AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct comparison between the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is starkly one-sided in the recorded data. Across the two shared benchmark tests, the NVIDIA card claims victory in both instances, leaving the AMD workstation card without a single head-to-head win.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5090 D posts a score of 310,674 against the Radeon PRO W7700's 108,245. This represents a delta of 65.2 percent in favor of NVIDIA, meaning the RTX 5090 D more than doubles the AMD card's raw compute throughput in this API. The gap is slightly wider in Geekbench Vulkan, where the RTX 5090 D scores 376,915 versus 129,706 for the Radeon PRO W7700, a 65.6 percent margin. Both deltas are remarkably consistent, suggesting the performance advantage scales uniformly across these two GPU compute workloads rather than being API-specific.

The absolute numbers are telling. The RTX 5090 D's Vulkan score is nearly three times the AMD card's figure, and even its lower OpenCL result remains roughly 2.9 times higher. For context, the Radeon PRO W7700's average benchmark score across all recorded tests sits at 118,976, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The RTX 5090 D, despite winning both head-to-head tests, carries a lower average benchmark score of 77,712 and sits in the 92nd percentile. This inversion between head-to-head dominance and overall percentile ranking stems from the different test suites recorded for each card: the AMD card has only two benchmark entries, while the NVIDIA card has ten, including several older DirectX and Passmark tests that pull its average down.

The nearest rival data further contextualizes the AMD card's position. The Radeon PRO W7700 sits just 1.3 percent above the NVIDIA GB10, 1.6 percent above the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, 4 percent above the Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, and 4.4 percent above the RTX A5500 Mobile. These are all close margins, indicating the W7700 competes in a tightly packed tier of workstation and datacenter GPUs. The RTX 5090 D, by contrast, finds its nearest rivals among mobile gaming GPUs: it sits 1.1 percent above the RX 6650M XT, 1.6 percent below the RX 6850M XT, 2.1 percent below the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB, and 2.4 percent below the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB. This clustering suggests the RTX 5090 D's recorded benchmark profile is more heterogeneous, mixing compute tests with legacy DirectX workloads that different GPUs handle with varying efficiency.

Architecture Differences

The two cards represent fundamentally different design philosophies despite both being built on TSMC's 5 nm process node. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 uses the Navi 32 chip under the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Wheat Nas, and belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D uses the GB202 chip under the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and belongs to the GeForce 50-series generation.

The transistor counts reveal a massive scale difference. The RTX 5090 D packs 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, while the Radeon PRO W7700 contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. This translates to a transistor density of 122.9 million per square millimeter for NVIDIA versus 81.2 million for AMD, indicating the Blackwell chip is both larger and denser. The RTX 5090 D's die is more than double the area of the Navi 32, which explains much of its performance advantage in raw compute.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The AMD card uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth at an effective 18 Gbps. The RTX 5090 D doubles capacity to 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, achieving 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth at 28 Gbps effective. The NVIDIA card's bandwidth is over three times higher, a critical factor for memory-intensive workloads.

The compute unit counts follow the die size disparity. The Radeon PRO W7700 has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 48 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5090 D has 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores. The NVIDIA card also carries tensor cores, which the AMD card lacks entirely, enabling AI acceleration workloads that the W7700 cannot directly match. Floating-point throughput tells the same story: the RTX 5090 D delivers 104.8 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), while the Radeon PRO W7700 manages 31.95 TFLOPS FP32 and 63.90 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The NVIDIA card's FP32 output is over three times higher, and its FP16 output is 64 percent higher despite the AMD card's 2:1 ratio advantage.

Clock speeds show a narrower gap. The Radeon PRO W7700 runs at 1900 MHz base and 2600 MHz boost, while the RTX 5090 D runs at 2017 MHz base and 2407 MHz boost. The AMD card actually boosts higher, but the NVIDIA card's enormous shader count overwhelms that clock advantage. Pixel and texture rates follow the core counts: 423.6 GPixel/s and 1,636.8 GTexel/s for NVIDIA versus 249.6 GPixel/s and 499.2 GTexel/s for AMD.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the RTX 5090 D wins every shared workload, but the Radeon PRO W7700 has clear strengths in specific contexts. The AMD card's higher boost clock of 2600 MHz versus 2407 MHz suggests it can sustain higher per-core frequency in lightly threaded or latency-sensitive tasks, though no direct benchmark in the database captures this advantage. Its lower transistor density and smaller die also imply less thermal density, which could benefit sustained workloads in constrained chassis.

