AMD Radeon R9 M375
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Radeon R9 M375 Specifications
Radeon R9 M375 GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The AMD Radeon R9 M375 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
R9 M375 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Radeon R9 M375's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Radeon R9 M375 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's Radeon R9 M375 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Radeon R9 M375's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
Radeon R9 M375 by AMD Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the R9 M375, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
R9 M375 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD Radeon R9 M375 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
GCN 1.0 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Radeon R9 M375 is built on AMD's GCN 1.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the R9 M375 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's Radeon R9 M375 Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the AMD Radeon R9 M375 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Radeon R9 M375 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Radeon R9 M375 by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the AMD Radeon R9 M375 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD Radeon R9 M375. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Radeon R9 M375 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Radeon R9 M375 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Radeon R9 M375 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
Radeon R9 M375 Benchmark Scores
geekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how AMD Radeon R9 M375 handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations. OpenCL is widely supported across different GPU vendors and platforms. Higher scores benefit applications that leverage GPU acceleration for non-graphics workloads.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby Performersgeekbench_vulkanSource
Geekbench Vulkan tests GPU compute using the modern low-overhead Vulkan API. This shows how AMD Radeon R9 M375 performs with next-generation graphics and compute workloads.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
About AMD Radeon R9 M375
The AMD Radeon R9 M375 is a mobile graphics solution built on the 28 nm GCN 1.0 architecture, specifically the Tropo chip, and it is now designated as end-of-life. With an average benchmark score of 10001, it sits at the 47th percentile of all GPUs, placing it in the lower-middle tier of performance. This is a part designed for basic 3D acceleration and older gaming titles, not for high-refresh-rate or high-detail modern experiences.
Who Should Consider It
The data positions the R9 M375 as a solution for users who prioritize basic graphical functionality over performance. Given its 2 GB DDR3 memory and 28.80 GB/s bandwidth, the benchmark results indicate this card is suited for 720p gaming at low to medium settings in less demanding titles. Users attempting 1080p gaming will find the memory subsystem and compute capabilities of 1,299.2 GFLOPS to be a significant bottleneck, often requiring the lowest possible settings and even then struggling with more recent releases.
The 47th percentile ranking underscores that this is not a card for enthusiasts or gamers seeking smooth frame rates in modern AAA games. It is more appropriate for a productivity laptop where occasional light gaming is a secondary consideration. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 10320 suggests some utility in GPU-accelerated applications, but the overall performance envelope is limited. For any serious gaming or content creation workload, the data strongly suggests looking elsewhere, as the R9 M375's capabilities are firmly rooted in the entry-level segment of its era.
Memory Subsystem
The R9 M375 is equipped with 2 GB of DDR3 memory on a 128-bit bus. This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of just 28.80 GB/s, a figure that critically hampers performance at higher resolutions. The memory clock runs at 900 MHz, or 1800 Mbps effective, which is low by modern standards. For 1080p gaming, this bandwidth is insufficient, causing texture streaming and frame pacing issues in many games.
The 2 GB VRAM capacity is another limiting factor. Modern game assets can easily exceed this, leading to texture pop-in and stuttering. While the 128-bit bus is a common design for entry-level parts, the combination of low clock speed and DDR3 (rather than GDDR5) memory makes this a very weak memory subsystem. Benchmark results confirm that the card's overall score is dragged down by this bottleneck, making it unsuitable for high-resolution textures or demanding visual effects.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The R9 M375 has no dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores, as it is based on the older GCN 1.0 architecture. This means hardware-accelerated ray tracing is entirely absent. The card does support DirectX 12 (11_1), but this is a feature-level support, not a full implementation, which may limit compatibility with some modern titles that require a higher DirectX 12 feature level.
The API support includes OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.2.170, which allows for compatibility with modern software on those fronts. However, the lack of dedicated hardware for advanced features means that any ray tracing effects would have to be handled in software, which is not a viable option given the card's compute throughput of 1,299.2 GFLOPS. The feature set is essentially basic, offering no forward-looking capabilities beyond standard rasterization.
