AMD FirePro S7150 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Comparison

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell and AMD FirePro S7150 are two workstation-class graphics cards separated by nearly a decade of silicon evolution. The recorded data shows a decisive overall victory for the NVIDIA card, but the comparison is not merely about raw speed; it is a study in architectural philosophy. The RTX PRO 4500 is a modern, feature-rich compute and rendering monster, while the FirePro S7150 is a legacy server part with a specific, limited role. The benchmark data indicates the NVIDIA card wins the only shared test by an overwhelming margin, yet the AMD card retains a distinct niche due to its server-oriented design.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell wins in every scenario involving modern graphics workloads, ray tracing, and high-fidelity rendering. Its benchmark results are exceptional; the Geekbench Vulkan score of 221,768 is not just a win, it is a category-defining result. This card is built for tasks like real-time 3D visualization, complex CAD model interaction, and GPU-accelerated rendering where the latest DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 features are mandatory. The presence of dedicated RT cores and tensor cores further cements its dominance in ray-traced workflows and AI-assisted tasks, even though specific benchmark scores for those features are not in the database.

The AMD FirePro S7150 wins in a different arena: legacy server deployment and compute tasks that do not require display output. Its complete lack of display outputs, combined with a single-slot design and 150 W TDP, positions it for dense server racks where physical space and power efficiency are paramount. While its Geekbench Vulkan score of 29,690 is far lower, it is a functional score for a card that prioritizes compute throughput over graphics. Its GCN 3.0 architecture supports OpenCL, which is the only benchmark where it has a recorded score (26,543 in Geekbench OpenCL). For organizations running older compute stacks that rely on OpenCL, the FirePro S7150 remains a serviceable, if outdated, option.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two cards is vast, reflecting their release dates. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 uses the GB203 chip built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, packing 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die. This results in a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². It employs the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, which is a modern design with 10,496 shading units, 328 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 82 RT cores, and 328 tensor cores. This hardware is designed for parallel processing, real-time ray tracing, and matrix math, all essential for contemporary graphics and AI workloads.

In contrast, the AMD FirePro S7150 uses the Tonga chip on a 28 nm process, also from TSMC, but with only 5,000 million transistors on a 366 mm² die, yielding a density of 13.7 million per mm². Its GCN 3.0 architecture is from an era before dedicated RT or tensor cores, featuring 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The lack of specialized cores means it handles ray tracing and AI through brute-force shader computation, which is inefficient. The memory subsystems are equally divergent: the NVIDIA card uses 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus for 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD card uses 8 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus for 160.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card also supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the AMD card is limited to PCIe 3.0 x16.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has an average benchmark score of 31,532, which places it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs. The AMD FirePro S7150 has an average score of 28,117, sitting in the 73rd percentile.

Q: How do the two cards compare in the Geekbench Vulkan test?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 221,768, which is 646.9% higher than the AMD FirePro S7150's score of 29,690. This is the only benchmark test shared by both cards in the database.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each card?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 256-bit bus and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD FirePro S7150 features 8 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 256-bit bus and 160.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the AMD FirePro S7150 support display outputs?

A: No, the AMD FirePro S7150 has no display outputs. It is designed for server-side compute tasks, whereas the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is listed as Active, with a release date of March 17, 2025. The AMD FirePro S7150 is End-of-life, having been released on January 31, 2016.

Q: Which card has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has a pixel rate of 269.6 GPixel/s, which is significantly higher than the AMD FirePro S7150's 29.44 GPixel/s.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ fundamentally across nearly every specification category. The process node is a major differentiator: 5 nm for NVIDIA versus 28 nm for AMD. Transistor counts are 45,600 million versus 5,000 million. Die size is comparable (378 mm² vs 366 mm²), but transistor density is vastly different at 120.6M / mm² versus 13.7M / mm². Clock speeds are also divergent; the NVIDIA card has a base clock of 1635 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz, while the AMD card has no recorded base or boost clocks, only a memory clock of 1250 MHz.

Memory configurations are entirely different: 32 GB GDDR7 with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 8 GB GDDR5 with 160.0 GB/s bandwidth. The compute units are not comparable in count: 10,496 shading units, 328 TMUs, and 112 ROPs for NVIDIA, versus 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 ROPs for AMD. NVIDIA has 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores; AMD has none. The FP32 performance is 50.53 TFLOPS for NVIDIA versus 3.768 TFLOPS for AMD. Power consumption differs, with NVIDIA at 200 W and AMD at 150 W. The NVIDIA card is dual-slot with a 1x 16-pin connector and a suggested 550 W PSU, while the AMD card is single-slot with a 1x 6-pin connector and a suggested 450 W PSU. The bus interface also differs: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs are present on NVIDIA (4x DisplayPort 2.1b) and absent on AMD.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains only one head-to-head benchmark between these two cards: Geekbench Vulkan. In this test, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 221,768, while the AMD FirePro S7150 scores 29,690. The delta is 646.9%, meaning the NVIDIA card is nearly seven and a half times faster in this specific API workload. This is not a marginal victory; it represents a generational leap in graphics processing capability. The NVIDIA card's score is so high that it outpaces its own nearest rivals in the database, which include the NVIDIA TITAN RTX (average score 31,676) and the Intel Arc Pro A30M (average score 31,894). The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500's Vulkan result alone is more than seven times its own average benchmark score, indicating that Vulkan is a particularly strong workload for this architecture.

For the AMD FirePro S7150, the only other recorded benchmark is Geekbench OpenCL, where it scores 26,543. This is a modest result, and it aligns with its overall average of 28,117. The card's nearest rivals in the database, such as the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti (average score 28,020) and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X (average score 27,973), are all within a 1% delta of its average score, showing that the FirePro S7150 is competitive with older high-end consumer cards but not with modern workstation parts.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the superior card for nearly every use case. Its 646.9% lead in the Vulkan benchmark is a clear indicator of its dominance. For professionals working in 3D modeling, animation, video editing, or any field that requires real-time graphics rendering, the NVIDIA card is the only rational choice. Its 32 GB of GDDR7 memory provides ample capacity for large scenes and datasets, and its support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with the latest software. The inclusion of RT and tensor cores makes it future-proof for ray-traced and AI-accelerated workflows.

The AMD FirePro S7150, however, is not without a purpose. Its single-slot, 150 W design and lack of display outputs make it an ideal candidate for server environments where the card is used solely for compute acceleration, particularly in legacy OpenCL-based applications. Its end-of-life status and 28 nm process mean it is a dated part, but for organizations with existing GCN-based compute stacks, it can still serve in a supporting role. The launch MSRP of 2,399 USD for the FirePro S7150 reflects its original server-grade positioning, but the performance data shows it is now a low-end option. Ultimately, the choice is between a modern, high-performance workstation GPU and a legacy server compute card. The benchmark results strongly favor the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell for anyone needing graphics performance, while the AMD FirePro S7150 retains a narrow, specialized niche in server compute.