AMD Radeon Pro 570X vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE Comparison

The benchmark data presents a stark generational contrast between two AMD GPUs: the Radeon RX 7900 GRE, a current-generation RDNA 3.0 part, and the Radeon Pro 570X, an end-of-life GCN 4.0 mobile part. The performance chasm is immense, but the data also reveals a nuanced story about benchmark positioning and architectural philosophy.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE has an average benchmark score of 32456, while the AMD Radeon Pro 570X scores 32176. The RX 7900 GRE is 0.9% ahead of the Pro 570X based on the deltaPct in its nearestRivals list.

Q: How do the cards compare in raw compute performance?

A: The RX 7900 GRE delivers 45.98 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Pro 570X provides 3.960 TFLOPS. The RX 7900 GRE also reaches 91.96 TFLOPS in FP16 (2:1), whereas the Pro 570X is capped at 3.960 TFLOPS (1:1).

Q: Which card has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The RX 7900 GRE features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Pro 570X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus with 217.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node and transistor count difference?

A: The RX 7900 GRE is built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. The Pro 570X uses a 14 nm GlobalFoundries process with 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die.

Q: Are there any benchmark tests where the Pro 570X wins?

A: No. In the head-to-head benchmarks, the RX 7900 GRE wins both tests. The Pro 570X has no wins in the headToHeadBenchmarks data.

Q: What API levels do the two cards support?

A: The RX 7900 GRE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Pro 570X supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous for almost any use case: the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE is the superior performer. Its 45.98 TFLOPS FP32 output is over 11 times that of the Pro 570X, and its 16 GB memory buffer dwarfs the 4 GB on the older card. The RX 7900 GRE wins 2 out of 2 head-to-head benchmarks, with a massive 536.7% lead in Geekbench OpenCL and a 246% lead in Geekbench Vulkan.

The Pro 570X, however, has one niche where it is not merely competitive but potentially preferable: its form factor. The Pro 570X is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs, making it suitable for compact, low-power systems. Its 150 W TDP is also significantly lower than the RX 7900 GRE's 260 W. For a user building a small, passively-cooled workstation, the Pro 570X's physical profile is a decisive advantage.

For anyone else — gamers, content creators, or compute users — the RX 7900 GRE is the only rational choice. Its 77th percentile ranking among all GPUs versus the Pro 570X's 76th percentile is deceptive; the raw benchmark scores tell the real story. The RX 7900 GRE is not just better; it is in a different performance class entirely.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a complete sweep for the RX 7900 GRE. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 7900 GRE scores 175758 against the Pro 570X's 27604. This is a 536.7% delta, meaning the newer card is over six times faster in this compute-heavy workload. This result aligns with the raw specification gap: the RX 7900 GRE's 5120 shading units and 320 TMUs utterly overwhelm the Pro 570X's 1792 shading units and 112 TMUs.

The Geekbench Vulkan test tells a similar, though less extreme, story. The RX 7900 GRE scores 99850, while the Pro 570X manages 28859. The 246% delta reflects the RX 7900 GRE's architectural advancements in graphics rendering. The newer card's 80 ray tracing cores, which the Pro 570X lacks entirely, contribute to this lead in modern graphics APIs.

Notably, the Pro 570X has one benchmark result not shared by the RX 7900 GRE: Geekbench Metal, where it scores 40066. This is a macOS-specific test, and its presence in the data suggests the Pro 570X was designed for Apple platforms. The RX 7900 GRE has no Metal benchmark listed, indicating it is not targeted at that ecosystem.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets for these two cards diverge on nearly every major component. The RX 7900 GRE operates at a base clock of 1287 MHz and a boost clock of 2245 MHz, with a game clock of 1880 MHz. The Pro 570X runs at a much lower 1000 MHz base and 1105 MHz boost, with no game clock listed. Memory speeds also differ: the RX 7900 GRE uses 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) GDDR6, while the Pro 570X uses 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective) GDDR5.

The memory configuration is a critical differentiator. The RX 7900 GRE has 16 GB of GDDR6 with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Pro 570X has 4 GB of GDDR5 with 217.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both use a 256-bit bus, but the newer memory technology and higher clock speed give the RX 7900 GRE a 2.65 times bandwidth advantage.

Power and physical specifications are equally divergent. The RX 7900 GRE has a 260 W TDP, requires a 600 W suggested PSU, and uses 2x 8-pin power connectors. It is a dual-slot card measuring 276 mm x 110 mm x 51 mm. The Pro 570X has a 150 W TDP, no power connectors, and is an IGP with no listed dimensions. The RX 7900 GRE uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Pro 570X uses PCIe 3.0 x16.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs spans nearly a decade of AMD design evolution. The RX 7900 GRE is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Plum Bonito, using the Navi 31 chip. It is fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 109.1M / mm². The Pro 570X uses the GCN 4.0 architecture with the Ellesmere chip, built on a 14 nm GlobalFoundries process with 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die, for a density of 24.6M / mm².

The RDNA 3.0 architecture brings with it 80 dedicated ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the GCN 4.0 design. The RX 7900 GRE also has a 2:1 FP16 ratio, allowing it to double its FP32 throughput for half-precision workloads, while the Pro 570X has a 1:1 ratio with no such acceleration. The RX 7900 GRE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading, while the Pro 570X is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0).

The manufacturing process difference is stark: 5 nm versus 14 nm. This explains the RX 7900 GRE's ability to pack over 10 times more transistors into a die that is only 2.3 times larger. The RX 7900 GRE is part of the Navi III (RX 7000) generation, with a predecessor in Navi II and a successor in Navi IV. The Pro 570X belongs to the Radeon Pro Mac (500X Series) generation and has no listed predecessor or successor.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7900 GRE wins in every measurable performance category from the data. In compute, its 45.98 TFLOPS FP32 and 91.96 TFLOPS FP16 are unmatched by the Pro 570X's 3.960 TFLOPS in both. The pixel rate of 359.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 718.4 GTexel/s on the RX 7900 GRE dwarf the Pro 570X's 35.36 GPixel/s and 123.8 GTexel/s. For any workload involving 3D rendering, machine learning inference, or video processing, the RX 7900 GRE is the clear choice.

The Pro 570X wins in the domain of physical integration. Its IGP form factor, absent power connectors, and portable-device-dependent display outputs make it ideal for laptops or all-in-one systems where space and power are constrained. Its 150 W TDP is 110 W lower than the RX 7900 GRE's 260 W, which could be critical for thermal management in thin chassis. The Pro 570X's Metal benchmark score of 40066 also indicates it has a place in macOS environments, while the RX 7900 GRE has no such data.

The RX 7900 GRE is for the desktop enthusiast who demands maximum performance. The Pro 570X is for the OEM integrator building a compact, power-efficient Mac-compatible system. The performance gap is so wide that any user who can accommodate the RX 7900 GRE's dual-slot, 276 mm length and 600 W PSU requirement will see transformative gains. The Pro 570X is not a competitor to the RX 7900 GRE; it is a solution for a different problem entirely.