AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D Comparison

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D occupy different corners of the GPU market, yet the benchmark data places them in the same performance percentile. Both cards achieve a 94th percentile ranking among all GPUs, but the similarity ends there. The Radeon PRO W7600 is a professional workstation card built on RDNA 3.0, while the GeForce RTX 5090 D is a flagship consumer Blackwell part. The head-to-head benchmark results show a decisive victory for the NVIDIA card, but the context of those results matters for anyone choosing between these two very different products.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two cards share only two common benchmark results in the data: Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan. In both tests, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D dominates. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5090 D scores 375966 against the Radeon PRO W7600’s 81528, a delta of -78.3% from the AMD card’s perspective. That means the NVIDIA card delivers roughly 4.6 times the raw compute performance in this OpenCL workload. The Vulkan result is similarly lopsided: the RTX 5090 D scores 376915 versus 90174 for the W7600, a -76.1% delta. Again, the NVIDIA card is about 4.2 times faster.

These are massive margins. The Radeon PRO W7600’s average benchmark score across all its tests is 85851, while the RTX 5090 D’s average is 84241. That puts the RTX 5090 D behind the W7600 by 1.9% in overall average score, despite winning both shared tests outright. The explanation is the test selection: the W7600 only has Geekbench results in its benchmark list, while the RTX 5090 D has ten results, including several Passmark tests where it scores relatively low (e.g., Passmark DirectX 10 at 231, DirectX 12 at 219). Those low Passmark scores drag down the RTX 5090 D’s average, even though its two Geekbench scores are far higher than the W7600’s.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each card clarifies the picture. The RTX 5090 D’s closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, with a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 5090 D is essentially tied with the non-D variant. The RTX 5090 D also sits within 1.2% of the AMD Radeon PRO W6600 and within 1.6% of the NVIDIA CMP 40HX. The W7600, meanwhile, is 0.2% ahead of the CMP 40HX and 1.8% ahead of the RTX 5090. So in the aggregate benchmark database, these two cards are peers, but the individual shared tests reveal a chasm in compute capability.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: if raw compute performance in Geekbench OpenCL or Vulkan is the priority, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is the only choice. It is roughly 4 to 4.6 times faster than the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 in those workloads. No amount of architectural nuance changes that result. The RTX 5090 D also has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory versus 8 GB of GDDR6, a 512-bit bus versus 128-bit, and 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s. For any workload that scales with memory capacity or bandwidth, the NVIDIA card wins by an even wider margin than the compute benchmarks suggest.

However, the Radeon PRO W7600 is not without merit. It has a lower TDP of 130 W versus 575 W, a single-slot design versus dual-slot, and a 6-pin power connector versus a 16-pin. It also uses PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 5.0 x16, which means it can fit into older systems without issue. The W7600’s average benchmark score is actually higher than the RTX 5090 D’s, and it sits in the same 94th percentile. For a professional workstation that does not need extreme compute but does need reliability, lower power draw, and a compact form factor, the W7600 is the practical pick. The RTX 5090 D is for those who need maximum performance and have the power supply (950 W suggested) and chassis space (304 mm length) to accommodate it.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D uses the GB202 chip on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, yielding a density of 122.9M per mm². That is nearly double the transistor density and nearly seven times the transistor count.

The RTX 5090 D has 21760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores. The W7600 has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores, with no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA card’s FP32 performance is 104.8 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is also 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The AMD card delivers 19.99 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.98 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The RTX 5090 D also has a much higher pixel rate at 423.6 GPixel/s versus 156.2 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s versus 312.3 GTexel/s.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The W7600 has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost of 2440 MHz, while the RTX 5090 D has a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz. The AMD card actually boosts slightly higher, but it has far fewer cores. Memory clocks also differ: the W7600 runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) while the RTX 5090 D runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The NVIDIA card’s much wider bus and newer GDDR7 memory deliver the massive bandwidth advantage.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has an average benchmark score of 85851, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D has an average of 84241. The W7600 is 1.9% higher.

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5090 D in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The RTX 5090 D scores 375966 versus the W7600’s 81528, a delta of -78.3%, meaning the NVIDIA card is about 4.6 times faster.

Q: What are the memory capacities of each card?

A: The Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the GeForce RTX 5090 D has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The Radeon PRO W7600 has a boost clock of 2440 MHz, which is slightly higher than the RTX 5090 D’s 2407 MHz boost.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two cards?

A: The Radeon PRO W7600 has a TDP of 130 W, while the GeForce RTX 5090 D has a TDP of 575 W.

Q: Do both cards support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D wins in every shared benchmark, and its specifications suggest wins in any memory-bound or compute-heavy task. The 32 GB of GDDR7 memory with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth is suited for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and AI workloads that require tensor cores. The 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores make it a candidate for ray tracing and deep learning inference. With a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s, it handles high-resolution rendering and heavy filtering without bottlenecking. The FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS is over five times the W7600’s, so any scientific simulation or rendering task that scales with FP32 will favor the NVIDIA card.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins in efficiency and practicality. Its 130 W TDP means it can be cooled by a single-slot design, and its 300 W suggested PSU is far more modest than the 950 W required for the RTX 5090 D. The W7600’s 6-pin power connector is universally compatible, whereas the 16-pin connector on the RTX 5090 D may require an adapter or a newer power supply. The W7600’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is more forgiving of older motherboards, and its 241 mm length fits in smaller cases. The W7600 also has 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the RTX 5090 D has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, so the AMD card offers more DisplayPort connections for multi-monitor professional setups. The W7600’s FP16 performance of 39.98 TFLOPS is still substantial for a 130 W card, making it capable for certain compute tasks without the power overhead.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every specification. The W7600 uses a 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors, while the RTX 5090 D uses a 5 nm process with 92,200 million transistors. The W7600’s die is 204 mm² versus 750 mm². Memory size is 8 GB versus 32 GB, type is GDDR6 versus GDDR7, bus width is 128 bit versus 512 bit, and bandwidth is 288.0 GB/s versus 1.79 TB/s. Shading units are 2048 versus 21760, TMUs are 128 versus 680, ROPs are 64 versus 176, RT cores are 32 versus 170, and tensor cores are absent on the W7600 versus 680 on the RTX 5090 D. Pixel rate is 156.2 GPixel/s versus 423.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 312.3 GTexel/s versus 1,636.8 GTexel/s. FP32 is 19.99 TFLOPS versus 104.8 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 39.98 TFLOPS versus 104.8 TFLOPS. TDP is 130 W versus 575 W, slot width is single-slot versus dual-slot, power connectors are 1x 6-pin versus 1x 16-pin, suggested PSU is 300 W versus 950 W, and bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 5.0 x16. The W7600 measures 241 mm long and 115 mm high, while the RTX 5090 D measures 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 48 mm wide. The release dates are 2023-08-02 for the W7600 and 2025-01-29 for the RTX 5090 D. The launch MSRP is 599 USD for the AMD card and 2,299 USD for the NVIDIA card.