AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT are two very different GPUs from AMD, separated by a generation of architecture and a shift in purpose. The Pro 5700 is an end-of-life, integrated graphics processor from the RDNA 1.0 era, while the RX 7600 XT is an active, dual-slot add-in card built on RDNA 3.0. The benchmark data shows a clear performance hierarchy, with the newer card winning 8 of 9 head-to-head matchups, but the older card holds a notable advantage in one specific API test.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The RX 7600 XT dominates the overall benchmark suite, but the margin of victory varies significantly by workload. The most dramatic difference is in the Geekbench OpenCL test, where the RX 7600 XT scores 92,426 against the Pro 5700’s 52,787, a 42.9% lead. This is a massive gap that indicates a substantial advantage in general compute and raw throughput. The Passmark GPU Compute test shows a similar story, with the RX 7600 XT scoring 8,987 versus 4,961 for the Pro 5700, a 44.8% difference. These two results highlight that the newer card’s architecture is far more efficient at parallel processing tasks.

The gap narrows somewhat in DirectX gaming workloads, but the RX 7600 XT still comes out ahead. In Passmark DirectX 11, the RX 7600 XT scores 167 compared to the Pro 5700’s 78, a 53.3% lead, which is its largest margin of victory in any test. The DirectX 12 test shows a smaller, but still decisive, advantage: 65 versus 48, a 26.2% difference. The DirectX 10 test sees the RX 7600 XT ahead by 16.5% (85 versus 71), and in DirectX 9, it leads by 37.3% (228 versus 143). The Pro 5700’s best showing in gaming is in the DirectX 12 test, where its 48 points is closer to the RX 7600 XT’s 65 than in any other gaming API.

The one area where the Pro 5700 wins outright is the Geekbench Vulkan test. Here, the older card scores 51,289 against the RX 7600 XT’s 48,366, a 6% lead. This is a curious result, as it suggests the Pro 5700’s Vulkan driver or hardware implementation has an edge in this specific low-level API, despite losing in every other test. The Passmark G2D (2D graphics) test also goes to the RX 7600 XT, with a score of 1,030 versus 805, a 21.8% difference. The overall Passmark G3D score heavily favors the RX 7600 XT, which posts 17,132 versus 11,583 for the Pro 5700, a 32.4% lead. These results paint a clear picture: the RX 7600 XT is the superior performer in almost every measurable category, with the Vulkan test being the sole exception.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two cards is significant. The Pro 5700 is built on the Navi 10 chip using the RDNA 1.0 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip with the RDNA 3.0 architecture, on a more advanced 6 nm process, also from TSMC. This process shrink allows the RX 7600 XT to pack 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 65.2M / mm². The Pro 5700, by contrast, has 10,300 million transistors on a larger 251 mm² die, giving it a lower density of 41.0M / mm².

The RX 7600 XT’s newer architecture also brings major clock speed improvements. It has a base clock of 1980 MHz and a boost clock of 2755 MHz, with a game clock of 2470 MHz. The Pro 5700 is far more conservative, with a base clock of 1243 MHz and a boost clock of 1350 MHz. This clock speed difference is a primary driver of the performance gap. The RX 7600 XT also features 32 ray tracing cores, while the Pro 5700 has none listed. The memory configurations differ as well: the Pro 5700 uses an 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer on a 256-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7600 XT doubles the capacity to 16 GB but uses a narrower 128-bit bus, resulting in lower 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The compute unit configurations are interesting. The Pro 5700 has more shading units (2304 versus 2048) and more texture mapping units (144 versus 128), but both cards have 64 ROPs. However, the RX 7600 XT’s higher clocks and architectural efficiency make its raw throughput figures far higher. The RX 7600 XT achieves 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.57 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), while the Pro 5700 manages 6.221 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.44 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The pixel rate is also much higher on the RX 7600 XT at 176.3 GPixel/s versus 86.40 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 352.6 GTexel/s versus 194.4 GTexel/s.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unequivocal: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the more powerful GPU. It wins 8 of 9 head-to-head tests, with wins in every DirectX version, OpenCL, and compute workload. Its most significant victories are in OpenCL (42.9% ahead) and GPU compute (44.8% ahead), which points to a major advantage in non-gaming, compute-heavy tasks. In gaming, the DirectX 11 lead of 53.3% is the largest, but the DirectX 12 advantage of 26.2% is also substantial. The RX 7600 XT’s 16 GB of memory is double the Pro 5700’s 8 GB, which is a significant advantage for modern games and larger textures. Its higher average benchmark score of 17,083 versus the Pro 5700’s 18,189 is misleading because the Pro 5700’s average is skewed by its winning Vulkan score and different test suite composition. The RX 7600 XT’s percentile ranking of 60 versus the Pro 5700’s 62 is also close, but the head-to-head results show a clear winner.

