AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs Intel Arc A570M Comparison

The Intel Arc A570M and AMD Radeon Pro W5700X represent two very different interpretations of a professional-grade GPU. The Arc A570M is a mobile-first, power-efficient part from Intel’s Alchemist generation, while the W5700X is a desktop workstation card built for Apple’s MPX ecosystem. Benchmark results show a clear split: the Intel part wins the sole shared head-to-head test decisively, yet the AMD card offers a broader feature set and substantially more memory. The data indicates that these are not direct competitors in the traditional sense, but rather solutions tailored to distinct workloads and platforms.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc A570M wins the only direct benchmark comparison available in the data. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the Arc A570M scores 58,239 points, which is 32.9% higher than the Radeon Pro W5700X’s score of 43,810. This is a significant margin, placing the Intel part in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, compared to the AMD card’s 87th percentile. The Arc A570M’s victory is not marginal; it represents a substantial lead in raw compute throughput within this specific API.

The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X wins in areas that the benchmark data does not directly measure but which are critical for professional use. It offers 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, double the Arc A570M’s 8 GB, with a 256-bit bus and 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus the Intel part’s 128-bit bus and 224.0 GB/s. This makes the W5700X the clear choice for large datasets, high-resolution textures, or complex compute workloads that exceed the Arc A570M’s memory capacity. Furthermore, the W5700X boasts a higher boost clock of 2040 MHz and a peak FP32 throughput of 10.44 TFLOPS, which is nearly double the Arc A570M’s 5.325 TFLOPS. While the OpenCL result contradicts this raw spec advantage, the AMD card’s architecture clearly targets peak throughput in supported environments.

The Arc A570M, conversely, has a much lower TDP of 75 W versus the W5700X’s 205 W, and its IGP slot width suggests it is designed for compact, power-constrained systems. This makes it the winner in efficiency and portability, while the W5700X’s quad-slot design and 550 W suggested PSU indicate a desktop workstation with ample cooling and power headroom.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The Intel Arc A570M uses the DG2-256 chip based on the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X uses the Navi 10 chip based on RDNA 1.0, fabricated on a 7 nm process, also at TSMC. It packs 10,300 million transistors on a 251 mm² die, with a density of 41.0M per mm². While the Intel chip is denser, the AMD chip is older and larger in feature set.

The Intel part includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the AMD card, which lists no RT cores. This gives the Arc A570M a hardware advantage in ray-traced workloads, provided the software supports it. The AMD card compensates with a wider execution footprint: 2,560 shading units and 160 texture mapping units (TMUs) versus the Intel’s 2,048 shaders and 128 TMUs. Both have 64 ROPs, but the AMD card’s higher clock speeds (1243 MHz base, 2040 MHz boost) drive its fill rates to 130.6 GPixel/s and 326.4 GTexel/s, compared to the Intel’s 83.20 GPixel/s and 166.4 GTexel/s.

Memory and interface differ sharply. The Arc A570M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus, while the W5700X uses the proprietary Apple MPX interface. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), indicating newer feature support in the latter. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, but the Intel card has a more modern API baseline.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only shared benchmark is Geekbench OpenCL, and the result is a decisive win for the Intel Arc A570M. The Intel card scores 58,239, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 43,810. This yields a 32.9% advantage for the Intel part. This is a substantial gap, especially considering the AMD card’s higher shader count and clock speeds. The data suggests that the Arc A570M’s architecture is more efficient in OpenCL workloads, or that the AMD card’s drivers or platform limitations hinder its performance in this specific test.

Contextualizing the scores against nearest rivals reinforces the Intel win. The Arc A570M’s score of 58,239 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT’s 58,392, a delta of just -0.3%. It also edges out the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085, +0.3%) and the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528, -0.5%). This places the mobile Intel GPU in the same performance bracket as high-end desktop cards from the previous generation, at least in OpenCL.

The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X’s OpenCL score of 43,810 is closer to lower-tier rivals. It sits 1.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 (54,247) and the RTX 4080 SUPER (54,209), but 1.6% below the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698) and 1.7% below the AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757). This shows that while the W5700X has a strong average benchmark score (54,828), its OpenCL result is notably weaker than its peers, suggesting a platform or driver limitation in that API.

The AMD card’s other benchmark results—Geekbench Metal at 75,427 and Geekbench Vulkan at 45,246—show a different picture. The Metal score is significantly higher than its OpenCL score, indicating that the W5700X performs much better in Apple’s native Metal API. This is consistent with its design for Mac Pro systems.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher raw FP32 compute throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X has a peak FP32 rate of 10.44 TFLOPS, which is nearly double the Intel Arc A570M’s 5.325 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A570M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A570M includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, a feature the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X does not list.

Q: Which card offers more memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X offers 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is double the Intel Arc A570M’s 224.0 GB/s.

Q: In the shared Geekbench OpenCL test, what is the performance difference?

A: The Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239, which is 32.9% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X’s score of 43,810.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor density?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a higher density at 42.8M transistors per mm², compared to the AMD card’s 41.0M per mm².

Q: What is the difference in their bus interfaces?

A: The Intel Arc A570M uses a standard PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X uses the proprietary Apple MPX interface.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc A570M | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | RDNA 1.0 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |

| Transistors | 11,500 million | 10,300 million |

| Die Size | 269 mm² | 251 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 42.8M / mm² | 41.0M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 900 MHz | 1243 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 2040 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560 |

| TMUs | 128 | 160 |

| ROPs | 64 | 64 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 0 |

| Pixel Rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | 130.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 166.4 GTexel/s | 326.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 5.325 TFLOPS | 10.44 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) | 20.89 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 205 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Quad-slot |

| Suggested PSU | None listed | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Apple MPX |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2023-07-31 | 2019-12-10 |

| Launch MSRP | None listed | 999 USD |