AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB Comparison
AMD FirePro W2100
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB and the AMD FirePro W2100 represent two entirely different eras of GPU design. The RTX 5060 Ti is a modern, high-performance consumer card built on a high-end process, while the FirePro W2100 is a legacy, low-power workstation card from a decade prior. The benchmark data shows a complete and total generational gulf, with the RTX 5060 Ti dominating every measurable category where data exists. This analysis relies strictly on recorded database measurements and specifications.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark runs between these two cards, but the individual benchmark suites paint an unmistakable picture. The RTX 5060 Ti's average benchmark score is recorded at 4970, while the FirePro W2100 sits at 4295. This places the RTX 5060 Ti in the 29th percentile of all GPUs, and the FirePro W2100 in the 25th percentile. While the percentile gap seems small, the raw scores tell a different story.
The RTX 5060 Ti's closest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA Quadro 4000 (avg score 4979, delta -0.2%), the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics (4998, delta -0.6%), the AMD Radeon R7 M360 (4931, delta +0.8%), and the AMD Radeon R7 M265 (4929, delta +0.8%). This means the RTX 5060 Ti performs almost identically to those cards in aggregate, with a delta of less than one percent in either direction. The FirePro W2100's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M (4282, delta +0.3%), the AMD Radeon Vega 3 (4268, delta +0.6%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 (4335, delta -0.9%), and the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M (4241, delta +1.3%). Again, the deltas are all within 1.3%, making the FirePro's aggregate performance comparable to those specific legacy and entry-level parts.
The real divergence appears in the specific benchmark tests. The RTX 5060 Ti records a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4019, a test that the FirePro W2100 has no recorded result for. In PassMark tests, the RTX 5060 Ti scores 22618 in G3D, 11224 in GPU Compute, 1206 in G2D, 238 in DirectX 9, 219 in DirectX 11, 144 in DirectX 10, and 89 in DirectX 12. The FirePro W2100 has no PassMark results in the database. Instead, it has Geekbench results: 4093 in OpenCL and 4497 in Vulkan. The RTX 5060 Ti has no Geekbench scores recorded. With no overlapping benchmark tests, the only direct numeric comparison available is the average score, where the RTX 5060 Ti leads by 675 points, which is a 15.7% advantage over the FirePro's average.
FAQ
Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB has an average benchmark score of 4970, while the AMD FirePro W2100 has an average score of 4295. The RTX 5060 Ti leads by 675 points.
Q: How does each card compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The RTX 5060 Ti's closest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro 4000 with an average score of 4979, meaning the RTX 5060 Ti trails it by 0.2%. Its other rivals, the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and R7 M360, are within 0.8%. The FirePro W2100's closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M at 4282, which the FirePro beats by 0.3%. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 by 0.9%.
Q: What is the performance percentile for each card?
A: The RTX 5060 Ti is in the 29th percentile of all GPUs. The FirePro W2100 is in the 25th percentile.
Q: Are there any benchmark tests where both cards have recorded scores?
A: No. The database shows the RTX 5060 Ti with results in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and PassMark tests, while the FirePro W2100 only has Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan results. There is no overlap.
Q: What is the production status of each card?
A: The RTX 5060 Ti is listed as Active, while the FirePro W2100 is listed as End-of-life.
Architecture Differences
The architectural gap between these two GPUs is immense. The RTX 5060 Ti is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB206 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 21,900 million transistors on a die size of 181 mm², yielding a transistor density of 121.0 million transistors per mm². The FirePro W2100 uses the older GCN 1.0 architecture with the Oland chip, built on a 28 nm process, also at TSMC. It has just 950 million transistors on a 77 mm² die, with a density of 12.3 million transistors per mm².
The RTX 5060 Ti features 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It also includes dedicated hardware for ray tracing with 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores for AI workloads. The FirePro W2100 has only 320 shading units, 20 TMUs, and 8 ROPs, with no RT cores and no tensor cores available. The RTX 5060 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The FirePro W2100 supports DirectX 12 (11_1), Vulkan 1.2.170, and OpenGL 4.6.
