AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs Intel Arc A570M Comparison

Intel Arc A570M and AMD Radeon Pro W5500X occupy nearly identical positions in the benchmark hierarchy, yet they achieve that status through fundamentally different designs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 for the Arc A570M places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, while the Radeon Pro W5500X’s Metal score of 57,661 also lands in the 89th percentile. The delta between the two is a mere 1%, with the Arc A570M holding a 1% advantage over the Radeon Pro W5500X in their respective benchmark tests. This places both cards in a tight cluster where the Intel Arc A580 (57,756) sits between them, trailing the A570M by 0.8% and leading the W5500X by 0.2%. The NVIDIA P102-100 (57,601) and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (57,599) round out the group, each within 1.1% of the Arc A570M and 0.1% of the W5500X.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct comparison between the Intel Arc A570M and AMD Radeon Pro W5500X shows a razor-thin margin. The Arc A570M’s average benchmark score of 58,239 exceeds the W5500X’s 57,661 by exactly 578 points, which translates to a 1% advantage. In the nearestRivals data, the Arc A570M lists the W5500X as a rival with a deltaPct of 1%, while the W5500X lists the Arc A570M with a deltaPct of -1%, confirming the same relationship from both perspectives.

This 1% gap is well within typical run-to-run variance for synthetic benchmarks, meaning the two GPUs are effectively performance peers in compute workloads. The Arc A570M’s nearest rival, the Intel Arc A580, scores 57,756, which is 0.8% lower, while the W5500X’s closest rival is the NVIDIA P102-100 at 57,601, a 0.1% difference. The data shows no dominant winner in raw compute; instead, the two cards trade places within a 1.1% band that includes four other GPUs. For practical purposes, any workload that runs well on one will run comparably on the other, assuming software support exists for both architectures.

The benchmark results indicate that the Arc A570M’s advantage comes from its higher shading unit count and pixel throughput, while the W5500X counters with a higher boost clock and texture fill rate. Neither card achieves a decisive victory, and the 89th percentile ranking for both underscores their comparable standing in the broader GPU landscape.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc A570M and AMD Radeon Pro W5500X diverge sharply in their underlying architectures. The Arc A570M uses the DG2-256 chip built on the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation for Arc 5 Mobile. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, packing 11,500 million transistors into a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per mm². In contrast, the W5500X uses the Navi 14 chip on the RDNA 1.0 architecture, from the Radeon Pro Mac line in the Navi Series. It is built on a 7 nm process, also at TSMC, with 6,400 million transistors on a 158 mm² die, for a density of 40.5 million per mm².

The Arc A570M features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It also includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, a capability entirely absent from the W5500X, which lists no RT cores. The W5500X counters with 1,536 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Despite fewer shading units, the W5500X reaches a higher boost clock of 1,757 MHz versus the Arc A570M’s 1,300 MHz, and a higher base clock of 1,187 MHz versus 900 MHz. This clock advantage helps the W5500X achieve 5.398 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, slightly ahead of the Arc A570M’s 5.325 TFLOPS. In FP16, the W5500X also leads with 10.80 TFLOPS versus 10.65 TFLOPS for the Arc A570M, both using a 2:1 ratio.

Pixel and texture rates tell a more mixed story. The Arc A570M delivers 83.20 GPixel/s, significantly higher than the W5500X’s 56.22 GPixel/s, due to its double the ROP count. However, the W5500X achieves 168.7 GTexel/s, slightly ahead of the Arc A570M’s 166.4 GTexel/s, thanks to its higher clock speed offsetting fewer TMUs. Both cards share identical memory configurations: 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with 1,750 MHz memory clock (14 Gbps effective) and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The process node difference (6 nm versus 7 nm) gives the Arc A570M a modest density advantage, though the W5500X’s smaller die (158 mm² versus 269 mm²) means it uses far fewer transistors.

Power and physical design differ substantially. The Arc A570M is rated at 75 W TDP and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a slot width of IGP, making it suitable for mobile platforms. The W5500X draws 125 W TDP, is a dual-slot card, and requires a 300 W suggested PSU. The Arc A570M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the W5500X uses the Apple MPX bus interface, indicating its design for Mac Pro systems. Display outputs also differ: the Arc A570M has portable device dependent outputs, while the W5500X provides 2x HDMI 2.0b.

API support shows a generational gap. The Arc A570M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the W5500X supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both offer OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. Production status diverges as well: the Arc A570M is Active, released on 2023-07-31, while the W5500X is End-of-life, released on 2019-12-10.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 1% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X’s 57,661 in Geekbench Metal. Both GPUs rank in the 89th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Do these GPUs have the same memory configuration?

A: Yes, both the Intel Arc A570M and AMD Radeon Pro W5500X feature 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 1,750 MHz memory clock (14 Gbps effective) and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU supports ray tracing?

A: Only the Intel Arc A570M supports ray tracing, with 16 dedicated RT cores. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500X has no RT cores listed in its specifications.

Q: What is the difference in transistor count and die size?

A: The Intel Arc A570M uses 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X uses 6,400 million transistors on a 158 mm² die. Both are manufactured by TSMC, with the Arc A570M on 6 nm and the W5500X on 7 nm.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a 75 W TDP and is an IGP, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X has a 125 W TDP, is a dual-slot card, and requires a 300 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 performance?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro W5500X edges out the Intel Arc A570M in FP32, with 5.398 TFLOPS versus 5.325 TFLOPS. The W5500X also leads in FP16 with 10.80 TFLOPS versus 10.65 TFLOPS.

The Verdict

The benchmark data shows that the Intel Arc A570M and AMD Radeon Pro W5500X are essentially tied in raw compute performance, with the Arc A570M holding a 1% lead. The choice between them should be driven by platform and feature requirements rather than performance. The Arc A570M is the only option with ray tracing support (16 RT cores) and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API compatibility. It is also an active product built on a newer 6 nm process, with a much lower 75 W TDP that suits mobile or compact systems. The W5500X, despite being end-of-life, offers a higher boost clock (1,757 MHz versus 1,300 MHz) and slightly higher FP32 and FP16 throughput, along with a smaller die (158 mm² versus 269 mm²) that uses fewer transistors.

The W5500X’s Apple MPX bus interface and dual-slot form factor make it a natural fit for Mac Pro systems, while the Arc A570M’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and portable device dependent outputs target Windows mobile platforms. The W5500X also carries a launch MSRP of 599 USD, which can be stated once as a reference point. For users who need ray tracing, modern DirectX 12 Ultimate features, or lower power consumption, the Arc A570M is the data-supported choice. For those on a Mac platform or prioritizing raw FP32/FP16 compute and higher clock speeds, the W5500X holds a slight edge. Neither card offers a meaningful performance advantage over the other, so ecosystem and feature support should be the deciding factors.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc A570M | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | DG2-256 | Navi 14 |

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | RDNA 1.0 |

| Generation | Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) | Radeon Pro Mac (Navi Series) |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |

| Transistors | 11,500 million | 6,400 million |

| Die Size | 269 mm² | 158 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 42.8M / mm² | 40.5M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 900 MHz | 1187 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1757 MHz |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 1536 |

| TMUs | 128 | 96 |

| ROPs | 64 | 32 |

| RT Cores | 16 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | 56.22 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 166.4 GTexel/s | 168.7 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 5.325 TFLOPS | 5.398 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) | 10.80 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 125 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Suggested PSU | None | 300 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Apple MPX |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 2x HDMI 2.0b |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2023-07-31 | 2019-12-10 |

| Launch MSRP | None | 599 USD |