Pc Building Simulator
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 95 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 36 | 51 | 72 |
| 1440p QHD | 65 | 69 | 97 | 137 |
| 1080p Full HD | 103 | 109 | 154 | 217 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
Pc Building Simulator with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and Intel Arc B580 produces a wide spread of frame rates depending on resolution and quality settings. The data set shows this combination is capable of high refresh rates at 1080p but becomes increasingly constrained as resolution climbs to 4K, with the gap between Low and Ultra settings highlighting where the graphics card becomes the primary performance limit.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of diminishing returns as resolution increases. At 1080p, the combo delivers 217 FPS on Low settings, which drops to 137 FPS at 1440p and 72 FPS at 4K. This represents a 37% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 67% reduction from 1080p to 4K on Low settings. The scaling is steeper than linear, indicating that pixel count is having a substantial impact on the rendering workload.
For Medium settings, the frame rate drops from 154 FPS at 1080p to 97 FPS at 1440p and 51 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 37% and 67% respectively, matching the Low setting pattern almost exactly. This consistency suggests the resolution scaling is independent of the quality preset, which points toward a fixed bottleneck that becomes more pronounced at higher pixel counts.
High settings show a similar trend: 109 FPS at 1080p drops to 69 FPS at 1440p (37% reduction) and then to 36 FPS at 4K (67% reduction from 1080p). The Ultra preset follows the same trajectory with 103 FPS at 1080p, 65 FPS at 1440p, and 34 FPS at 4K. The uniformity of these percentage drops across all four settings presets is notable — it indicates the limiting factor scales directly with resolution rather than with the complexity of the scene.
The data suggests the Intel Arc B580's 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth and 192-bit bus width is sufficient at 1080p but becomes progressively more stressed at higher resolutions. The frame rate halving from 1440p to 4K on every preset strongly indicates that fill rate and pixel throughput are the dominant constraints at 4K, rather than CPU processing power. The Ryzen 5 5600F with its 6 cores and 12 threads appears to keep pace at lower resolutions, but the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor as resolution increases.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain 60+ FPS?
A: The data shows 1440p is the highest resolution where all settings presets achieve at least 65 FPS. At 4K, only the Low preset reaches 72 FPS, while Medium drops to 51 FPS. For a consistent 60 FPS floor across presets, 1440p is the safe choice.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?
A: Across all four settings presets, the frame rate drops by approximately 67%. For example, High settings go from 109 FPS at 1080p to 36 FPS at 4K, while Low settings go from 217 FPS to 72 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more responsible for the performance at 1080p?
A: At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 217 FPS, which is well above typical display refresh rates. The Ryzen 5 5600F's 6 cores and 12 threads with a 4.00 GHz boost clock appear sufficient to feed the GPU at this resolution, since the frame rate drops significantly when resolution increases, indicating the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher pixel counts.
Q: Does the Ultra preset provide a meaningful improvement over High?
A: The difference is small. At 1080p, High delivers 109 FPS while Ultra delivers 103 FPS — only a 6 FPS difference. At 1440p, the gap narrows to 4 FPS (69 vs 65), and at 4K it is just 2 FPS (36 vs 34). The Ultra preset does not appear to offer a proportional visual return for the performance cost.
Q: What are the minimum FPS figures for Medium settings?
A: The data includes min FPS values only for Medium settings. At 1080p, the minimum is 131 FPS with a maximum of 177 FPS. At 1440p, the minimum is 83 FPS with a maximum of 112 FPS. At 4K, the minimum is 43 FPS with a maximum of 58 FPS.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations?
A: The combo ranks 2243 out of 3002 tested combinations. This places it in the lower half of all tested combos, but the measured FPS data shows it is still capable of playable frame rates at 1440p and below.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 5000 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Vermeer codename. It operates on a 7 nm process from TSMC, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The CPU has a 32 MB shared L3 cache, with 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 cache per core, and supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel configuration achieving 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.
In the context of Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU at higher resolutions. The benchmark data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 217 FPS, which suggests the 6-core processor is not holding back performance at this resolution. The PassMark single-thread score of 2872 and multithread score of 19236 indicate solid single-core and multi-core capabilities, placing the CPU in the 85th percentile among all CPUs.
The CPU's nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 with a delta of 0%, the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D with a delta of -0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 with a delta of -0.4%. These deltas are negligible, meaning the 5600F performs essentially identically to these alternatives in general benchmarks. The Intel Core i9-12900T trails by 0.5%.