The only reason to pick the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 would be if your primary workload is Vulkan-based, where it holds a 6% lead. However, this single win does not offset the RX 7600 XT’s dominance in every other category. The Pro 5700 is also end-of-life, meaning no further driver optimizations are likely, while the RX 7600 XT is an active product. For any gamer or general-purpose user, the RX 7600 XT is the obvious choice based on performance data. Its higher power draw of 190 W versus 130 W is a trade-off, but the performance gains are substantial. The Pro 5700’s integrated design with no display outputs makes it a niche product for specific embedded or Mac systems, not a general-purpose graphics card.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every key specification. The Pro 5700 is based on RDNA 1.0 with a 7 nm process, while the RX 7600 XT uses RDNA 3.0 on a 6 nm process. The Pro 5700 has a lower base clock of 1243 MHz and boost clock of 1350 MHz, while the RX 7600 XT has a base clock of 1980 MHz and boost clock of 2755 MHz. Memory capacity is 8 GB versus 16 GB, and the bus width is 256-bit versus 128-bit. Bandwidth is 384.0 GB/s for the Pro 5700 and 288.0 GB/s for the RX 7600 XT. The Pro 5700 has 2304 shading units and 144 TMUs, while the RX 7600 XT has 2048 shading units and 128 TMUs. Both have 64 ROPs, but the RX 7600 XT adds 32 ray tracing cores, which the Pro 5700 lacks. The RX 7600 XT has a higher TDP of 190 W versus 130 W, and it requires a 450 W PSU versus 300 W. The Pro 5700 is an IGP with no power connectors and no display outputs, while the RX 7600 XT is a dual-slot card with a single 8-pin connector and outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The RX 7600 XT also has a larger physical footprint at 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is significantly ahead, offering 22.57 TFLOPS compared to the AMD Radeon Pro 5700’s 6.221 TFLOPS.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 has higher bandwidth at 384.0 GB/s, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has 288.0 GB/s, despite having double the memory capacity.

Q: Which card has ray tracing support?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT includes 32 ray tracing cores, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 has no ray tracing cores listed.

Q: What is the DirectX feature level of each card?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: Are both cards currently in production?

A: No, the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 is end-of-life, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has an active production status.

Q: What is the Vulkan performance difference?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 wins the Geekbench Vulkan test with a score of 51,289, which is 6% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT’s score of 48,366.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the clear winner in the vast majority of scenarios. It excels in compute-heavy workloads, as shown by its 44.8% lead in Passmark GPU Compute and 42.9% lead in Geekbench OpenCL. For gaming, it is the superior choice across all DirectX versions, with its largest margin in DirectX 11 (53.3%) and a solid 26.2% lead in DirectX 12. Its 16 GB of memory makes it better suited for modern games with high-resolution textures or for users who run multiple applications simultaneously. The card’s higher pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s also give it an edge in high-resolution rendering and texture-heavy scenes. It is also the only one of the two with display outputs, making it a practical choice for a standard desktop PC.

The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 has a very narrow set of advantages. Its only benchmark win is in Geekbench Vulkan, where it leads by 6%. This makes it a potential choice for developers or users working specifically with Vulkan-based applications that are optimized for its architecture. It also has a higher memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s, which could theoretically benefit certain memory-intensive workloads, though this does not translate to a win in any benchmark test. Its integrated nature and lack of display outputs suggest it was designed for specific OEM or Mac systems, not for user-upgradeable desktop use. For anyone building a new system or upgrading an existing one, the RX 7600 XT is the data-backed recommendation.