AMD Radeon HD 8750M vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Comparison

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and AMD Radeon HD 8750M are two end-of-life mobile graphics solutions from different architectural generations. The data shows a clear split: AMD’s discrete part wins the single available head-to-head benchmark, while Intel’s integrated GPU counters with a broader feature set and higher theoretical throughput in several key metrics. Neither part is dominant across the board, and their respective strengths point to different use cases.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results indicate that the AMD Radeon HD 8750M is the outright winner in compute workloads, at least as measured by Geekbench OpenCL. In that test, the AMD part scores 5970 against Intel’s 4556, a margin of 23.7% in AMD’s favor. This is the only direct head-to-head comparison available in the data, and it gives AMD a 1–0 win tally. For users whose primary workload is OpenCL-accelerated compute—such as video encoding, physics simulation, or general GPU compute—the Radeon HD 8750M is the stronger choice.

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200, however, wins in several architectural and theoretical categories. It has a higher FP32 throughput of 844.8 GFLOPS versus AMD’s 633.6 GFLOPS, a 33% advantage in raw shader math. Its texture rate of 52.80 GTexel/s is more than 2.6 times AMD’s 19.80 GTexel/s, indicating superior fill-rate capability in texture-heavy scenes. Both parts have identical pixel rates at 6.600 GPixel/s, so neither wins there. Intel also offers a more complete API stack for newer software: Vulkan 1.0 support versus AMD’s Vulkan 1.2.170 (though the latter is a higher version number), and OpenGL 4.4 versus AMD’s 4.6. The Intel part’s DirectX support matches AMD at 12 (11_1).

Where the AMD wins decisively is in memory bandwidth. The Radeon HD 8750M has a dedicated 128-bit bus with 28.80 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel’s memory is system-shared and bandwidth is listed as “System Dependent.” For workloads that are bandwidth-bound, such as large texture streaming or certain compute kernels, the AMD part’s fixed memory pipeline is a practical advantage.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different foundries and process nodes. Intel’s Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on a 14 nm process by Intel, using the Broadwell GT3e chip with Generation 8.0 architecture. AMD’s Radeon HD 8750M uses a 28 nm process from TSMC, with the Mars chip and GCN 1.0 architecture. The process gap is significant: Intel’s 14 nm node is two generations ahead of AMD’s 28 nm, which likely contributes to Intel’s ability to integrate the GPU on a low 15 W TDP. AMD’s TDP is not listed, but its discrete nature and older process suggest higher power draw.

Shader configurations differ notably. Both have 384 shading units, but Intel packs 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) versus AMD’s 24. AMD counters with 8 ROPs against Intel’s 6. This explains the texture rate disparity—Intel has double the TMUs—and the equal pixel rate despite AMD’s extra ROPs, as pixel rate is also affected by clock speeds. Intel’s base clock is 300 MHz with a boost of 1100 MHz, while AMD runs at a base of 775 MHz and boost of 825 MHz. Intel’s boost clock is 33% higher than AMD’s, which helps its FP32 and texture throughput despite starting from a lower base.

Memory is a fundamental split. Intel uses system-shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, while AMD has 1024 MB of DDR3 on a 128-bit bus. AMD’s memory clock is 900 MHz (1800 Mbps effective), yielding 28.80 GB/s. Intel’s memory bandwidth is “System Dependent,” meaning it varies with the host system’s RAM. For gaming or compute where consistent memory performance matters, AMD’s dedicated pool is more predictable.

Transistor count and die size also differ. AMD lists 950 million transistors on a 77 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 12.3M / mm². Intel’s transistor count and die size are not provided. The bus interface differs: Intel uses a Ring Bus (typical for integrated parts), while AMD uses PCIe 3.0 x8, confirming its discrete nature.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single direct comparison in the data is Geekbench OpenCL, where the AMD Radeon HD 8750M scores 5970 versus Intel’s 4556. The deltaPct is -23.7% from Intel’s perspective, meaning AMD is 23.7% faster. This is a substantial margin and suggests that AMD’s GCN architecture is more efficient at OpenCL compute tasks than Intel’s integrated solution, despite Intel’s higher theoretical FP32 rate. The gap likely stems from AMD’s dedicated memory and higher base clock (775 MHz) compared to Intel’s base (300 MHz), even though Intel’s boost reaches higher.