How It Compares
The R9 M375's position is best understood by examining its nearest rivals in the benchmark database.
vs. AMD FirePro W5000: The R9 M375 scores a 0% delta against the FirePro W5000, with average scores of 10001 and 9999, respectively. This indicates that despite being a mobile part from a later generation, the R9 M375 offers virtually identical performance to this older workstation card. The data implies that the architectural advantages of the newer chip are offset by its lower power envelope and memory configuration, resulting in a statistical tie.
vs. AMD Radeon RX 550X: The RX 550X scores an average of 10095, which is 0.9% higher than the R9 M375. This is a marginal difference, placing the two cards in the same performance class. The benchmark data suggests that while the RX 550X is technically the faster part, the real-world difference would be imperceptible in most applications. This comparison highlights how close the R9 M375 is to a newer entry-level offering.
vs. AMD Radeon Pro 5300M: The R9 M375 is 1.2% ahead of the Pro 5300M, which scores 9881. This is a surprising result, given that the Pro 5300M is a much more modern part. The delta is small, but it shows the R9 M375 holding its own in synthetic benchmarks. This could be due to driver optimizations or the specific workload of the Geekbench tests, but the data clearly places them in the same performance tier.
vs. NVIDIA Quadro P4000: The Quadro P4000 has an average score of 10134, making it 1.3% faster than the R9 M375. This is another very close comparison, with the NVIDIA professional card edging out the AMD mobile chip. The delta is within the margin of error for synthetic testing, indicating that the R9 M375 is competitive with a much more expensive workstation GPU in this specific benchmark context.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon R9 M375?
A: The average benchmark score is 10001, based on the Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan results.
Q: Does the R9 M375 support hardware ray tracing?
A: No, the card has no ray tracing cores, as it is based on the GCN 1.0 architecture.
Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this GPU?
A: The memory bandwidth is 28.80 GB/s, which is provided by 2 GB of DDR3 memory on a 128-bit bus.
Q: How does the R9 M375 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 550X?
A: The R9 M375 is 0.9% slower than the RX 550X, making them nearly equivalent in performance.
Q: What is the transistor count and die size?
A: The Tropo chip contains 1,500 million transistors on a 123 mm² die, manufactured on a 28 nm process at TSMC.
Q: What is the peak FP32 performance?
A: The card can deliver 1,299.2 GFLOPS of single-precision compute performance.
Power and Cooling
The FACT PACK does not include a TDP figure, a suggested PSU rating, or power connector requirements for the R9 M375. As a mobile part, its power draw is designed to fit within the thermal envelope of a laptop chassis. The absence of this data means that system integrators were responsible for providing adequate cooling, typically a combination of heat pipes and fans.
For a desktop user seeking to adapt this card, the data suggests it would require a minimal power supply, but no specific wattage is available. The 28 nm process node and the relatively low clock speeds of 1000 MHz base and 1015 MHz boost imply a modest thermal output. However, without concrete numbers, any power supply recommendation would be speculative. The lack of a slot width or dimensions also indicates that this is a custom board design intended for a specific laptop model, not a standardized add-in card.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmark data provides a clear picture of the R9 M375's performance class. It scores 10320 in Geekbench OpenCL and 9682 in Geekbench Vulkan, resulting in an average score of 10001. This places it at the 47th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms less than half of the devices in the database. This is a solidly entry-level result.
The closest competitor, the AMD Radeon RX 550X, is only 0.9% faster, showing that the R9 M375 is not definitively outclassed by a newer entry-level part. The FirePro W5000 is a perfect tie at 0% delta, and the R9 M375 is 1.2% ahead of the Radeon Pro 5300M. The only card to clearly beat it is the Quadro P4000, which is 1.3% faster.
These deltas are all within a very narrow band of approximately 2.5%, indicating that the R9 M375 sits in a crowded performance tier. The data implies that while it is not a high performer, it is not dramatically slower than several other options in its class. The FP32 throughput of 1,299.2 GFLOPS and texture rate of 40.60 GTexel/s are consistent with this mid-to-low-tier positioning. The pixel rate of 16.24 GPixel/s is a further limitation, confirming that this is a chip designed for basic tasks rather than high-fidelity rendering.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of Radeon R9 M375
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular AMD Radeon R9 M375 Comparisons
See how the Radeon R9 M375 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Radeon R9 M375 with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs