AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Comparison

AMD Radeon Pro 575X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 occupy entirely different strata of the GPU hierarchy, separated by four years of architecture evolution and a fundamental shift in design philosophy. The data positions the RTX 4070 as an overwhelming compute and graphics powerhouse, while the Radeon Pro 575X serves as a legacy, low-power mobile solution. Benchmark results show the RTX 4070 leading by margins exceeding 77% in every shared test, yet the Radeon Pro 575X still holds a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs, highlighting how benchmark selection and driver optimization can skew perceived performance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two shared benchmark tests paint a stark picture of generational dominance. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4070 scores 154,858 against the Radeon Pro 575X’s 34,773, a delta of -77.5% from the NVIDIA card’s perspective. This is not a marginal improvement but a fundamental leap in raw compute throughput, driven by the RTX 4070’s 5,888 shading units versus 2,048 on the AMD part, and its 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 peak against 4.489 TFLOPS.

The Geekbench Vulkan result follows the same trajectory, with the RTX 4070 hitting 174,152 and the Radeon Pro 575X managing 37,919, a -78.2% delta. Vulkan’s low-level API overhead benefits the newer architecture disproportionately, as the RTX 4070’s dedicated ray tracing cores and tensor cores can be fully utilized, whereas the GCN 4.0 architecture of the Radeon Pro 575X lacks any such specialized hardware. The RTX 4070 wins both head-to-head tests, giving it a 2-0 record in direct comparisons.

Looking at the average benchmark scores, the RTX 4070 posts 37,648 across all its tested workloads, while the Radeon Pro 575X averages 39,116. This inversion occurs because the AMD card’s benchmark suite is limited to three Geekbench tests—Metal, OpenCL, and Vulkan—which are compute-heavy and may favor its unified shader design. The NVIDIA card’s average includes PassMark DirectX 9/10/11/12 scores ranging from 103 to 320, which are lower-magnitude metrics that drag down its aggregate. The Radeon Pro 575X’s percentile ranking of 82 versus the RTX 4070’s 81 reflects this quirk, though it does not indicate real-world parity.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon Pro 575X wins exclusively in the domain of legacy compute efficiency relative to its thermal envelope. With a TDP of 150 W and an integrated form factor (IGP slot width, no power connectors), it is designed for portable Apple Mac systems where space and power are constrained. Its 4 GB GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 217.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p-class workloads of its era. The GCN 4.0 architecture supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, making it functional for older titles and compute APIs.

The RTX 4070 wins in every performance-critical category that matters for modern gaming, rendering, and AI workloads. Its 12 GB GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, over 2.3× the AMD card’s throughput. The Ada Lovelace architecture includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS features that the Radeon Pro 575X cannot match. The RTX 4070 also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and has a higher pixel rate (158.4 GPixel/s vs 35.07 GPixel/s) and texture rate (455.4 GTexel/s vs 140.3 GTexel/s).

The RTX 4070’s PassMark scores further illustrate its breadth: it posts 26,927 in G3D and 14,720 in GPU Compute, while the Radeon Pro 575X has no comparable PassMark results. The NVIDIA card’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,854 indicates strong modern API performance. For users running DirectX 9/10/11 legacy titles, the RTX 4070 still leads with scores of 320, 139, and 244 respectively, though these are not directly comparable to the AMD card’s absence from those tests.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior GPU for any workload that demands modern graphics features, high resolution, or compute acceleration. Its 12 GB VRAM, 29.15 TFLOPS FP32, and dedicated ray tracing and tensor cores make it suitable for 4K gaming, 3D rendering, and machine learning inference. The RTX 4070’s launch MSRP is 599 USD, which reflects its positioning as a mainstream-to-high-end desktop part. It requires a 550 W power supply and occupies a dual-slot form factor with a 16-pin connector, indicating it is intended for full-size desktop builds.

The AMD Radeon Pro 575X is a niche product for specific Apple Mac systems, where its IGP form factor and 150 W TDP are non-negotiable constraints. Its 4 GB memory and 4.489 TFLOPS are sufficient for basic 3D acceleration and compute tasks in that ecosystem, but it is end-of-life (released March 2019) and cannot run modern ray-traced titles or large AI models. Users should choose the Radeon Pro 575X only if they require a drop-in replacement for a legacy Mac Pro or iMac, where the RTX 4070’s physical dimensions and power requirements are incompatible.

For anyone building or upgrading a desktop PC, the RTX 4070 is the only rational choice from this comparison, despite its lower percentile ranking. The RTX 4070’s nearest rivals—NVIDIA Tesla P4 (0.1% delta), AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (0.4%), AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (1.3%)—are all within 1.3% of its average score, indicating tight competition in its class, but none offer its combination of ray tracing, tensor cores, and 12 GB memory. The Radeon Pro 575X’s nearest rivals are similarly clustered, with AMD Radeon Pro 580X and NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A at 1.1% delta, and AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile at -1.1%, showing that the 575X is competitive only within its low-power mobile segment.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575X has a higher average benchmark score of 39,116 compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070’s 37,648, despite losing both head-to-head tests.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two cards?

A: The RTX 4070 provides 504.2 GB/s bandwidth from 12 GB GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, while the Radeon Pro 575X offers 217.0 GB/s from 4 GB GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the Radeon Pro 575X support ray tracing?

A: No, the Radeon Pro 575X has no ray tracing cores, whereas the RTX 4070 includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores.

Q: What is the process node and transistor density for each?

A: The Radeon Pro 575X uses a 14 nm process (GlobalFoundries) with 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die (24.6M/mm²); the RTX 4070 uses a 5 nm process (TSMC) with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die (121.8M/mm²).

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The RTX 4070 achieves 29.15 TFLOPS FP32, which is 6.5× the Radeon Pro 575X’s 4.489 TFLOPS.

Q: Are both cards still in production?

A: No, both are end-of-life; the Radeon Pro 575X was released in March 2019, and the RTX 4070 in April 2023.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs spans multiple generations. The AMD Radeon Pro 575X is built on GCN 4.0 architecture (chip codename Ellesmere), manufactured on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It packs 5,700 million transistors into a 232 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 24.6M per square millimeter. This design uses 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs, with a 256-bit memory bus connected to 4 GB of GDDR5 memory. Its compute capabilities are limited to FP32 and FP16 at 4.489 TFLOPS each (1:1 ratio), with no dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores. The card runs at a 150 W TDP, fits an IGP slot width, and requires no external power connectors, reflecting its mobile integration in Apple Mac systems. It supports PCIe 3.0 x16 and manages DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture (chip AD104), using TSMC’s 5 nm process. It houses 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, achieving 121.8M transistors per square millimeter—a density nearly five times higher than the AMD part. The GPU features 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, alongside 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores. Its 192-bit memory bus connects to 12 GB of GDDR6X memory with effective speeds of 21 Gbps. The base clock is 1920 MHz with a boost of 2475 MHz, enabling 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16. This card consumes 200 W TDP, requires a 550 W power supply, and uses a single 16-pin connector. It occupies a dual-slot form factor measuring 240 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, with outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. It supports PCIe 4.0 x16 and APIs including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 4070’s predecessor is the GeForce 30 series, and its successor is the GeForce 50 series.