GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO V620

CORE STATE Navi 21
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T600

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1335 MHz
TDP 40 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
128,580
27,875
geekbench_vulkan
144,364
25,580
passmark_directx_10
N/A
32
passmark_directx_11
N/A
49
passmark_directx_12
N/A
25
passmark_directx_9
N/A
114
passmark_g2d
N/A
756
passmark_g3d
N/A
6,479
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
2,402

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO V620 vs NVIDIA T600

The graphics card comparison between the NVIDIA T600 card from NVIDIA and AMD's AMD Radeon PRO V620 graphics shows surprisingly matched performance. These cards trade wins across diverse titles, with no securing a definitive superiority. The benchmark figures confirms this finding. None of the GPU excels reliably. Users encounter a true decision in this matchup.

When performance is remarkably matched, price and functionality grow the deciding factors. Examine ray tracing performance, upscaling technology, power consumption, and software stability when choosing between the NVIDIA T600 card from NVIDIA and AMD's AMD Radeon PRO V620 graphics. These considerations could sway the decision. Consider broadly. The broader view is important.

If performance is so close, price and functionality become the primary variables. Look at ray tracing performance, reconstruction features, TDP, and ecosystem stability when deciding between the NVIDIA T600 card from NVIDIA and AMD's AMD Radeon PRO V620 graphics. All these elements can tip the balance. Weigh comprehensively. The larger perspective counts.

In conclusion, this comparison between the NVIDIA T600 card from NVIDIA and AMD's AMD Radeon PRO V620 graphics results in a near tie. Benchmark variations are minor and improbable to affect practical sessions. Center your decision on availability, ecosystem preferences, and particular capability priorities. The two are strong selections. This draw is actual.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PRO V620
T600
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,608
640 -86.1%
Shaders
4,608
640 -86.1%
TMUs
288
40 -86.1%
ROPs
128
32 -75.0%
Compute Units
72
SM Count
10
Clocks
Base Clock
1825 MHz
735 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1335 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
32 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
32,768
4,096 -87.5%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
512.0 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
1024 KB
L3 Cache
128 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
42.72 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
53.40 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
20.28 TFLOPS
1.709 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,267.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
53.40 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
40.55 TFLOPS (2:1)
3.418 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
72
Power
TDP
300 W
40 W
TDP (W)
300
40 -86.7%
Suggested PSU
700 W
200 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Turing
GPU Name
Navi 21
TU117
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi II Series)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
7 nm
12 nm
Transistors
26,800 million
4,700 million
Die Size
520 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
51.5M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
120 mm 4.7 inches
Outputs
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ampere
View Radeon PRO V620 Details View T600 Details