AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile Comparison

The data presents a clear performance hierarchy between the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile and the AMD Radeon PRO W7600, but the choice is not merely about raw speed. The NVIDIA part delivers a decisive lead in both available benchmarks, while the AMD card counters with a more modern architecture, a smaller physical footprint, and a lower power draw. These are two professional mobile GPUs aimed at different segments, with the benchmark results reinforcing their distinct design philosophies.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile is the definitive performance winner. It secures victories in both head-to-head tests, with a commanding 52.4% lead in Geekbench OpenCL and a solid 11.8% advantage in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score of 113,944 places it in the 94th percentile of all GPUs, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 sits at the 93rd percentile with an average of 87,108. The NVIDIA card's nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, is virtually tied at -0.4% delta, suggesting the A5500 Mobile is a high-end performer. In contrast, the W7600's closest competitor is the NVIDIA Quadro GP100, also at -0.4%, but its overall score is 30.8% lower than the A5500 Mobile's average. For users prioritizing maximum compute throughput in OpenCL and Vulkan workloads, the RTX A5500 Mobile is the logical pick.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is the choice for those who need a current-generation product with a lower power envelope. It draws 130 W compared to the NVIDIA's 165 W, and it is a single-slot card with a 241 mm length, making it easier to integrate into compact systems. While its performance is lower, the W7600 is an active product, whereas the RTX A5500 Mobile is end-of-life. The data suggests the W7600 is a more efficient and modern solution, but it cannot match the raw compute power of the older, larger NVIDIA chip.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile wins decisively in compute-heavy tasks. Its 52.4% advantage in Geekbench OpenCL suggests a massive lead in general-purpose GPU compute, which is critical for rendering, simulation, and data processing. The 11.8% win in Vulkan also points to better performance in graphics APIs that are increasingly used for professional visualization. With 7,424 shading units, 232 TMUs, and 22.27 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, the A5500 Mobile is engineered for brute-force parallel workloads. Its 16 GB of memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth also provides a substantial data throughput advantage over the AMD card.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins in the categories of efficiency and physical design. Its 6 nm process node from TSMC, compared to the NVIDIA's 8 nm Samsung node, allows for a much smaller die (204 mm² vs 496 mm²) and a higher transistor density (65.2M / mm² vs 44.4M / mm²). This translates to a 130 W TDP, which is 21.2% lower than the NVIDIA part. The W7600 also features a higher boost clock (2440 MHz vs 1500 MHz) and a higher pixel rate (156.2 GPixel/s vs 144.0 GPixel/s), indicating it can handle fill-rate-limited tasks competently. It also supports modern DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, whereas the NVIDIA's display outputs are dependent on the portable device.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is stark. The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile is built on the Ampere architecture, using the GA103 chip fabricated on an 8 nm process by Samsung. This is a large, power-hungry design with 22,000 million transistors. It includes dedicated hardware for ray tracing (58 RT cores) and AI acceleration (232 Tensor Cores), a feature that the AMD card lacks entirely. The NVIDIA card also supports FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning it processes both at 22.27 TFLOPS.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the Navi 33 chip on a more advanced 6 nm TSMC process. This is a smaller, more efficient design with 13,300 million transistors. It also has 32 ray tracing cores but no tensor core equivalent. A key difference is its FP16 performance, which is 39.98 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, effectively doubling the FP32 rate. This suggests the AMD card is optimized for workloads that can leverage half-precision math. The AMD card also uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the NVIDIA uses a full x16 connection, which could impact data transfer in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile has a significantly higher average benchmark score of 113,944, compared to the AMD Radeon PRO W7600's 87,108. This represents a 30.8% difference in favor of the NVIDIA card.

Q: What is the performance gap in the Vulkan benchmark?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile scores 103,601 in Geekbench Vulkan, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 scores 92,688. The NVIDIA card leads by 11.8%.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 have any advantage in clock speed?

A: Yes, the AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2440 MHz, which are considerably higher than the NVIDIA's 975 MHz base and 1500 MHz boost clocks.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile has a 256-bit memory bus providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s.

Q: Are there any architectural features exclusive to the NVIDIA card?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile includes 232 Tensor Cores, which are not present in the AMD Radeon PRO W7600. These are designed for AI and machine learning workloads.

Q: What is the difference in power consumption?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a TDP of 130 W, while the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile has a higher TDP of 165 W.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is in the Geekbench OpenCL test. The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile scores 124,287, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 manages 81,528. This is a 52.4% delta, a massive margin that highlights the NVIDIA card's raw compute capability. This result is likely driven by the NVIDIA's superior FP32 throughput (22.27 TFLOPS vs 19.99 TFLOPS), its much higher texture fill rate (348.0 GTexel/s vs 312.3 GTexel/s), and its larger memory subsystem. The NVIDIA card's nearest rival in this performance class is the Tesla V100, which is only 0.4% behind, showing that the A5500 Mobile is competing with data center-grade hardware.

The Geekbench Vulkan test shows a closer contest. The NVIDIA card wins with 103,601 against the AMD's 92,688, a delta of 11.8%. While still a clear victory for NVIDIA, the smaller gap suggests that the AMD card's architecture is more competitive in graphics-centric APIs. The AMD card's higher boost clock (2440 MHz) and pixel rate (156.2 GPixel/s) help it narrow the deficit, but the NVIDIA card’s superior bandwidth and shading unit count still give it the edge. The AMD's closest rival in its overall score bracket is the Quadro GP100 at -0.4%, while the NVIDIA's nearest rival is the RTX 4000 SFF Ada at -2.7%. These rival deltas indicate the performance tiers are quite distinct.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every core specification. The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile has 7,424 shading units, 232 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The NVIDIA card also has 58 RT cores and 232 Tensor Cores, versus the AMD's 32 RT cores and no Tensor Cores. Clock speeds are inverted: the NVIDIA runs at 975 MHz base and 1500 MHz boost, while the AMD runs at 1720 MHz base and 2440 MHz boost. Memory configurations are also very different: the NVIDIA offers 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD offers 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The process nodes are 8 nm (Samsung) for NVIDIA and 6 nm (TSMC) for AMD, leading to different die sizes (496 mm² vs 204 mm²) and transistor counts (22,000 million vs 13,300 million). The TDP is 165 W for NVIDIA and 130 W for AMD. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for NVIDIA and x8 for AMD. The AMD card is a single-slot design with specific dimensions (241 mm length), while the NVIDIA's dimensions are not specified.