AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700

CORE STATE Navi 48
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2920 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 4.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
AMD
RADEON

Radeon RX 7700 XT

CORE STATE Navi 32
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2544 MHz
TDP 245 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
7,006
3,316
geekbench_opencl
118,202
138,383
geekbench_vulkan
63,550
46,443
passmark_directx_10
155
119
passmark_directx_11
272
232
passmark_directx_12
83
79
passmark_directx_9
363
294
passmark_g2d
1,236
1,161
passmark_g3d
26,979
22,547
passmark_gpu_compute
15,300
12,912

Analysis: AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT represent two distinct philosophies from the same manufacturer. The AI PRO R9700, built on the newer RDNA 4.0 architecture, is a workstation-focused powerhouse, while the RX 7700 XT is a consumer-oriented part based on RDNA 3.0. Benchmark data reveals a stark contrast in their performance profiles, with the AI PRO R9700 dominating in nine of the ten head-to-head tests, yet suffering a significant defeat in one critical compute workload. This analysis breaks down the data to determine which card excels where and for whom.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic disparity between the two cards appears in the 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 test. Here, the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 scores 7006, which is a massive 111.3% higher than the RX 7700 XT’s score of 3316. This indicates that the AI PRO R9700 is more than twice as fast in this demanding DirectX 12 workload, showcasing a substantial generational leap in raw rendering capability.

The AI PRO R9700 also demonstrates a clear lead in several other key areas. In geekbench_vulkan, it achieves a score of 63550, outperforming the RX 7700 XT’s 46443 by 36.8%. This suggests superior Vulkan API performance, which is crucial for modern games and compute applications. The trend continues in passmark_g3d, where the AI PRO R9700 scores 26979, a 19.7% advantage over the RX 7700 XT’s 22547. This is a broad indicator of overall 3D graphics performance and confirms the AI PRO R9700’s dominance in general rendering tasks.

Further cementing its lead, the AI PRO R9700 wins in legacy DirectX benchmarks. It scores 155 in passmark_directx_10, which is 30.3% higher than the RX 7700 XT’s 119. In passmark_directx_9, the AI PRO R9700’s score of 363 eclipses the RX 7700 XT’s 294 by 23.5%. Even in passmark_directx_11, the AI PRO R9700’s 272 beats the RX 7700 XT’s 232 by 17.2%. The margin narrows in passmark_directx_12, where the AI PRO R9700’s 83 is only 5.1% ahead of the RX 7700 XT’s 79, but it still takes the win.

The AI PRO R9700 also wins the compute-oriented tests, though with varying margins. In passmark_gpu_compute, it scores 15300, an 18.5% improvement over the RX 7700 XT’s 12912. It also edges out the RX 7700 XT in passmark_g2d, a 2D graphics test, with a score of 1236 versus 1161, a 6.5% difference.

However, the RX 7700 XT has one decisive victory. In the geekbench_opencl test, it scores a remarkable 138383, which is 14.6% higher than the AI PRO R9700’s 118202. This is a significant reversal and points to a specific strength in OpenCL workloads where the RX 7700 XT unexpectedly outperforms its more expensive counterpart. This single win prevents a clean sweep and highlights a critical difference in their compute capabilities.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results paint a clear picture of which card is suited for which task. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the clear winner for any workload that depends on DirectX, Vulkan, and general 3D rendering. Its massive 111.3% lead in the Steel Nomad DX12 test and its 36.8% advantage in Vulkan show that it is the superior choice for high-end gaming, 3D modeling, and GPU-accelerated rendering in modern APIs. Its wins in the Passmark G3D and compute tests further solidify its position as the more powerful GPU for professional graphics tasks.

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, despite its loss in most tests, demonstrates a distinct advantage in OpenCL compute. Its 14.6% lead in geekbench_opencl suggests that for applications specifically optimized for OpenCL, such as certain scientific simulations, video encoding, or data processing tools, the RX 7700 XT could offer better performance. This is a niche but important area, and it shows that raw architectural power in one API does not always translate to dominance in another.

In terms of relative standing, the data shows the AI PRO R9700 sits in the 69th percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 7700 XT is in the 67th. The AI PRO R9700’s average benchmark score is 23315, which is 3.4% higher than the RX 7700 XT’s 22549. The nearest rivals for the AI PRO R9700 are cards like the AMD Radeon R9 M290X and the AMD Radeon RX 6600M, which are within 0.3% of its average score. For the RX 7700 XT, its closest competitors are NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and RTX 5060 Mobile, showing it is competitive with those mobile parts.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on different generations of AMD’s GPU architecture. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses the RDNA 4.0 architecture and is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT uses the older RDNA 3.0 architecture and is built on a larger 5 nm process, also at TSMC. This process advantage allows the AI PRO R9700 to pack significantly more transistors into a similar die size. The AI PRO R9700 has 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, while the RX 7700 XT has 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die.

