AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Comparison

# NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER and AMD Radeon Pro 460 occupy vastly different tiers of the GPU landscape, and the benchmark data reflects an enormous performance gulf. The RTX 2060 SUPER, a Turing-architecture desktop part from 2019, delivers average benchmark scores of 18,093 and sits in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs, while the Radeon Pro 460, a GCN 4.0 mobile-class part from 2016, averages 17,509 and ranks in the 61st percentile. Despite the close percentile positions, the head-to-head results show the RTX 2060 SUPER outperforming the Radeon Pro 460 by 403.5% in Geekbench OpenCL and 360.3% in Geekbench Vulkan. These are not competing products in any practical sense, but the data provides a clear case study in architectural generational leaps and workload-specific strengths.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 2060 SUPER wins every benchmark where both products have data. In the two shared tests — Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan — the NVIDIA card leads decisively, with scores of 76,957 and 77,402 respectively, versus the AMD card's 15,284 and 16,816. The delta percentages of 403.5% and 360.3% indicate that the RTX 2060 SUPER is not merely faster but operates in a completely different performance class. There are no benchmark categories where the Radeon Pro 460 comes out ahead.

However, the Radeon Pro 460 does have one exclusive benchmark result: Geekbench Metal, where it scores 20,426. This test is not available for the RTX 2060 SUPER, so it cannot be compared directly. The Radeon Pro 460 also benefits from its form factor and power envelope — it is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a 35 W TDP and no power connectors, making it suitable for portable devices where the RTX 2060 SUPER, a dual-slot 175 W card requiring a 1x 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU, would be impractical. The RTX 2060 SUPER's wins are universal in raw compute, but the Radeon Pro 460 wins on integration flexibility.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are separated by two generations of design philosophy. The RTX 2060 SUPER uses the TU106 chip built on TSMC's 12 nm process, packing 10,800 million transistors into a 445 mm² die with a transistor density of 24.3M per mm². The Radeon Pro 460 uses the Baffin chip on GlobalFoundries' 14 nm process, with 3,000 million transistors on a 123 mm² die at a density of 24.4M per mm² — nearly identical density, but the NVIDIA chip is 3.6 times larger in transistor count and die area.

The RTX 2060 SUPER features 2,176 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, 34 ray tracing cores, and 272 tensor cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Radeon Pro 460 has 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with no ray tracing or tensor cores. It supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The architectural gap is stark: the RTX 2060 SUPER has hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration, while the Radeon Pro 460 relies on GCN 4.0's simpler compute-focused design.

Memory subsystems differ substantially. The RTX 2060 SUPER has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 460 has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus, providing 81.28 GB/s — roughly one-fifth the bandwidth. Clock speeds also favor the NVIDIA card: 1470 MHz base and 1650 MHz boost versus 850 MHz base and 907 MHz boost. The Radeon Pro 460's FP16 performance matches its FP32 at 1.858 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while the RTX 2060 SUPER doubles its FP32 rate to 14.36 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio), indicating better mixed-precision throughput.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Geekbench OpenCL test shows the most extreme disparity. The RTX 2060 SUPER scores 76,957, while the Radeon Pro 460 manages only 15,284 — a 403.5% advantage for NVIDIA. This is not a marginal win but a five-fold performance gap. The OpenCL workload stresses raw compute throughput, where the RTX 2060 SUPER's 7.181 TFLOPS FP32 and 272 tensor cores overwhelm the Radeon Pro 460's 1.858 TFLOPS and lack of dedicated AI hardware.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the margin narrows slightly but remains overwhelming. The RTX 2060 SUPER scores 77,402 versus 16,816, a 360.3% lead. Vulkan's lower-level API overhead benefits both architectures, but the RTX 2060 SUPER's superior pixel rate (105.6 GPixel/s versus 14.51 GPixel/s) and texture rate (224.4 GTexel/s versus 58.05 GTexel/s) ensure it maintains a massive advantage in graphics-bound tasks.

The Radeon Pro 460's only high point is its Geekbench Metal score of 20,426, which is not directly comparable to any RTX 2060 SUPER result. Metal is Apple's proprietary API, and the Radeon Pro 460's positioning in the Radeon Pro Mac (400 Series) generation suggests it targets macOS environments where Metal is the primary interface. The RTX 2060 SUPER has no Metal benchmark data, so this remains a distinct data point for the AMD card.

For context, the RTX 2060 SUPER's nearest rivals by average score include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile at 18,159 (delta -0.4%), the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 at 18,189 (delta -0.5%), and the AMD Radeon RX 460 at 18,373 (delta -1.5%). The Radeon Pro 460's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla K40c at 17,468 (delta 0.2%), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 at 17,551 (delta -0.2%), and the AMD Radeon 780M at 17,588 (delta -0.5%). This places both cards in similar percentile territory despite the massive head-to-head delta, indicating that the Radeon Pro 460's benchmark set is more limited and its scoring context different.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER delivers 7.181 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Radeon Pro 460 delivers 1.858 TFLOPS FP32. In shared benchmarks, the RTX 2060 SUPER leads by 403.5% in Geekbench OpenCL and 360.3% in Geekbench Vulkan.

Q: Does the Radeon Pro 460 support ray tracing?

A: No. The Radeon Pro 460 has no ray tracing cores (rtCores: null) and no tensor cores. The RTX 2060 SUPER includes 34 ray tracing cores and 272 tensor cores.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has 448.0 GB/s bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus. The Radeon Pro 460 has 81.28 GB/s from 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus — a 5.5-fold difference.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has a 175 W TDP and requires a 450 W suggested PSU with a 1x 8-pin connector. The Radeon Pro 460 has a 35 W TDP, no power connectors, and is classified as an IGP.

Q: Which GPU is better for portable devices?

A: The Radeon Pro 460 is designed for portability with its IGP form factor, 35 W TDP, and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The RTX 2060 SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 229 mm in length.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The RTX 2060 SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Radeon Pro 460 supports DirectX 12 (12_0). Both support OpenGL 4.6, but the RTX 2060 SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4 versus Vulkan 1.3 on the Radeon Pro 460.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro 460 in every directly comparable benchmark by margins exceeding 360%. The RTX 2060 SUPER offers 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, 2,176 shading units, hardware ray tracing, and tensor cores, all within a 175 W envelope. The Radeon Pro 460, with its 4 GB GDDR5, 1,024 shading units, and 35 W TDP, is a fundamentally different product aimed at low-power integrated applications.

Buyers should choose the RTX 2060 SUPER for any workload requiring high compute throughput, modern API support, or ray tracing capability. It ranks in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs and its average benchmark score of 18,093 places it near the RTX 3060 Mobile and Radeon Pro 5700. The Radeon Pro 460, ranking in the 61st percentile with an average of 17,509, remains relevant only in scenarios where its IGP form factor and 35 W power draw are mandatory — for example, in portable Mac systems (Radeon Pro Mac 400 Series) where the RTX 2060 SUPER's dual-slot size and power requirements are simply not an option. For any user comparing these two directly, the RTX 2060 SUPER is the only rational choice on performance; the Radeon Pro 460's sole advantage is its integration flexibility, not its benchmark results.