AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

CORE STATE Navi 21
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1967 MHz
TDP 400 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

CMP 90HX

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 10 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1710 MHz
TDP 320 W
BUS WIDTH 320 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_metal
157,365
N/A
geekbench_opencl
124,335
69,000
geekbench_vulkan
125,622
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and the NVIDIA CMP 90HX occupy completely different corners of the GPU market, and the benchmark data reflects that divergence. The AMD card is the clear performance leader, posting an average benchmark score of 135,774 against the NVIDIA card's 69,000. That places the W6800X Duo in the 96th percentile of all GPUs, while the CMP 90HX sits in the 90th percentile.

For anyone whose workload involves Metal, OpenCL, or Vulkan compute tasks, the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is the only sensible choice. Its Geekbench Metal score of 157,365 and Vulkan score of 125,622 are simply in another league. The NVIDIA CMP 90HX, by contrast, is a mining-oriented card with no display outputs, no Vulkan benchmark recorded, and only a single OpenCL score of 69,000 to its name. The data shows an 80.2% advantage for the AMD card in the only head-to-head test available, Geekbench OpenCL.

The CMP 90HX does have one advantage: its architecture supports tensor cores, 200 of them, which the AMD card lacks entirely. But with no benchmark data to quantify that advantage, and given that the card cannot even output a display signal, its practical appeal is extremely narrow. The verdict is straightforward: pick the W6800X Duo for any general-purpose compute, workstation, or content creation role. Pick the CMP 90HX only if the specific task is mining and the lack of display outputs is not a limitation.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers, different foundries, and different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo uses the Navi 21 chip built on RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 7 nm process. It packs 26,800 million transistors onto a 520 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 51.5M per mm². The NVIDIA CMP 90HX uses the GA102 chip built on Ampere architecture, manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process. It contains 28,300 million transistors across a larger 628 mm² die, but its transistor density is lower at 45.1M per mm².

The AMD card offers 3,840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It also includes 60 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores. The NVIDIA card counters with 6,400 shading units, 200 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, along with 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores. The shading unit advantage for NVIDIA is substantial, nearly 67% more, but the AMD card compensates with higher clock speeds and a different compute layout.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical. The production status for both is end-of-life, and their release dates are nearly the same, the AMD card on August 2, 2021, and the NVIDIA card on July 27, 2021. The AMD card belongs to the Radeon Pro Mac generation, while the NVIDIA card belongs to the Mining GPUs generation, which explains their divergent feature sets.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison in the database is Geekbench OpenCL, and it is a decisive victory for the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo. The AMD card scores 124,335, while the NVIDIA CMP 90HX scores 69,000. That is an 80.2% delta, meaning the AMD card delivers nearly double the OpenCL compute performance of the NVIDIA card. This is the single most important number in the entire comparison, as it establishes the performance hierarchy with no ambiguity.

Beyond the head-to-head, the AMD card's other benchmark scores reinforce its dominance. Its Geekbench Metal score of 157,365 is the highest recorded metric for either card, and its Vulkan score of 125,622 is nearly identical to its OpenCL result. The NVIDIA card has no Metal or Vulkan scores recorded, so the AMD card wins those categories by default. In the broader database context, the AMD card's average score of 135,774 puts it 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W6800, 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA A10M, and 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. It trails the AMD Radeon PRO V620 by 0.5%, but that gap is trivial.

The NVIDIA CMP 90HX, with its average score of 69,000, sits just 0.3% ahead of the Intel Arc A770 and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25. It trails the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 by 1.2% and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 by 1.4%. In other words, the CMP 90HX performs at roughly the level of a mid-range card from several generations ago, while the W6800X Duo competes with modern workstation flagships.

Specification Differences

The specification sheet tells the story of two cards designed for entirely different purposes. The AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo uses 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA CMP 90HX uses 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has the bandwidth advantage, 48.6% more, but the AMD card has more than three times the memory capacity.

Clock speeds favor the AMD card. Its base clock is 1,800 MHz with a boost of 1,967 MHz, compared to the NVIDIA card's 1,500 MHz base and 1,710 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ, with the AMD card running at 2,000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, while the NVIDIA card runs at 1,188 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed. The higher memory transfer rate for NVIDIA compensates for its lower raw clock.