In the broader benchmark context, Intel’s average score across all its tests (Geekbench Metal, OpenCL, and Vulkan) is 6117, while AMD’s average is 5970 (based on only one test). Intel’s percentileVsAllGpus is 35, slightly above AMD’s 34. Intel also has additional benchmark results—Geekbench Metal at 7764 and Geekbench Vulkan at 6032—which AMD lacks. These extra scores pull Intel’s average up, but they also show that Intel performs well in Metal and Vulkan, suggesting better modern API support despite its lower OpenCL showing.

Nearest rival data contextualizes both parts. Intel’s closest rival is AMD Radeon HD 8690M with an average score of 6137, only 0.3% ahead. The NVIDIA RTX A400 (6078) and GeForce MX230 (6077) are also within 0.7%. This indicates Intel’s integrated GPU competes with low-end discrete parts. AMD’s nearest rival is NVIDIA Quadro K4000 (5982), which is 0.2% faster, and Quadro K620M (5957), which is 0.2% slower. AMD’s performance is tightly clustered around 5970–5986, showing it sits at a specific performance tier.

The Verdict

From the data, the AMD Radeon HD 8750M is the pick for OpenCL-heavy compute workloads. Its 23.7% lead in the only head-to-head test is decisive. The dedicated 128-bit memory bus with 28.80 GB/s bandwidth provides consistent memory performance that Intel’s system-shared design cannot guarantee. For users running compute kernels, physics, or any workload that scales with memory bandwidth, AMD is the safer choice.

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the pick for general-purpose use where the host system’s memory is fast and where newer API support matters. Its higher FP32 throughput (844.8 GFLOPS vs 633.6 GFLOPS), double the texture rate (52.80 vs 19.80 GTexel/s), and equal pixel rate (6.600 GPixel/s both) mean it can handle texture-heavy rendering tasks well when memory bandwidth is sufficient. Its 15 W TDP makes it suitable for thin-and-light systems, while AMD’s TDP is unknown but likely higher. Intel also has Vulkan 1.0 and OpenGL 4.4 support, plus additional benchmark results in Metal and Vulkan that show respectable scores (7764 and 6032, respectively).

There is no universal winner. AMD wins the compute test; Intel wins on paper in shader throughput and texture fill. The choice depends on whether you prioritize raw OpenCL performance (AMD) or integrated efficiency with broader API support (Intel). Both are end-of-life, so neither is a forward-looking investment.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The AMD Radeon HD 8750M scores 5970 against Intel’s 4556, a 23.7% advantage for AMD.

Q: Does Intel have any benchmark advantage?

A: Yes. Intel has additional Geekbench scores: 7764 in Metal and 6032 in Vulkan, which AMD does not have. Intel’s average benchmark score across all tests is 6117, higher than AMD’s 5970.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: AMD has 1024 MB of dedicated DDR3 on a 128-bit bus with 28.80 GB/s bandwidth. Intel uses system-shared memory with bandwidth listed as “System Dependent.”

Q: How do their shading units compare?

A: Both have 384 shading units, but Intel has 48 TMUs versus AMD’s 24, and AMD has 8 ROPs versus Intel’s 6.

Q: Which part has a higher boost clock?

A: Intel boosts to 1100 MHz, while AMD boosts to 825 MHz. Intel’s base clock is 300 MHz, lower than AMD’s 775 MHz.

Q: What are their process nodes?

A: Intel uses a 14 nm process from Intel, while AMD uses a 28 nm process from TSMC. AMD’s transistor count is 950 million on a 77 mm² die.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | AMD Radeon HD 8750M |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 1.0 |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not listed | 950 million |

| Die Size | Not listed | 77 mm² |

| Transistor Density | Not listed | 12.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 775 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 825 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 1024 MB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | DDR3 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 28.80 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |

| TMUs | 48 | 24 |

| ROPs | 6 | 8 |

| Pixel Rate | 6.600 GPixel/s | 6.600 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 19.80 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 844.8 GFLOPS | 633.6 GFLOPS |

| TDP | 15 W | Not listed |

| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 |

| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.2.170 |

| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |

| Release Date | 2014-09-04 | 2013-02-25 |

| Predecessor | Not listed | London |

| Successor | Not listed | Gem System |