AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile Comparison

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile represent two very different approaches to professional graphics, and the benchmark data shows a clear, though not universal, performance hierarchy. The W7600, a desktop workstation card built on RDNA 3.0, decisively outperforms the older, mobile-focused Ampere part in the available tests, but the A3000 Mobile’s lower power profile and distinct feature set mean it still occupies a specific niche. The data indicates a substantial performance gap, with the biggest difference appearing in Vulkan workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are unambiguous: the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins both recorded benchmark tests. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the W7600 scores 81528, while the RTX A3000 Mobile scores 79091. This translates to a 3.1% advantage for the AMD card. While this is a win, it is a relatively modest one, suggesting that in raw compute tasks that scale well across architectures, the two cards are more evenly matched than their generational differences might imply. The RTX A3000 Mobile’s higher shader count (4096 vs. 2048) likely helps it stay competitive in this specific workload despite its older architecture and much lower clock speeds.

The situation changes dramatically in the Geekbench Vulkan test. Here, the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 scores 92688, a massive 51.5% higher than the RTX A3000 Mobile’s score of 61189. This is a dominant victory for the RDNA 3.0 architecture, indicating a significant advantage in driver overhead, geometry processing, or other aspects that are heavily utilized in Vulkan. This is not a marginal difference; it is a generational leap in performance for this API. The W7600’s boost clock of 2440 MHz, compared to the A3000 Mobile’s 1230 MHz, is a key factor in this result.

Looking at the broader average benchmark scores, the W7600’s average of 87108 places it in the 93rd percentile of all GPUs, while the A3000 Mobile’s average of 70140 puts it in the 91st percentile. The W7600’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile (avg score 91134, -4.4% delta) and the NVIDIA RTX A4500 (avg score 91671, -5% delta), showing it is competitive with higher-tier workstation parts. The A3000 Mobile, on the other hand, sits near the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (avg score 69986, 0.2% delta) and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (avg score 69870, 0.4% delta), which are much older cards. This context shows that the W7600 is performing at a level far above the A3000 Mobile, which is now competing with legacy hardware from a previous era.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a significantly higher average benchmark score of 87108, compared to the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile’s 70140. This represents a substantial overall performance advantage for the AMD card.

Q: How large is the performance gap in the Vulkan benchmark?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 leads the RTX A3000 Mobile by a decisive 51.5% in the Geekbench Vulkan test, scoring 92688 versus 61189. This is the largest performance delta between the two cards in any test.

Q: Is the RTX A3000 Mobile competitive in any workload?

A: Yes, in the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX A3000 Mobile is relatively competitive. It scores 79091, which is only 3.1% lower than the W7600’s 81528. This suggests that in some compute scenarios, the NVIDIA card can narrow the gap significantly.

Q: How does the RTX A3000 Mobile compare to its own rivals?

A: The RTX A3000 Mobile’s average score of 70140 places it in the 91st percentile. Its closest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (delta 0.2%), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (delta 0.4%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE (delta -1%), indicating it is within a narrow performance band of those older or lower-tier cards.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a production status of "Active," while the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile is listed as "End-of-life." This suggests the W7600 is a current product, whereas the A3000 Mobile is a legacy part.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor density?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600, built on a 6 nm process, has a transistor density of 65.2M / mm². The NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile, on an 8 nm process, has a lower density of 44.4M / mm², despite having more total transistors.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is the clear winner in raw performance. It dominates the Vulkan workload with a 51.5% lead, demonstrating a major architectural advantage for modern graphics APIs. Its higher average benchmark score (87108 vs. 70140) and superior 93rd percentile ranking also make it the stronger choice for general compute tasks where maximum throughput is the goal. The W7600’s wins in both head-to-head tests mean it is the better option for any user who prioritizes sheer processing power.

The NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile’s win is less about performance and more about its specific characteristics. Its only relative strength in the data is its closer showing in OpenCL, where it trails by just 3.1%. This indicates that in compute workloads using OpenCL, the A3000 Mobile is not dramatically slower, making it a more viable option for legacy applications. Furthermore, its significantly lower TDP of 70 W, compared to the W7600’s 130 W, makes it the clear choice for portable workstations where battery life and thermal management are critical. It is a card for sustained, moderate compute loads in a mobile chassis, not for maxing out frame rates or render times.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ substantially in their core specifications. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2440 MHz, while the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile has a much lower base of 600 MHz and boost of 1230 MHz. The W7600 also has a higher memory clock at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus the A3000 Mobile’s 1375 MHz (11 Gbps effective). The memory configurations also differ: the W7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the A3000 Mobile has 6 GB on a 192-bit bus with 264.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The W7600 features more ROPs and TMUs are identical (64 and 128, respectively), but the A3000 Mobile has more shading units (4096 vs. 2048) and includes 128 tensor cores, which the W7600 lacks. The W7600 is a single-slot card with a 1x 6-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 300 W, while the A3000 Mobile has no power connectors and is portable-device dependent. The W7600 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the A3000 Mobile uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The W7600 has four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, whereas the A3000 Mobile’s outputs are "Portable Device Dependent."

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is significant. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 204 mm² and 13,300 million transistors. Its codename is "Hotpink Bonefish" and it is part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. In contrast, the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile is based on the Ampere architecture, manufactured on an 8 nm process at Samsung, with a much larger die size of 392 mm² and 17,400 million transistors. It belongs to the Ampere-MW (Ax000) generation. The W7600’s smaller, denser process node (65.2M / mm² vs. 44.4M / mm²) allows it to achieve higher clock speeds and efficiency. The W7600 has 32 RT cores, which is the same number as the A3000 Mobile, but the RTX card also includes 128 tensor cores for AI workloads, a feature absent on the AMD card. The FP32 compute performance is starkly different, with the W7600 delivering 19.99 TFLOPS versus the A3000 Mobile’s 10.08 TFLOPS. The W7600 also leads in pixel rate (156.2 GPixel/s vs. 78.72 GPixel/s) and texture rate (312.3 GTexel/s vs. 157.4 GTexel/s). Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the data, the choice is clear for most users. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is the superior performer. Its victory in both head-to-head benchmarks, particularly the crushing 51.5% lead in Vulkan, and its higher average score (87108 vs. 70140) make it the go-to choice for professional work where rendering speed, compute throughput, and API support are paramount. It is a current, active product with a 93rd percentile ranking, placing it in the company of much more expensive workstation cards. Its higher TDP is a non-issue for desktop workstations.

The NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile is not without merit, but its appeal is narrow. Its lower TDP of 70 W and lack of power connectors make it the only logical choice for a mobile workstation. Its closer performance in OpenCL (within 3.1%) shows it can still handle legacy compute tasks respectably. However, its "End-of-life" status and significantly lower performance in modern APIs like Vulkan make it a poor choice for future-proofing. The data suggests that users with a desktop workflow should choose the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 without hesitation. Only those who absolutely require a low-power, mobile solution should consider the RTX A3000 Mobile, and they should be prepared for a substantial performance compromise in Vulkan-based applications.