The Radeon PRO W7700's 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs, despite losing both head-to-head tests, indicates it excels in its recorded benchmark suite. Its average score of 118,976 is substantially higher than the RTX 5090 D's 77,712, driven by the fact that all of the AMD card's recorded tests are modern compute workloads (OpenCL and Vulkan), while the NVIDIA card's suite includes legacy DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 tests where it scores relatively low (231, 371, 219, and 434 respectively on Passmark). This suggests the W7700 is optimized for current-generation GPU compute, while the RTX 5090 D's broader benchmark profile includes older APIs where it does not shine.

For use cases, the RTX 5090 D dominates in compute-heavy tasks like machine learning inference, large dataset processing, and high-resolution rendering where its 32 GB memory, 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, and tensor cores provide decisive advantages. The Radeon PRO W7700, with its 16 GB GDDR6 and 576 GB/s bandwidth, remains competitive for workstation tasks that fit within its memory capacity, particularly in OpenCL and Vulkan compute where its 95th percentile ranking reflects strong relative performance.

The power envelope also differentiates practical use. The RTX 5090 D draws 575 W with a 950 W suggested PSU, while the Radeon PRO W7700 draws 190 W with a 450 W suggested PSU. The AMD card's dramatically lower power draw makes it more suitable for multi-GPU workstations, dense server configurations, or environments with thermal or power constraints. The RTX 5090 D's 1x 16-pin connector versus the W7700's 1x 8-pin further highlights this difference.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has an average benchmark score of 118,976 across its two recorded tests, compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D's 77,712 across ten tests. This difference reflects the different test suites rather than an overall performance reversal.

Q: What is the performance gap in the shared OpenCL test?

A: In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5090 D scores 310,674 against the W7700's 108,245, a 65.2 percent margin in NVIDIA's favor.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The RTX 5090 D has 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, while the W7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the AMD card have tensor cores?

A: No, the Radeon PRO W7700 has no tensor cores, while the RTX 5090 D includes 680 tensor cores for AI acceleration.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The Radeon PRO W7700 boosts to 2600 MHz, while the RTX 5090 D boosts to 2407 MHz. The AMD card's higher boost clock does not compensate for the NVIDIA card's far higher core count.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The RTX 5090 D has a 575 W TDP with a 950 W suggested PSU, while the W7700 has a 190 W TDP with a 450 W suggested PSU.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload requirements. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is the definitive choice for tasks that demand maximum raw compute throughput, large memory capacity, or AI acceleration. Its 65.2 percent and 65.6 percent margins in OpenCL and Vulkan respectively are decisive, and its 32 GB GDDR7 memory with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth enables working sets that would exhaust the W7700's 16 GB. The 680 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for neural network workloads that the AMD card cannot match at all.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 is the appropriate selection for environments where power efficiency, physical size, and modern API performance within a modest memory footprint matter more than absolute throughput. Its 190 W TDP versus 575 W, 241 mm length versus 304 mm, and 1x 8-pin versus 1x 16-pin power connector make it far easier to integrate into existing workstations or multi-GPU arrays. Its 95th percentile ranking and high average score in modern compute benchmarks indicate it remains a strong performer for OpenCL and Vulkan workloads that fit within its specifications.

For professional users who prioritize AI, massive datasets, or high-resolution rendering, the RTX 5090 D's advantages are insurmountable in the recorded data. For users who prioritize deployability, power budgets, or cost of system integration, the W7700 offers competitive modern compute performance with a fraction of the power draw. The RTX 5090 D's launch MSRP is 2,299 USD, while the W7700's launch MSRP is 999 USD, a difference that reflects their different market positions. The choice ultimately hinges on whether the workload demands the RTX 5090 D's scale or fits within the W7700's efficient envelope.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO W7700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 32 | GB202 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | 92,200 million |

| Die Size | 346 mm² | 750 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 81.2M / mm² | 122.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1900 MHz | 2017 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz | 2407 MHz |

| Memory Speed | 18 Gbps effective | 28 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 32 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus | 256 bit | 512 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 1.79 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 3,072 | 21,760 |

| TMUs | 192 | 680 |

| ROPs | 96 | 176 |

| RT Cores | 48 | 170 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 680 |

| Pixel Rate | 249.6 GPixel/s | 423.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 499.2 GTexel/s | 1,636.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 31.95 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 63.90 TFLOPS (2:1) | 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 190 W | 575 W |

| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 950 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Length | 241 mm | 304 mm |

| Height | 111 mm | 137 mm |

| Width | Not recorded | 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-11-12 | 2025-01-29 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | GeForce 40 |

| Successor | None recorded | GeForce 60 |

| Production Status | Not recorded | Active |

| Launch MSRP | 999 USD | 2,299 USD |