AMD Instinct MI300 vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 Comparison
AMD Instinct MI300
Radeon RX 9060
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Instinct MI300 vs AMD Radeon RX 9060
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Instinct MI300 and the AMD Radeon RX 9060. The Instinct MI300 has no recorded benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals listed. The Radeon RX 9060, by contrast, has ten recorded benchmark results across multiple test suites, an average benchmark score of 16,014, and a percentile ranking of 59 among all GPUs.
The absence of measured data for the MI300 is itself informative. The Instinct MI300 carries an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50, which places it in the middle of the database distribution by default rather than by demonstrated performance. The RX 9060, with its recorded scores, achieves a percentile ranking of 59, meaning it outperforms roughly 59 percent of all GPUs in the database based on actual measurements.
Looking at the RX 9060's individual results, its strongest showing comes in Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 88,183. Its Vulkan result is 39,476, which is less than half of the OpenCL figure, indicating the architecture responds differently to those two compute interfaces. In Passmark tests, the RX 9060 scores 17,631 in G3D, 9,919 in GPU compute, 1,002 in G2D, 280 in DirectX 9, 182 in DirectX 11, 104 in DirectX 10, and 44 in DirectX 12. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result is 3,322.
The MI300's theoretical specifications suggest far higher compute potential than the RX 9060, but the database shows zero measured results for it. The MI300 lists 47.87 TFLOPS FP32 and 47.87 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), while the RX 9060 lists 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 and 21.43 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1). On paper, the MI300 delivers 2.23 times the FP32 throughput of the RX 9060. The texture rate tells a similar story: the MI300 reaches 1,496.0 GTexel/s versus 334.9 GTexel/s for the RX 9060, a 4.47 times advantage. The pixel rate goes the other direction: the MI300 lists 0 MPixel/s because it has 0 ROPs, while the RX 9060 achieves 191.4 GPixel/s from 64 ROPs.
Memory bandwidth is where the MI300 dominates decisively. The MI300 has 5.32 TB/s of HBM3 bandwidth across an 8192-bit bus, while the RX 9060 has 288.0 GB/s of GDDR6 bandwidth across a 128-bit bus. That is an 18.5 times difference in raw memory bandwidth. The MI300 carries 128 GB of memory to the RX 9060's 8 GB, a 16 times capacity difference.
For the RX 9060, its nearest rival in the database is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with an average score of 16,129, a delta of -0.7 percent relative to the RX 9060. That means the RX 9060 trails the RTX 3060 Ti by 0.7 percent, a negligible margin. The AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15,862, which is 1 percent below the RX 9060. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15,852, also 1 percent below. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15,679, which is 2.1 percent below the RX 9060. These deltas show the RX 9060 sits in a tightly packed performance cluster around the 15,700 to 16,150 average score range.
The Verdict
The data presents an unusual comparison because one side has no measured results. The Instinct MI300 is a compute accelerator with no display outputs, no DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan API support, and no benchmark scores in the database. The Radeon RX 9060 is a consumer graphics card with full API support, ten recorded benchmark scores, and a percentile ranking of 59.
For users who need a graphics card for rendering, display output, or DirectX-based workloads, the RX 9060 is the only option with data supporting its capabilities. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and it provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs. The MI300 lists "No outputs" and "N/A" for all three graphics APIs, so it cannot function as a display adapter.
For users who need massive memory capacity and bandwidth for compute workloads, the MI300's specifications indicate it was built for that purpose. Its 128 GB of HBM3 memory with 5.32 TB/s bandwidth, 153,000 million transistors, and 1017 mm² die size point to a server or datacenter part designed for large-scale computation. The RX 9060's 8 GB of GDDR6 with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is a consumer-class memory configuration.
The RX 9060's nearest rival data shows it performs within 2.1 percent of four other GPUs, which indicates it is a mid-range performer relative to the database population. Its average score of 16,014 and its 59th percentile rank confirm this positioning. The MI300, with no scores, cannot be positioned relative to any of these rivals.
A user selecting between these two parts would be choosing between a compute accelerator with no measured benchmark data and a consumer graphics card with documented performance. The MI300's power requirements are substantially higher: 600 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 1000 W and 2x 8-pin connectors, versus 132 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 300 W and 1x 8-pin connector. The MI300 also uses a 5 nm process node while the RX 9060 uses a 4 nm node, both from TSMC.
Architecture Differences
The MI300 uses the CDNA 3.0 architecture on a chip called Aqua Vanjaram, while the RX 9060 uses the RDNA 4.0 architecture on a chip called Navi 44. These are fundamentally different design families: CDNA targets compute acceleration, RDNA targets graphics rendering.
