AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only directly comparable benchmark between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile and the AMD Radeon Pro 575X is Geekbench OpenCL, and the result is decisively one-sided. The RTX 5050 Mobile scores 84,171 points, while the Radeon Pro 575X manages 34,773 points. That translates to a 142.1% advantage for the NVIDIA part — the newer GPU delivers more than double the raw compute throughput in this cross-vendor test. This is not a marginal win; it is a generational gap made visible in a single metric.

Looking at the broader benchmark landscape, the RTX 5050 Mobile also holds a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,365, a test the Radeon Pro 575X has no recorded result for. Meanwhile, the AMD card posts scores in Geekbench Metal (44,655) and Geekbench Vulkan (37,919), tests absent from the NVIDIA data set. The RTX 5050 Mobile's average benchmark score of 43,268 sits well above the Radeon Pro 575X's 39,116, a difference of roughly 10.6% across their respective test suites. However, these averages are not directly comparable since they aggregate different benchmark mixes.

What stands out is how each GPU's nearest rivals frame its position. The RTX 5050 Mobile's closest competitor is the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, with a delta of 0% — essentially a tie in average score. It also trades blows with the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (+0.1% in its favor) and trails the RTX 4090 Mobile by just 0.9%. The Radeon Pro 575X, by contrast, sits within 1.1% of the Radeon Pro 580X and the GeForce MX570 A, and within 1.1% of the Radeon Pro 575. Neither GPU is an outlier in its performance tier, but the absolute numbers tell a clear story: the RTX 5050 Mobile occupies a much higher performance class.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two GPUs is enormous. The RTX 5050 Mobile is built on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the Radeon Pro 575X uses AMD's GCN 4.0 architecture on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. The transistor counts reflect this: the RTX 5050 Mobile packs 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die, giving a density of 113.4 million transistors per square millimeter. The Radeon Pro 575X contains just 5,700 million transistors spread across a larger 232 mm² die, yielding only 24.6 million per square millimeter. The Blackwell chip is nearly three times denser, which explains how it fits far more compute resources into a smaller physical footprint.

Core configurations differ sharply. The RTX 5050 Mobile has 2,560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. It also includes 20 ray tracing cores and 80 tensor cores, features entirely absent from the AMD part. The Radeon Pro 575X has fewer shading units (2,048) but more TMUs (128), with the same 32 ROPs. The extra TMUs give the AMD card a higher texture rate of 140.3 GTexel/s compared to the RTX 5050 Mobile's 120.0 GTexel/s. Yet the NVIDIA GPU's pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s outstrips the AMD's 35.07 GPixel/s. In raw FP32 throughput, the RTX 5050 Mobile reaches 7.680 TFLOPS versus 4.489 TFLOPS for the Radeon Pro 575X — a 71% advantage. Both GPUs handle FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with their FP32 rates, so the proportional gap remains identical.

Memory subsystems diverge completely. The RTX 5050 Mobile uses 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, achieving 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 575X has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a wider 256-bit bus, but only reaches 217.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA part delivers 77% more bandwidth despite half the bus width, a signal of the memory technology leap. Clock speeds are listed differently: the RTX 5050 Mobile has a base of 1020 MHz and boost of 1500 MHz, while the AMD card's core clocks are absent from the data, though its memory runs at 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective) versus the NVIDIA's 1500 MHz (24 Gbps effective). The API support also differs, with the RTX 5050 Mobile supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Radeon Pro 575X tops out at DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear winner for anyone prioritizing raw compute performance: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile. Its OpenCL score is 142.1% higher than the Radeon Pro 575X, its FP32 throughput is 71% greater, and its memory bandwidth is 77% higher. The RTX 5050 Mobile also includes ray tracing and tensor cores, which the AMD part lacks entirely. The Radeon Pro 575X is an end-of-life product from 2019, while the RTX 5050 Mobile is active and current as of mid-2025. There is no benchmark in the shared data where the AMD GPU wins.

However, the AMD card is not without its merits in specific contexts. Its higher TMU count (128 vs. 80) and correspondingly higher texture rate (140.3 GTexel/s vs. 120.0 GTexel/s) suggest it could handle certain texture-heavy workloads more efficiently, though no direct benchmark confirms this. The Radeon Pro 575X also has a wider 256-bit memory bus, which historically aids in certain compute patterns, but its older GDDR5 memory and lower clock speed negate this advantage in practice. For users locked into the Radeon Pro Mac ecosystem, the 575X's Metal score of 44,655 is its strongest data point, but that figure is still far below the RTX 5050 Mobile's OpenCL result. The verdict, strictly from the numbers, is that the RTX 5050 Mobile is the superior GPU in nearly every measurable way.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 575X |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |

| Transistors | 16,900 million | 5,700 million |

| Die Size | 149 mm² | 232 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 113.4M / mm² | 24.6M / mm² |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR5 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 80 | 128 |

| RT Cores | 20 | None |

| Tensor Cores | 80 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 35.07 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 120.0 GTexel/s | 140.3 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.680 TFLOPS | 4.489 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 50 W | 150 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-06-23 | 2019-03-17 |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has better raw compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 84,171 versus the Radeon Pro 575X's 34,773, a 142.1% difference. Its FP32 throughput is 7.680 TFLOPS compared to 4.489 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon Pro 575X support ray tracing?

A: No. The Radeon Pro 575X has no ray tracing cores or tensor cores listed in its specifications. The RTX 5050 Mobile includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores.

Q: How do their memory configurations compare?

A: The RTX 5050 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 575X has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 217.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA part has 77% more bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU is more power efficient?

A: The RTX 5050 Mobile has a 50 W TDP versus 150 W for the Radeon Pro 575X. This means the NVIDIA GPU delivers significantly higher performance at one-third the power draw.

Q: What is the release timeline for these GPUs?

A: The Radeon Pro 575X was released on 2019-03-17 and is end-of-life. The RTX 5050 Mobile was released on 2025-06-23 and is active production.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the AMD GPU wins?

A: In the head-to-head data, no. The only shared test is Geekbench OpenCL, which the RTX 5050 Mobile wins by 142.1%. The AMD card does have separate Metal and Vulkan scores, but no comparison exists for those against the NVIDIA part.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile wins in every domain where the two GPUs have directly comparable data. Its OpenCL performance is more than double that of the AMD card, making it the obvious choice for general-purpose compute workloads that rely on this API. The 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 rate versus 4.489 TFLOPS gives it a decisive edge in raw number-crunching tasks. The 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, enabled by GDDR7, positions it strongly for memory-bound applications, even though the AMD part has a wider bus. The inclusion of 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores opens up hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads that the Radeon Pro 575X cannot handle at all. The RTX 5050 Mobile also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest graphics APIs.

The AMD Radeon Pro 575X has a narrower set of advantages, but they are worth noting. Its 128 TMUs and 140.3 GTexel/s texture rate exceed the RTX 5050 Mobile's 80 TMUs and 120.0 GTexel/s, suggesting it could be more efficient in certain texture-heavy rendering paths, though this is not confirmed by any shared benchmark. The 256-bit memory bus is wider, but the older GDDR5 technology at 6.8 Gbps effective cannot compete with GDDR7 at 24 Gbps effective. The Radeon Pro 575X's Geekbench Metal score of 44,655 is its strongest individual result, and for users in the Apple ecosystem where Metal is the primary API, this GPU offers a native path. Its end-of-life status and 2019 release date mean it is a legacy product, but for specific legacy workloads or macOS compatibility, it remains a data-supported option. The RTX 5050 Mobile, however, wins on raw numbers, modern features, efficiency, and longevity.