RADEON

AMD Radeon R7 350

AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores

2 GB
VRAM
โ€”
MHz Boost
55W
TDP
128
Bus Width

AMD Radeon R7 350 Specifications

โš™๏ธ

Radeon R7 350 GPU Core

Shader units and compute resources

The AMD Radeon R7 350 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.

Shading Units
512
Shaders
512
TMUs
32
ROPs
16
Compute Units
8
โฑ๏ธ

R7 350 Clock Speeds

GPU and memory frequencies

Clock speeds directly impact the Radeon R7 350's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Radeon R7 350 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.

GPU Clock
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz 4.5 Gbps effective
GDDR GDDR 6X 6X

AMD's Radeon R7 350 Memory

VRAM capacity and bandwidth

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Radeon R7 350's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.

Memory Size
2 GB
VRAM
2,048 MB
Memory Type
GDDR5
VRAM Type
GDDR5
Memory Bus
128 bit
Bus Width
128-bit
Bandwidth
72.00 GB/s
๐Ÿ’พ

Radeon R7 350 by AMD Cache

On-chip cache hierarchy

On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the R7 350, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.

L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache
256 KB
๐Ÿ“ˆ

R7 350 Theoretical Performance

Compute and fill rates

Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD Radeon R7 350 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.

FP32 (Float)
819.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (Double)
51.20 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
๐Ÿ—๏ธ

GCN 1.0 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The AMD Radeon R7 350 is built on AMD's GCN 1.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the R7 350 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.

Architecture
GCN 1.0
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Process Node
28 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
1,500 million
Die Size
123 mmยฒ
Density
12.2M / mmยฒ
๐Ÿ”Œ

AMD's Radeon R7 350 Power & Thermal

TDP and power requirements

Power specifications for the AMD Radeon R7 350 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Radeon R7 350 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.

TDP
55 W
TDP
55W
Power Connectors
None
Suggested PSU
250 W
๐Ÿ“

Radeon R7 350 by AMD Physical & Connectivity

Dimensions and outputs

Physical dimensions of the AMD Radeon R7 350 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.

Slot Width
Single-slot
Length
168 mm 6.6 inches
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Display Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 1.4a1x DisplayPort 1.2
Display Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 1.4a1x DisplayPort 1.2
๐ŸŽฎ

AMD API Support

Graphics and compute APIs

API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD Radeon R7 350. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.

DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
OpenGL
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
Vulkan
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
๐Ÿ“ฆ

Radeon R7 350 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The AMD Radeon R7 350 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Radeon R7 350 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Jul 2016
Production
End-of-life
Predecessor
Volcanic Islands
Successor
Arctic Islands

Radeon R7 350 Benchmark Scores

geekbench_openclSource

Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how AMD Radeon R7 350 handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations.

geekbench_opencl #386 of 582
7,792
2%
Max: 380,114
Compare with other GPUs

geekbench_vulkanSource

Geekbench Vulkan tests GPU compute using the modern low-overhead Vulkan API. This shows how AMD Radeon R7 350 performs with next-generation graphics and compute workloads. Vulkan offers better CPU efficiency than older APIs like OpenGL.

geekbench_vulkan #318 of 386
7,057
2%
Max: 379,571

About AMD Radeon R7 350

  1. The AMD Radeon R7 350 offers a budget-friendly price-to-performance ratio, delivering solid 1080p gaming at medium settings with its 2 GB GDDR5 VRAM and GCN 1.0 architecture. While its 28 nm process and 55 W TDP make it power-efficient, it struggles with modern AAA titles requiring higher memory bandwidth. The R7 350 remains a viable option for older games or casual play, but its 7,792 Geekbench OpenCL score highlights limitations in compute-heavy workloads.
  2. Competitive alternatives like the R7 360 and 370 provide better performance at similar price points, while entry-level NVIDIA options such as the GTX 750 Ti or RX 550 may outperform the R7 350 in specific benchmarks. The R7 350โ€™s Vulkan score of 7,057 underscores its balanced but dated capabilities, making it less competitive against newer cards with RDNA or Ampere architectures. Gamers seeking value should compare these alternatives based on their preferred titles and resolution targets.
  3. The R7 350โ€™s longevity is constrained by its 2016 release date and GCN 1.0 design, which lack optimizations for modern APIs and ray tracing. While it can handle 1080p gaming for a few years, future-proofing is limited without upgrades. For systems prioritizing cost over cutting-edge performance, the R7 350 still offers a smooth experience in older titles, but its 2 GB VRAM may bottleneck newer games at higher settings. Its 55 W TDP ensures compatibility with smaller power supplies, a key plus for compact builds.
  4. Build recommendations for the R7 350 include pairing it with a mid-tier CPU and a budget-friendly motherboard to maximize value. Itโ€™s ideal for entry-level gaming rigs or secondary GPUs in multi-monitor setups. The R7 350โ€™s PCIe 3.0 x16 interface ensures compatibility with most 2016-era systems, though newer platforms may benefit from faster interfaces. Gamers prioritizing affordability over peak performance should consider the R7 350 as a starter GPU, but its 7,792 OpenCL score and 2 GB VRAM suggest itโ€™s best for less demanding workloads. For high-end gaming, alternatives like the RX 570 or GTX 1660 would be more future-proof than the R7 350.

The NVIDIA Equivalent of Radeon R7 350

Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

NVIDIA โ€ข 8 GB VRAM

View Specs Compare

Popular AMD Radeon R7 350 Comparisons

See how the Radeon R7 350 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare Radeon R7 350 with Other GPUs

Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse GPUs