AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA B200 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a single head-to-head benchmark between the NVIDIA B200 and the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 in Geekbench OpenCL. The NVIDIA B200 delivers a score of 345,482, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 scores 81,528. This results in a delta of 323.8% in favor of the NVIDIA B200, meaning the B200 outperforms the W7600 by more than four times in this compute workload.

Context from the database clarifies how dominant that margin is. The B200 sits at the 100th percentile among all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC, which is 6.6% faster, and the NVIDIA H200 NVL, which is 3.2% slower. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600, by contrast, sits at the 93rd percentile and trades blows with workstation and mining cards like the NVIDIA RTX A4500, which is 5% faster, and the NVIDIA Quadro GP100, which is effectively tied at 0.4% slower.

The scale of the OpenCL gap is not merely a statistical lead; it reflects a fundamentally different performance class. The B200's 345,482 OpenCL score is 323.8% higher than the W7600's 81,528, a margin that dwarfs the differences seen among the B200's own nearest rivals, where deltas range only from -6.6% to 16.8%. For the W7600, its rival deltas are similarly tight, ranging from -5% to 1.7%, confirming that the B200 and W7600 occupy entirely separate tiers of compute capability.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA B200 wins in raw compute throughput, which is the only benchmark category recorded in the head-to-head data. Its OpenCL score of 345,482 places it at the top of the database's GPU rankings, ahead of the AMD Instinct MI300X by 8.6% and the NVIDIA L40S by 16.8%. This makes the B200 the clear choice for workloads that depend on massive parallel compute, such as large-scale AI training or scientific simulation, where the 323.8% advantage over the W7600 would translate into substantially shorter processing times.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins in practical workstation functionality, even though it loses the compute benchmark outright. It is a single-slot card with 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, making it suitable for multi-monitor professional visualization. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest but workable for desktop-class tasks. The W7600 also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, giving it a full modern API feature set for professional software. The B200, by contrast, has no display outputs and no recorded API support, so it cannot drive a monitor or run interactive graphics workloads at all.

The data indicates a clear split: the B200 is a compute accelerator with no display capability, while the W7600 is a workstation GPU with display outputs and a complete graphics API stack. For compute-heavy server workloads, the B200 wins by a wide margin. For desktop professional use, the W7600 is the only one of the two that can output video.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA B200 is built on the Blackwell architecture using the GB100 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 104,000 million transistors. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors and a die size of 204 mm².

Memory configurations are starkly different. The B200 has 90 GB of HBM3e memory on a 4096-bit bus, delivering 4.10 TB/s of bandwidth. The W7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s. The B200's memory bandwidth is more than 14 times higher, which is a decisive factor in memory-bound compute workloads.

Compute unit counts also diverge heavily. The B200 has 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 592 tensor cores. The W7600 has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores. The B200's FP32 throughput is 74.45 TFLOPS versus 19.99 TFLOPS for the W7600. In FP16, the B200 reaches 1,191.2 TFLOPS with a 16:1 ratio, while the W7600 reaches 39.98 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The W7600 runs at a base of 1720 MHz and boosts to 2440 MHz, while the B200 runs at 700 MHz base and 1965 MHz boost. Despite lower clocks, the B200's massive parallel width gives it the compute advantage. Pixel rates also favor the W7600: 156.2 GPixel/s versus 47.16 GPixel/s for the B200, reflecting the W7600's rasterization-oriented design. Texture rates favor the B200 at 1,163.3 GTexel/s versus 312.3 GTexel/s.

Power and physical characteristics differ accordingly. The B200 has a TDP of 1000 W and requires a 1400 W suggested PSU, mounted as an SXM Module. The W7600 has a TDP of 130 W, a 300 W suggested PSU, and a single-slot form factor with a 6-pin power connector. The B200 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the W7600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The B200 has no display outputs; the W7600 has 4x DisplayPort 2.1. The W7600 measures 241 mm in length and 115 mm in height.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The NVIDIA B200 scores 345,482, which is 323.8% higher than the AMD Radeon PRO W7600's score of 81,528.

Q: Does the NVIDIA B200 support display outputs?

A: No, the B200 has no display outputs. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Q: What is the memory capacity of each card?

A: The NVIDIA B200 has 90 GB of HBM3e memory with 4.10 TB/s bandwidth. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The NVIDIA B200 has a TDP of 1000 W and a suggested PSU of 1400 W. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a TDP of 130 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W.

Q: Which card can run modern graphics APIs like Vulkan?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA B200 has no recorded API support.

Q: Where does each card rank among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA B200 is at the 100th percentile, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is at the 93rd percentile.

The Verdict

The data points to two completely different products. The NVIDIA B200 is a compute-first accelerator with 74.45 TFLOPS of FP32, 1,191.2 TFLOPS of FP16, 90 GB of HBM3e, and a 1000 W TDP. It has no display outputs, so it cannot be used for interactive graphics. Its OpenCL score of 345,482 puts it at the top of the database, 323.8% ahead of the W7600 and 8.6% ahead of the AMD Instinct MI300X. Anyone needing maximum compute throughput for server workloads should choose the B200, provided the 1400 W suggested PSU and SXM Module form factor are acceptable.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation GPU with a 130 W TDP, single-slot design, 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, and full support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its 19.99 TFLOPS of FP32 and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory are suited for professional desktop tasks like CAD or media work. It is the only viable choice for users who need a monitor attached or who require a low-power, single-slot GPU. The W7600's 81528 OpenCL score trails the B200 by a wide margin, but the B200 cannot display anything at all, so the W7600 wins decisively in any use case requiring visual output.

For compute-only deployments, the B200 is the clear winner. For workstation desktop use, the W7600 is the only option that fits. The database shows no overlap in their intended roles.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA B200 | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell | RDNA 3.0 |

| Chip | GB100 | Navi 33 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 104,000 million | 13,300 million |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 204 mm² |

| Base Clock | 700 MHz | 1720 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1965 MHz | 2440 MHz |

| Memory Size | 90 GB | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | HBM3e | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 4096 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 4.10 TB/s | 288.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 18,944 | 2,048 |

| TMUs | 592 | 128 |

| ROPs | 24 | 64 |

| RT Cores | Not recorded | 32 |

| Tensor Cores | 592 | Not recorded |

| FP32 Performance | 74.45 TFLOPS | 19.99 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 1,191.2 TFLOPS (16:1) | 39.98 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 47.16 GPixel/s | 156.2 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 1,163.3 GTexel/s | 312.3 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 1000 W | 130 W |

| Slot Width | SXM Module | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | Not recorded | 1x 6-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 800 W | 300 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| DirectX Support | Not recorded | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL Support | Not recorded | 4.6 |

| Vulkan Support | Not recorded | 1.4 |

| Length | Not recorded | 241 mm, 9.5 inches |

| Height | Not recorded | 115 mm, 4.5 inches |

| Release Date | Not recorded | 2023-08-02 |

| Predecessor | Server Hopper | Radeon Pro Vega |

| Successor | Server Rubin | Not recorded |