AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA H20 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark results for the AMD Radeon PRO W7600, while the NVIDIA H20 currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible for compute workloads. The AMD card delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 81,528 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 92,688, producing an average benchmark score of 87,108. The NVIDIA H20 sits at an average benchmark score of 0, with a percentile ranking of 50 against all GPUs, whereas the AMD card ranks in the 93rd percentile.

The Radeon PRO W7600 shows a clear performance tier relative to its nearest rivals in the database. It trails the NVIDIA RTX A4500 by 5 percent in average score (87,108 vs 91,671), and sits 4.4 percent behind the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile (87,108 vs 91,134). Against the NVIDIA Quadro GP100, the AMD card is nearly even, with a delta of negative 0.4 percent (87,108 vs 87,445). The AMD card leads the NVIDIA CMP 40HX by 1.7 percent (87,108 vs 85,637). These figures indicate that the Radeon PRO W7600 occupies a competitive mid-range position, landing within a tight band of performance around these rival cards.

For the NVIDIA H20, no benchmark scores exist in the database, so there are no wins to attribute to either side in a head-to-head sense. The AMD card has two recorded benchmarks, both of which show strong results. Its Vulkan score of 92,688 exceeds its OpenCL score of 81,528 by roughly 13.7 percent, suggesting that the RDNA 3.0 architecture performs particularly well under Vulkan workloads. The H20, by contrast, has no recorded data, leaving its compute performance unquantified in this database.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins in every measurable benchmark category because it is the only one of the two with recorded scores. Its Geekbench OpenCL result of 81,528 and Geekbench Vulkan result of 92,688 both contribute to an average of 87,108. The card’s 93rd percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates that it outperforms the vast majority of recorded graphics cards in the database. This is a strong showing for a workstation-oriented GPU with a 130 W thermal design power, a single-slot footprint, and a 6-pin power connector.

The NVIDIA H20 cannot claim any benchmark wins due to the absence of recorded scores. Its 50th percentile ranking and average score of 0 place it at the median of the database, but this reflects missing data rather than measured performance. The H20 is a server-oriented module with an SXM form factor, no display outputs, and a 500 W thermal design power. Its intended workload profile appears to be data center compute, likely emphasizing tensor operations given its 312 tensor cores, but the database does not contain any benchmark results to confirm this.

For use-case analysis, the AMD card’s recorded wins position it as a viable option for OpenCL and Vulkan compute tasks. The Vulkan score advantage over OpenCL suggests that applications leveraging Vulkan’s lower overhead may see better performance. The H20, lacking any recorded data, cannot be assessed for specific workloads in this database. Its hardware specifications, such as 96 GB of HBM3 memory and 4.03 TB/s of bandwidth, indicate a design aimed at large memory footprint tasks, but without benchmark scores, no performance claims can be made.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon PRO W7600?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has an average benchmark score of 87,108, based on a Geekbench OpenCL score of 81,528 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 92,688.

Q: Does the NVIDIA H20 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the NVIDIA H20 has no recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 compare to the NVIDIA RTX A4500?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 trails the NVIDIA RTX A4500 by 5 percent in average benchmark score, with 87,108 versus 91,671.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 ranks in the 93rd percentile among all GPUs, while the NVIDIA H20 ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Which GPU has a higher Geekbench Vulkan score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a Geekbench Vulkan score of 92,688. The NVIDIA H20 has no recorded Vulkan score.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 perform against the NVIDIA CMP 40HX?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 leads the NVIDIA CMP 40HX by 1.7 percent in average benchmark score, with 87,108 versus 85,637.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ substantially across nearly every specification field. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA H20 uses 96 GB of HBM3 memory on a 6144-bit bus, delivering 4.03 TB/s of bandwidth. Memory clock rates also differ: the AMD card runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the H20 runs at 1313 MHz with 5.3 Gbps effective.

Compute unit counts diverge sharply. The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The H20 has 9984 shading units, 312 texture mapping units, and only 24 raster output units. Ray tracing cores number 32 on the AMD card, while the H20 lists no ray tracing cores but includes 312 tensor cores, which the AMD card does not have.

Clock speeds show the AMD card boosting to 2440 MHz from a base of 1720 MHz, while the H20 boosts to 1980 MHz from a base of 1830 MHz. Pixel and texture rates also differ: the AMD card delivers 156.2 GPixel/s and 312.3 GTexel/s, whereas the H20 delivers 47.52 GPixel/s and 617.8 GTexel/s. Floating point performance sees the AMD card at 19.99 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.98 TFLOPS FP16, while the H20 reaches 39.54 TFLOPS FP32 and 79.07 TFLOPS FP16.

Power and physical specifications are strongly divergent. The AMD card has a 130 W thermal design power, a single-slot width, a 1x 6-pin power connector, and a suggested power supply of 300 W. The H20 has a 500 W thermal design power, an SXM module form factor, no listed power connectors, and a suggested power supply of 900 W. The AMD card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the H20 uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs differ as well: the AMD card has 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the H20 has no outputs.

Transistor and die data also differ. The AMD card uses 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die with a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The H20 uses 80,000 million transistors on an 814 mm² die with a density of 98.3 million per mm². Process nodes differ, with the AMD card on 6 nm and the H20 on 5 nm, both fabricated by TSMC.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The NVIDIA H20 uses the Hopper architecture with the GH100 chip, belonging to the Server Hopper generation. The H20 has no codename listed, while the AMD card’s codename is provided.

The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA H20 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, indicating no graphics API support in the recorded data. This reflects the H20’s server orientation, which lacks display outputs and traditional graphics rendering capabilities.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The AMD card uses GDDR6 memory, which is common for workstation and consumer graphics cards. The H20 uses HBM3, a high-bandwidth memory type suited for data center workloads. The memory bus width difference is extreme: 128-bit for the AMD card versus 6144-bit for the H20. This explains the bandwidth gap, with the H20 offering 4.03 TB/s compared to the AMD card’s 288.0 GB/s.

The presence of tensor cores on the H20, totaling 312, indicates a focus on AI and machine learning tasks. The AMD card has no tensor cores but includes 32 ray tracing cores, suggesting a focus on graphics rendering and ray-traced workloads. The H20’s lack of ray tracing cores reinforces its compute-centric design.

Production status for both is Active, but release dates differ. The AMD card was released on 2023-08-02, while the H20 was released on 2024-01-31. The AMD card’s predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, and it has no successor listed. The H20’s predecessor is Server Ada, and its successor is Server Blackwell.

Physical dimensions are only recorded for the AMD card, which measures 241 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The H20 has no recorded dimensions. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 599 USD, while the H20 has no launch MSRP listed.