The MI300 is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 153,000 million transistors on a 1017 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 150.4 million per mm². The RX 9060 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 149.2 million per mm². The MI300 has 5.15 times more transistors and a 5.11 times larger die, but the transistor density is nearly identical between the two, differing by only 1.2 million per mm².
The MI300 has 14,080 shading units, 880 texture mapping units, and 0 ROPs. It has no ray tracing cores listed and no tensor cores listed. The RX 9060 has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It has 28 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores listed. The RX 9060's shading unit count is 12.7 percent of the MI300's, and its TMU count is 12.7 percent as well, reflecting a similar ratio.
Memory architecture differs completely. The MI300 uses HBM3 with an 8192-bit bus and 5.32 TB/s bandwidth. The RX 9060 uses GDDR6 with a 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The MI300's memory clock is listed as 1300 MHz with 5.2 Gbps effective, while the RX 9060's is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The RX 9060's memory runs at a higher clock rate, but the MI300's vastly wider bus delivers far more aggregate bandwidth.
The MI300 is a dual-slot card with dimensions of 267 mm length and 111 mm height, while the RX 9060's dimensions are not recorded. Both use a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. The MI300 has no display outputs; the RX 9060 has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a.
Specification Differences
The two cards differ in nearly every recorded specification. The MI300 uses a 5 nm process; the RX 9060 uses 4 nm. The MI300 has 153,000 million transistors; the RX 9060 has 29,700 million. The MI300's die is 1017 mm²; the RX 9060's is 199 mm². Transistor density is 150.4M per mm² for the MI300 and 149.2M per mm² for the RX 9060.
Clock speeds differ substantially. The MI300 has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 1700 MHz. The RX 9060 has a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz. The RX 9060's boost clock is 76 percent higher than the MI300's boost clock.
Memory configuration differs in size, type, bus width, and bandwidth. The MI300 has 128 GB of HBM3 on an 8192-bit bus with 5.32 TB/s bandwidth. The RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clocks are 1300 MHz with 5.2 Gbps effective for the MI300 and 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for the RX 9060.
Compute unit counts differ: the MI300 has 14,080 shading units, 880 TMUs, and 0 ROPs. The RX 9060 has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. Pixel rate is 0 MPixel/s for the MI300 and 191.4 GPixel/s for the RX 9060. Texture rate is 1,496.0 GTexel/s for the MI300 and 334.9 GTexel/s for the RX 9060. FP32 and FP16 are both 47.87 TFLOPS for the MI300 and 21.43 TFLOPS for the RX 9060.
Power requirements differ by a wide margin. The MI300 has a TDP of 600 W, while the RX 9060 has a TDP of 132 W. The MI300 needs a 1000 W suggested PSU and 2x 8-pin connectors; the RX 9060 needs a 300 W suggested PSU and 1x 8-pin connector. The MI300 is rated for dual-slot width, while the RX 9060 is also dual-slot.
API support is exclusive to the RX 9060. It lists DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The MI300 lists N/A for all three. Display outputs follow the same pattern: the RX 9060 has HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1a, the MI300 has none.
Release dates differ by roughly two and a half years. The MI300 was released on January 3, 2023, and the RX 9060 on August 4, 2025. The MI300's predecessor is Radeon Instinct, while the RX 9060's predecessor is Navi III. The RX 9060 is listed as Active in production status; the MI300 has no production status recorded.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute throughput?
A: The AMD Instinct MI300 lists 47.87 TFLOPS FP32, which is 2.23 times the RX 9060's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32.
Q: Does the Instinct MI300 support DirectX?
A: No. The MI300 lists DirectX as N/A, along with OpenGL and Vulkan. The Radeon RX 9060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.
Q: How does the Radeon RX 9060 compare to the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16,014, while the RTX 3060 Ti has an average score of 16,129. The RX 9060 trails by 0.7 percent.
Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two cards?
A: The MI300 has 5.32 TB/s of HBM3 bandwidth, while the RX 9060 has 288.0 GB/s of GDDR6 bandwidth. The MI300's bandwidth is 18.5 times higher.
Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor density?
A: The MI300 has a density of 150.4 million transistors per mm², and the RX 9060 has 149.2 million per mm². The difference is 1.2 million per mm² in favor of the MI300.
Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the Instinct MI300?
A: The database contains no benchmark scores for the MI300. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. The RX 9060 has ten recorded scores, including an average of 16,014.