 3 nm process at Intel using the Panther Lake chip, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

Q: What is the release date and production status for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 was released on April 12, 2023, and is listed as Active in production. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile was released on January 26, 2026, and is also listed as Active in production.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear performance hierarchy but also a fundamental use-case divergence. The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 is a professional workstation GPU with a 97th percentile rank, an average benchmark score of 164,894, and a launch MSRP of 2,499 USD. It competes directly with professional NVIDIA and AMD workstation cards, as evidenced by its nearest rival deltas all within 2.2%. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile is an integrated mobile GPU with no recorded benchmarks, a 50th percentile rank, and an average score of 0. It cannot be quantitatively compared to the Radeon PRO W7800 based on the recorded data.

For workloads requiring maximum compute throughput, large dedicated memory, and high-bandwidth rendering, the Radeon PRO W7800 is the only option with recorded data supporting such claims. Its 45.25 TFLOPS FP32 and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are orders of magnitude above the Intel part's 2.355 TFLOPS and system-dependent memory. The Radeon PRO W7800's 70 ray tracing cores versus the Intel part's 4 further separate them in ray-traced workloads.

The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile, however, operates at 25 W TDP with no power connectors, making it suitable for portable devices where power draw and physical space are constrained. Its 3 nm process and Xe3-LPG architecture represent a newer design generation, but the database lacks any performance measurements to validate its capabilities. The Radeon PRO W7800's 260 W TDP and dual-slot form factor require a desktop workstation chassis with adequate cooling and power delivery.

The choice between these two GPUs depends entirely on the target platform. The Radeon PRO W7800 serves desktop professional workstations with high compute demands. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile serves mobile integrated graphics with minimal power draw. The database records no crossover benchmarks, so any direct performance comparison must wait until the Intel part accrues test data.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two GPUs:

• Chip: Navi 31 vs. Panther Lake
• Architecture: RDNA 3.0 vs. Xe3-LPG
• Process Node: 5 nm vs. 3 nm
• Foundry: TSMC vs. Intel
• Transistors: 57,700 million vs. unknown
• Die Size: 529 mm² vs. unknown
• Base Clock: 1895 MHz vs. 300 MHz
• Boost Clock: 2525 MHz vs. 2300 MHz
• Memory Size: 32 GB vs. System Shared
• Memory Type: GDDR6 vs. System Shared
• Memory Bus Width: 256 bit vs. System Shared
• Memory Bandwidth: 576.0 GB/s vs. System Dependent
• Memory Clock: 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) vs. not applicable
• Shading Units: 4480 vs. 512
• TMUs: 280 vs. 32
• ROPs: 128 vs. 16
• RT Cores: 70 vs. 4
• Pixel Rate: 323.2 GPixel/s vs. 36.80 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 707.0 GTexel/s vs. 73.60 GTexel/s
• FP32: 45.25 TFLOPS vs. 2.355 TFLOPS
• FP16: 90.50 TFLOPS (2:1) vs. 4.710 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 260 W vs. 25 W
• Slot Width: Dual-slot vs. IGP
• Power Connectors: 2x 8-pin vs. None
• Suggested PSU: 600 W vs. null
• Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x16 vs. IGP
• Display Outputs: 3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 vs. Portable Device Dependent
• Dimensions: 280 mm x 110 mm x 40 mm vs. null
• Release Date: April 12, 2023 vs. January 26, 2026
• Launch MSRP: 2,499 USD vs. null

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 wins in every measured performance category in the database. Its compute throughput, memory bandwidth, and rendering rates are all substantially higher than the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile. The Radeon PRO W7800's 45.25 TFLOPS FP32 is roughly 19 times the Intel part's 2.355 TFLOPS, and its 576.0 GB/s dedicated bandwidth far exceeds the system-dependent memory of the Intel solution. The 32 GB GDDR6 memory capacity allows large datasets to reside locally on the GPU, while the Intel part must share system memory.

The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile wins in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 25 W TDP is one-tenth of the Radeon PRO W7800's 260 W, and it requires no power connectors or additional cooling beyond the host system. As an IGP, it occupies no expansion slot and has no dimensions. Its 3 nm process node represents a newer fabrication technology, potentially offering higher efficiency per transistor, though the database does not record efficiency metrics.

For desktop workstation render farms, the Radeon PRO W7800 provides the compute resources necessary for heavy 3D rendering, simulation, and AI workloads. Its 70 ray tracing cores and 128 ROPs support demanding graphics pipelines. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile, with 4 ray tracing cores and 16 ROPs, addresses basic graphics acceleration for thin-and-light laptops or compact mobile devices where battery life and thermal limits dominate.

The Radeon PRO W7800's dual DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, including one mini-DisplayPort 2.1, support multi-monitor professional setups. The Intel part's display outputs depend on the portable device's configuration. The Radeon PRO W7800's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides high-bandwidth host communication, while the Intel IGP uses the system's integrated bus.

The database contains no benchmark results for the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile, so its actual performance remains unquantified. The Radeon PRO W7800's recorded scores and 97th percentile rank establish a concrete performance level. The Intel part's 50th percentile rank, without any scores, likely reflects its position as an entry-level integrated solution rather than a measured performance result. Until the database accumulates test data for the Intel part, the Radeon PRO W7800 stands as the only GPU of the two with verified performance records.