Compute throughput numbers are mixed. The NVIDIA card has the higher FP32 rating at 21.89 TFLOPS, compared to the AMD card's 15.11 TFLOPS. However, the AMD card achieves 30.21 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, while the NVIDIA card is locked at 21.89 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate favors AMD at 188.8 GPixel/s versus 136.8 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate also favors AMD at 472.1 GTexel/s versus 342.0 GTexel/s.

Power and physical specifications differ substantially. The AMD card has a TDP of 400 W and requires an 800 W power supply, while the NVIDIA card has a TDP of 320 W and requires a 700 W PSU. The AMD card is a quad-slot design measuring 267 mm in length and 120 mm in height, while the NVIDIA card is a dual-slot design measuring 285 mm in length and 112 mm in height. The NVIDIA card uses two 8-pin power connectors, while the AMD card's connector type is not specified in the database.

The bus interfaces could not be more different. The AMD card uses Apple MPX, which explains its "Radeon Pro Mac" generation label, and it offers display outputs including one HDMI 2.1 and four Thunderbolt ports. The NVIDIA card uses a PCIe 1.0 x4 interface, a severely limited bus for a modern GPU, and it has no display outputs at all. This is the defining specification difference: one card is a professional workstation GPU with full display capabilities, the other is a mining card with zero display outputs.

FAQ

Q: Which card has better overall compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo. Its average benchmark score is 135,774, which is 96.8% higher than the NVIDIA CMP 90HX's 69,000. In the direct OpenCL comparison, the AMD card leads by 80.2%.

Q: Does the NVIDIA CMP 90HX support display output?

A: No. The NVIDIA CMP 90HX has no display outputs whatsoever. The AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo, by contrast, provides one HDMI 2.1 port and four Thunderbolt ports.

Q: How do the two cards compare in memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The AMD card has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 256-bit bus. The NVIDIA card has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory with 760.3 GB/s bandwidth on a 320-bit bus. The NVIDIA card has higher bandwidth, but the AMD card has 220% more memory capacity.

Q: Which card has the higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA CMP 90HX. It delivers 21.89 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 15.11 TFLOPS for the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo. However, the AMD card achieves 30.21 TFLOPS in FP16, while the NVIDIA card remains at 21.89 TFLOPS.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo has a 400 W TDP and requires an 800 W power supply. The NVIDIA CMP 90HX has a 320 W TDP and requires a 700 W power supply. The NVIDIA card is also physically smaller, taking up two slots instead of four.

Q: Which card is better for gaming or general workstation use?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is the only viable option for general use. It has display outputs, supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and delivers far higher benchmark scores. The NVIDIA CMP 90HX cannot output video at all, making it unsuitable for any interactive workload.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro W6800X Duo
CMP 90HX
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,840
6,400 +66.7%
Shaders
3,840
6,400 +66.7%
TMUs
240
200 -16.7%
ROPs
96
80 -16.7%
Compute Units
60
—
SM Count
—
50
Clocks
Base Clock
1800 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1967 MHz
1710 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1188 MHz 19 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
32 GB
10 GB
VRAM (MB)
32,768
10,240 -68.8%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
256 bit
320 bit
Bandwidth
512.0 GB/s
760.3 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
5 MB
L3 Cache
128 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
188.8 GPixel/s
136.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
472.1 GTexel/s
342.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
15.11 TFLOPS
21.89 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
944.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
342.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
30.21 TFLOPS (2:1)
21.89 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
60
50 -16.7%
Tensor Cores
—
200
Power
TDP
400 W
320 W
TDP (W)
400
320 -20.0%
Suggested PSU
800 W
700 W
Power Connectors
—
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 21
GA102
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac (Navi II Series)
Mining GPUs
Process Size
7 nm
8 nm
Transistors
26,800 million
28,300 million
Die Size
520 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
51.5M / mm²
45.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Quad-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
285 mm 11.2 inches
Height
120 mm 4.7 inches
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.14x Thunderbolt
No outputs
Bus Interface
Apple MPX
PCIe 1.0 x4
Other
Launch Price
4,999 USD
—
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
View Radeon Pro W6800X Duo Details View CMP 90HX Details