AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB and the AMD FirePro W4190M are graphics cards from different eras, built for entirely different purposes. The RTX 5060 Ti is a current-generation desktop GPU designed for high-performance gaming and compute, while the FirePro W4190M is an end-of-life mobile workstation part from 2015. The data in the database shows a massive performance gap, but the comparison also highlights architectural and feature differences that go beyond raw speed. This analysis breaks down where each card stands according to recorded benchmarks and specifications.

The Verdict

The choice between these two GPUs is not a real contest based on the recorded data. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB dominates every measurable category, with an average benchmark score of 4970 compared to the AMD FirePro W4190M’s 4505. The RTX 5060 Ti sits in the 29th percentile of all GPUs, while the FirePro W4190M sits in the 26th, meaning both are below the median, but the NVIDIA part does so with far more capability.

For any user building a desktop system today, the RTX 5060 Ti is the only rational choice. Its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, 4608 shading units, and support for modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 make it suitable for contemporary gaming and content creation. The FirePro W4190M, with its 2 GB GDDR5 memory and 384 shading units, is a legacy mobile chip that cannot handle modern workloads. It is best suited for someone maintaining an old laptop or a specialized embedded system where its MXM Module form factor is required. The data shows no scenario where the FirePro W4190M wins on performance, so the verdict is simple: pick the RTX 5060 Ti for any new build, and only consider the FirePro W4190M if you are replacing a part in an aging portable workstation.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two cards spans roughly a decade of GPU design. The RTX 5060 Ti uses the GB206 chip built on NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.0 million per square millimeter. In contrast, the FirePro W4190M uses the Opal chip based on AMD’s GCN 1.0 architecture, also made by TSMC but on a much older 28 nm process. That chip packs 950 million transistors on a 77 mm² die, with a density of just 12.3 million per square millimeter.

The RTX 5060 Ti features a modern GPU design with 36 dedicated ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores, which are absent from the FirePro W4190M. The NVIDIA card also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, while the AMD part tops out at DirectX 12 (11_1), Vulkan 1.2.170, and OpenGL 4.6. The FirePro W4190M has no ray tracing or tensor core support, and its GCN 1.0 architecture predates many modern rendering features. The process node difference alone explains much of the performance gap: the RTX 5060 Ti has roughly 23 times more transistors and operates at a base clock of 2407 MHz versus the FirePro’s 825 MHz base and 900 MHz boost.

Memory architecture also differs fundamentally. The RTX 5060 Ti uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The FirePro W4190M uses 2 GB of GDDR5 on the same 128-bit bus, but only achieves 64.00 GB/s. The RTX 5060 Ti’s memory clock is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), while the FirePro’s is 1000 MHz (4 Gbps effective). These are not minor tweaks; they represent two entirely different design philosophies separated by a decade of memory technology.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark data, the RTX 5060 Ti wins in every recorded test. It has a PassMark G3D score of 22618, a PassMark GPU Compute score of 11224, and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4019. The FirePro W4190M only has one recorded benchmark, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 4505, which cannot be directly compared to the NVIDIA tests but still places it in a lower percentile. The database shows no benchmark where the FirePro W4190M outperforms the RTX 5060 Ti.

The RTX 5060 Ti also shows strength in legacy DirectX tests, scoring 238 in PassMark DirectX 9, 219 in DirectX 11, 144 in DirectX 10, and 89 in DirectX 12. The FirePro W4190M has no such recorded scores, so the data cannot confirm any legacy performance advantage. In practical terms, the RTX 5060 Ti is the clear winner for gaming, rendering, compute workloads, and even older API titles. The FirePro W4190M’s only potential edge is its mobile form factor and low power requirements, as it has no external power connectors and draws much less than the RTX 5060 Ti’s 180 W TDP, though the database does not list a TDP for the AMD card.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, while the AMD FirePro W4190M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory. Both use a 128-bit bus, but the RTX 5060 Ti’s bandwidth is 448.0 GB/s versus 64.00 GB/s for the FirePro.

Q: Does the FirePro W4190M support ray tracing?

A: No, the database lists no ray tracing cores for the FirePro W4190M, and its GCN 1.0 architecture does not include this feature. The RTX 5060 Ti has 36 dedicated ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The RTX 5060 Ti is listed as Active, with a release date of 2025-04-15, while the FirePro W4190M is End-of-life, released in 2015-11-11.

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 4970, which is higher than the FirePro W4190M’s 4505. The RTX 5060 Ti’s percentiles range from 29% of all GPUs, while the FirePro sits at 26%.

Q: Can the FirePro W4190M be used in a desktop PC?

A: The database lists its slot width as MXM Module, which is a mobile form factor. The RTX 5060 Ti is Dual-slot, designed for desktop installation. The FirePro’s display outputs are listed as Portable Device Dependent, confirming it is not a standard desktop card.

Q: What power connectors does each card require?

A: The RTX 5060 Ti requires a single 8-pin power connector and has a suggested PSU of 450 W. The FirePro W4190M has no power connectors listed, as it is designed for mobile systems.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not list any direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two cards, with zero wins recorded for either side in such tests. However, the individual benchmark scores tell a clear story. The RTX 5060 Ti’s PassMark G3D score of 22618 is a massive figure, while the FirePro W4190M’s only recorded benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL at 4505, falls far below comparable modern scores. The RTX 5060 Ti also achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4019, which is a modern test that the FirePro W4190M cannot run due to its older DirectX 12 (11_1) support.

In compute tasks, the RTX 5060 Ti delivers 23.70 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the FirePro W4190M manages only 691.2 GFLOPS, a difference of over 34 times. The pixel rate of the RTX 5060 Ti is 123.5 GPixel/s versus 7.200 GPixel/s for the FirePro, and the texture rate is 370.4 GTexel/s versus 21.60 GTexel/s. These are not close figures; they represent a generational leap that makes comparison almost meaningless outside of a legacy context.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between these two cards are extensive, and the database lists several fields where they diverge completely. The RTX 5060 Ti has 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units, while the FirePro W4190M has 384 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The RTX 5060 Ti also includes 36 ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores, which the FirePro lacks entirely. The clock speeds differ sharply: the RTX 5060 Ti runs at 2407 MHz base and 2572 MHz boost, whereas the FirePro runs at 825 MHz base and 900 MHz boost.

Memory capacity and type are also different. The RTX 5060 Ti uses 16 GB of GDDR7, while the FirePro uses 2 GB of GDDR5. The RTX 5060 Ti’s memory bandwidth is 448.0 GB/s, compared to 64.00 GB/s for the FirePro. The bus interface differs as well: the RTX 5060 Ti uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while the FirePro uses PCIe 3.0 x8. The RTX 5060 Ti has a TDP of 180 W and is a dual-slot card with one 8-pin connector and a suggested 450 W PSU, while the FirePro is an MXM Module with no power connectors and no listed TDP or PSU requirement. Display outputs also differ: the RTX 5060 Ti has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the FirePro’s outputs are listed as Portable Device Dependent.

The process node, transistor count, and die size are all different, as detailed earlier. The RTX 5060 Ti’s FP16 performance is listed at 23.70 TFLOPS (1:1), while the FirePro has no recorded FP16 capability. Finally, the RTX 5060 Ti has a launch MSRP of 429 USD, while the FirePro W4190M has no listed launch MSRP. These differences confirm that the RTX 5060 Ti is a modern, high-capability GPU, while the FirePro W4190M is a legacy mobile part with limited relevance outside of its original niche.