The memory subsystems are equally divergent. The RTX 5060 Ti uses 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The FirePro W2100 uses 2 GB of DDR3 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of only 28.80 GB/s. The RTX 5060 Ti's FP32 compute is 23.70 TFLOPS, while the FirePro W2100 manages 435.2 GFLOPS. Pixel rate is 123.5 GPixel/s for the RTX 5060 Ti versus 5.440 GPixel/s for the FirePro, and texture rate is 370.4 GTexel/s versus 13.60 GTexel/s.
Specification Differences
The two cards differ in nearly every recorded specification field. Clock speeds: the RTX 5060 Ti has a base clock of 2407 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The FirePro W2100 has a base clock of 630 MHz and a boost of 680 MHz, with memory at 900 MHz (1800 Mbps effective).
Memory capacity and type differ completely: 16 GB GDDR7 versus 2 GB DDR3. The bus width is identical at 128 bit, but bandwidth is 448.0 GB/s versus 28.80 GB/s. Power requirements show a massive difference: the RTX 5060 Ti has a TDP of 180 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The FirePro W2100 has a TDP of 26 W, requires no power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of only 200 W.
Physical dimensions vary significantly. The RTX 5060 Ti is 241 mm (9.5 inches) long, 111 mm (4.4 inches) high, and 40 mm (1.6 inches) wide, taking up a dual-slot width. The FirePro W2100 is 168 mm (6.6 inches) long and 69 mm (2.7 inches) high, with a single-slot width. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x8 for the RTX 5060 Ti and PCIe 3.0 x8 for the FirePro.
Display outputs also differ: the RTX 5060 Ti has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the FirePro W2100 has 2x DisplayPort 1.2. Release dates are far apart: the RTX 5060 Ti was released on 2025-04-15, while the FirePro W2100 was released on 2014-08-11. The RTX 5060 Ti has a launch MSRP of 429 USD. The FirePro W2100 has no recorded launch MSRP.
The Verdict
The data is unambiguous. The RTX 5060 Ti is a vastly more powerful and capable GPU in every measurable way. Its FP32 compute of 23.70 TFLOPS is more than 50 times the FirePro's 435.2 GFLOPS. Its memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s is over 15 times higher. It has 14 times more shading units, 7 times more TMUs, and 6 times more ROPs. Its average benchmark score is 675 points higher, and it supports modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, while the FirePro is limited to older feature levels.
The FirePro W2100 does have one advantage: power consumption. At 26 W TDP with no power connectors, it is far more efficient in absolute terms than the RTX 5060 Ti's 180 W TDP. It is also a smaller, single-slot card. However, these advantages come with a massive performance penalty. The FirePro's production status is End-of-life, whereas the RTX 5060 Ti is Active.
For anyone building a system today, the choice is clear. The RTX 5060 Ti is the only viable option for modern gaming, content creation, or compute workloads. The FirePro W2100 is a legacy part that belongs in the context of 2014-era systems, not modern builds. The RTX 5060 Ti's 29th percentile ranking, while not exceptional, places it far above the FirePro's 25th percentile in absolute scoring terms.
Where Each One Wins
The RTX 5060 Ti wins in every benchmark category where data exists. In the database, it records strong PassMark G3D and GPU Compute scores of 22618 and 11224 respectively, indicating solid general 3D rendering and compute capability. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4019 confirms it can handle modern DirectX 12 workloads. It is the clear choice for gaming, 3D rendering, AI inference, and any task requiring high memory bandwidth or massive FP32 throughput.
The FirePro W2100 has no recorded wins in any benchmark category. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 4093 and Vulkan score of 4497 are its only data points, and there is no comparable RTX 5060 Ti result to measure against. Its strengths lie entirely in its physical and power profile: a 26 W TDP, single-slot design, and no power connector requirement make it suitable for low-power, space-constrained, or legacy systems where maximum performance is not the goal. For applications that only require basic display output, 2D workloads, or very light compute, the FirePro's low power draw and small footprint are its only practical advantages. For any modern, performance-sensitive workload, the RTX 5060 Ti is the definitive pick.