This transistor density difference translates into a substantial spec advantage for the AI PRO R9700. It features 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 128 ROPs. The RX 7700 XT, by comparison, has 3456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The AI PRO R9700 also has more ray tracing cores, with 64 versus the RX 7700 XT’s 54. This hardware advantage is reflected in the AI PRO R9700’s higher compute throughput, with 47.84 TFLOPS of FP32 performance compared to the RX 7700 XT’s 35.17 TFLOPS.

Memory is another major differentiator. The AI PRO R9700 is equipped with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. The RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has only 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AI PRO R9700’s memory operates at 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective), while the RX 7700 XT’s runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This massive difference in memory capacity and bandwidth makes the AI PRO R9700 far better suited for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and AI workloads. Furthermore, the AI PRO R9700 supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RX 7700 XT uses the older PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The Verdict

The data is unequivocal: the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the superior product for nearly all performance metrics. It wins 9 out of 10 head-to-head benchmarks, often by substantial margins. Its 111.3% lead in the 3DMark Steel Nomad test and its 36.8% lead in Vulkan make it the clear choice for any user prioritizing modern DirectX 12 and Vulkan gaming or rendering workloads. The AI PRO R9700’s massive 32 GB memory pool and higher bandwidth also make it the obvious pick for professional content creation, large-scale 3D rendering, and data science tasks where memory capacity is paramount.

Users should choose the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT only if their specific application suite is heavily dependent on OpenCL performance. Its 14.6% victory in the geekbench_opencl test is a standout result and suggests that for certain compute tasks, it can outpace the newer card. However, this is a narrow advantage in a single benchmark. For a general-purpose GPU that excels in gaming and most professional workloads, the RX 7700 XT falls short of the AI PRO R9700 in nearly every category. The choice is simple: for performance, the AI PRO R9700 is the definitive winner; for a niche OpenCL workload, the RX 7700 XT holds a specific edge.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in DirectX 12 gaming?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 is significantly faster. It scores 7006 in the 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 benchmark, which is 111.3% higher than the RX 7700 XT’s score of 3316.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the RX 7700 XT wins?

A: Yes, the RX 7700 XT wins in the geekbench_opencl test, scoring 138383 compared to the AI PRO R9700’s 118202, a 14.6% advantage for the RX 7700 XT.

Q: How much more memory does the AI PRO R9700 have?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. This is a 20 GB difference.

Q: What are the architectural differences between the two cards?

A: The AI PRO R9700 uses the newer RDNA 4.0 architecture on a 4 nm process, while the RX 7700 XT uses RDNA 3.0 on a 5 nm process. The AI PRO R9700 also has more shading units (4096 vs 3456) and ray tracing cores (64 vs 54).

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute power?

A: The AI PRO R9700 has significantly higher FP32 performance at 47.84 TFLOPS, compared to the RX 7700 XT’s 35.17 TFLOPS.

Q: What is the bandwidth difference between the two cards?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 has a memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s, which is substantially higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT’s 432.0 GB/s.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI PRO R9700
RX 7700 XT
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,096
3,456 -15.6%
Shaders
4,096
3,456 -15.6%
TMUs
256
216 -15.6%
ROPs
128
96 -25.0%
Compute Units
64
54 -15.6%
Clocks
Base Clock
1660 MHz
1435 MHz
Boost Clock
2920 MHz
2544 MHz
Game Clock
2350 MHz
2171 MHz
Shader Clock
—
2171 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz 20.1 Gbps effective
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
32 GB
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
32,768
12,288 -62.5%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
644.6 GB/s
432.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
—
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
8 MB
2 MB
L3 Cache
64 MB
48 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
373.8 GPixel/s
244.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
747.5 GTexel/s
549.5 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
47.84 TFLOPS
35.17 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,495.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
1,099.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
47.84 TFLOPS (1:1)
35.17 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
64
54 -15.6%
Matrix Cores
128
108 -15.6%
Power
TDP
300 W
245 W
TDP (W)
300
245 -18.3%
Suggested PSU
700 W
550 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
RDNA 3.0
GPU Name
Navi 48
Navi 32
Codename
—
Wheat Nas
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series)
Navi III (RX 7000)
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
53,900 million
28,100 million
Die Size
357 mm²
346 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
151.0M / mm²
81.2M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
2.2
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
111 mm 4.4 inches
135 mm 5.3 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x HDMI 2.1a2x DisplayPort 2.11x USB Type-C
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
1,299 USD
449 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
Navi II
Successor
—
Navi IV
View Radeon AI PRO R9700 Details View Radeon RX 7700 XT Details