AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Intel Arc A380E Comparison

# AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Intel Arc A380E

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 and Intel Arc A380E occupy entirely different performance classes, with the AMD part delivering roughly 11.7 times the FP32 compute throughput of the Intel part (47.84 TFLOPS versus 4.096 TFLOPS). The recorded data shows the R9700 as an active, high-end workstation accelerator with a 69th percentile standing among all GPUs, while the A380E is an end-of-life entry-level embedded part at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The R9700 carries a 300 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, and 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, whereas the A380E uses 75 W, a single-slot design, and 6 GB of GDDR6.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 wins in every measurable performance category where data exists. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7006 establishes a strong modern DirectX 12 baseline, and its Geekbench OpenCL result of 118202 points to substantial compute throughput for GPU-accelerated workloads. The Vulkan score of 63550 reinforces this pattern, showing consistent cross-API capability. In Passmark tests, the R9700 records 26979 in G3D and 15300 in GPU compute, both indicating a high-end part. Its 47.84 TFLOPS FP32 rate and 644.6 GB/s memory bandwidth place it in a different tier from the A380E, which offers 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 186.0 GB/s.

The Intel Arc A380E has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its wins are limited to structural and efficiency attributes. It consumes 75 W versus 300 W, requires no power connectors, and fits in a single slot with a 20 mm width. Its suggested power supply is 250 W compared to 700 W for the R9700. The A380E also supports four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, while the R9700 provides one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a connectors. For deployment scenarios prioritizing low power draw, compact physical footprint, and multi-display output, the A380E holds an advantage, but in raw performance the R9700 dominates every recorded metric.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use fundamentally different architectures manufactured on different process nodes. AMD builds the R9700 on Navi 48 silicon using RDNA 4.0 architecture at TSMC's 4 nm node, containing 53,900 million transistors across a 357 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 151.0 million per mm². Intel builds the A380E on DG2-128 silicon using Xe-HPG architecture at TSMC's 6 nm node, containing 7,200 million transistors across a 157 mm² die, yielding 45.9 million per mm². The R9700 belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, while the A380E belongs to the Alchemist (Arc 3) generation.

The compute resources differ dramatically. The R9700 has 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, 128 raster operation units, and 64 ray tracing cores. The A380E has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. Both parts lack dedicated tensor cores. The R9700 achieves a pixel rate of 373.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 747.5 GTexel/s, while the A380E reaches 64.00 GPixel/s and 128.0 GTexel/s. FP16 performance differs in ratio: the R9700 delivers 47.84 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, while the A380E delivers 8.192 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, indicating the Intel part doubles its FP16 throughput relative to FP32.

Memory architecture also diverges sharply. The R9700 uses a 256-bit memory bus with 32 GB of GDDR6 at 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective), producing 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The A380E uses a 96-bit bus with 6 GB of GDDR6 at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective), producing 186.0 GB/s. Clock behavior differs as well: the R9700 runs a 1660 MHz base clock, 2350 MHz game clock, and 2920 MHz boost clock, while the A380E holds a fixed 2000 MHz for both base and boost. The R9700 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, and the A380E uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No direct head-to-head benchmark entries exist in the database for these two GPUs, so comparisons rely on the R9700's recorded scores and the A380E's absence of scores. The R9700's average benchmark score of 23315 places it just 0.2% above the AMD Radeon R9 M290X and AMD Radeon RX 6600M, and 0.3% above the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA P106-100. These nearest rivals all cluster near 23250 to 23276 average scores, indicating the R9700 sits in a tightly grouped performance band despite its high absolute specifications.

The A380E has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, meaning no comparable performance data is available. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median of all GPUs, while the R9700 ranks at the 69th percentile. The absence of A380E scores prevents a direct numerical delta calculation between the two parts. What the data does show is that the R9700's individual benchmark results are substantial: 7006 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 118202 in Geekbench OpenCL, 63550 in Geekbench Vulkan, 26979 in Passmark G3D, and 15300 in Passmark GPU compute. The A380E offers no counterpoints in any of these tests.

The R9700's Passmark legacy DirectX scores are modest relative to its modern results: 155 in DirectX 10, 272 in DirectX 11, 83 in DirectX 12, and 363 in DirectX 9, with a 2D score of 1236. These numbers suggest the R9700 prioritizes current-generation APIs and compute workloads over legacy rasterization paths. The A380E's fixed 2000 MHz clock and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 rate indicate a deliberately power-limited design, but without benchmark data its real-world standing cannot be quantified against the R9700.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 delivers 47.84 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc A380E delivers 4.096 TFLOPS FP32, a ratio of roughly 11.7 to 1 in favor of the AMD part.

Q: How much memory does each card have and what is the bandwidth?

A: The R9700 has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The A380E has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The R9700 has a 300 W TDP, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and requires a 700 W suggested power supply. The A380E has a 75 W TDP, uses no power connectors, and requires a 250 W suggested power supply.

Q: Are both GPUs still in production?

A: No. The R9700 has an Active production status and released on 2025-07-22, while the A380E is End-of-life, released on 2024-03-31, with Battlemage listed as its successor.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The R9700's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, and the A380E's predecessor is Xe Graphics.

Q: What display outputs does each card provide?

A: The R9700 provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a. The A380E provides 4x DisplayPort 2.0.

Q: How do their physical dimensions compare?

A: The R9700 measures 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, with a dual-slot cooler. The A380E measures 254 mm in length, 127 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, with a single-slot cooler.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split: the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the superior performer by every recorded benchmark and specification metric, while the Intel Arc A380E wins on power efficiency, physical size, and connector simplicity. The R9700's 47.84 TFLOPS FP32, 644.6 GB/s bandwidth, 32 GB memory capacity, and 69th percentile ranking make it suitable for compute-heavy and high-resolution workloads. Its 300 W TDP and 700 W suggested power supply indicate a workstation-class part requiring substantial system power delivery.

The A380E, with its 75 W TDP, no power connectors, 250 W suggested power supply, single-slot 20 mm width, and four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, targets embedded or multi-display environments where low power draw and minimal chassis footprint take priority over raw throughput. Its 6 GB memory and 96-bit bus limit its capacity for large datasets, but its 2:1 FP16 ratio (8.192 TFLOPS) offers twice the FP16 rate relative to its FP32, which could benefit certain mixed-precision workloads.

Users with compute-intensive tasks should select the R9700 based on its dominant specifications and recorded scores. Users constrained by power budgets, physical space, or multi-display requirements should select the A380E based on its structural advantages. The R9700's launch MSRP is 1,299 USD. No benchmark data exists for the A380E, so its performance cannot be verified beyond its specifications, and its end-of-life status suggests limited long-term support compared to the actively produced R9700.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Intel Arc A380E |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Xe-HPG |

| Generation | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series) | Alchemist (Arc 3) |

| Chip | Navi 48 | DG2-128 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 53,900 million | 7,200 million |

| Die Size | 357 mm² | 157 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 151.0M / mm² | 45.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1660 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2350 MHz | Null |

| Memory Clock | 2518 MHz 20.1 Gbps effective | 1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 32 GB | 6 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 96 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 644.6 GB/s | 186.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 4096 | 1024 |

| TMUs | 256 | 64 |

| ROPs | 128 | 32 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 64 | 8 |

| Pixel Rate | 373.8 GPixel/s | 64.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 747.5 GTexel/s | 128.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 47.84 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 47.84 TFLOPS (1:1) | 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 300 W | 75 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 700 W | 250 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a | 4x DisplayPort 2.0 |

| Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | 254 mm 10 inches |

| Height | 111 mm 4.4 inches | 127 mm 5 inches |

| Width | 40 mm 1.6 inches | 20 mm 0.8 inches |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-07-22 | 2024-03-31 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | Xe Graphics |

| Successor | Null | Battlemage |

| Launch MSRP | 1,299 USD | Null |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 69 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 23315 | 0 |