For this simulation game, the CPU's 12 threads are likely sufficient for game logic and simulation calculations. The fact that frame rates scale nearly identically across all settings presets when resolution changes suggests the CPU is not the primary limiter — if it were, we would see inconsistent scaling patterns. The 4.00 GHz boost clock provides adequate single-thread performance for the game's simulation elements, and the 65 W TDP indicates efficient operation.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and Intel Arc B580 ranks 2243 out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the combo in the 25th percentile, meaning roughly three-quarters of tested combinations perform better. However, this ranking should be interpreted with caution, as it reflects the specific game's engine and how it utilizes the hardware rather than a universal measure of capability.
The GPU's individual percentile ranking is 68th among all GPUs, which is notably higher than the combo's in-game ranking. This discrepancy suggests that the game may not be fully utilizing the Arc B580's capabilities, or that the CPU is holding back performance in certain scenarios. The CPU's percentile of 85th among all CPUs is also higher than the combo's ranking, which further supports the idea that the game's engine is the limiting factor.
Within the GPU's nearest rivals, the Arc B580 is closely matched with the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (delta -0.2%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (delta 0.6%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (delta -0.7%). These small deltas indicate that in general GPU benchmarks, the Arc B580 performs similarly to these cards, despite their different ages and architectures. The combo ranking of 2243 suggests that Pc Building Simulator may not benefit from the Arc B580's specific strengths, such as its 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance.
The measured FPS data at 1080p shows the combo is capable of over 100 FPS on all presets, which is a solid result. The ranking of 2243 out of 3002 may reflect that many other combos achieve even higher frame rates in this game, particularly those with more powerful GPUs that can maintain higher FPS at 4K resolution.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture with the BMG-G21 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process from TSMC. It features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, along with 20 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz for 19 Gbps effective speed across a 192-bit bus.
The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory provides 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for a card in this class. The GPU's pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 427.2 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 13.67 TFLOPS. These specifications suggest the card is designed for 1080p and 1440p gaming, which aligns with the measured FPS data.
In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution increases. At 1080p, the GPU can render the game at 217 FPS on Low settings, indicating it is not fully utilized. At 4K, the frame rate drops to 72 FPS on Low, showing that the GPU is working much harder to fill the additional pixels. The 4K Ultra preset delivers only 34 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay.
The GPU's benchmark scores include a PassMark G3D score of 15748 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672. The GPU's percentile ranking of 68th among all GPUs places it in the upper third of all graphics cards. The nearest rivals in average benchmark score are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP with a delta of -0.2%, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with a delta of 0.6%, and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 with a delta of -0.7%.
The combination of 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth appears sufficient for this game at 1440p, where the combo achieves 97 FPS on Medium settings. At 4K, the VRAM capacity may not be the issue, but rather the raw pixel throughput becomes the limiting factor, as evidenced by the consistent 67% frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K across all presets.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080 resolution, the combo delivers its strongest performance. Low settings produce an average of 217 FPS, Medium settings achieve 154 FPS with a minimum of 131 FPS and maximum of 177 FPS, High settings reach 109 FPS, and Ultra settings hit 103 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 114 FPS, showing that quality settings have a significant impact at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates decrease substantially. Low settings average 137 FPS, Medium settings average 97 FPS with a minimum of 83 FPS and maximum of 112 FPS, High settings average 69 FPS, and Ultra settings average 65 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 72 FPS, indicating that at higher resolutions, the GPU is becoming more saturated and the relative impact of settings is reduced.
At 3840x2160, the combo's performance drops considerably. Low settings maintain an average of 72 FPS, which is still playable, but Medium settings drop to 51 FPS with a minimum of 43 FPS and maximum of 58 FPS. High settings average 36 FPS, and Ultra settings average 34 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 38 FPS, which is the smallest absolute spread across all resolutions.
The Medium settings data provides the only minimum and maximum FPS figures in the entire dataset. At 1080p, the frame rate varies between 131 and 177 FPS, a range of 46 FPS. At 1440p, the range is 29 FPS (83 to 112), and at 4K, the range is 15 FPS (43 to 58). This tightening of the frame time variance at higher resolutions further confirms that the GPU is becoming the primary constraint.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1080p, all presets deliver over 100 FPS, making this resolution suitable for high refresh rate displays. The High preset at 109 FPS offers a good balance between visual quality and performance, while Ultra at 103 FPS provides a marginal improvement of 6 FPS less for potentially better visuals.
For 1440p gaming, the High preset at 69 FPS is the highest quality setting that maintains a 60+ FPS average. The Ultra preset at 65 FPS is also above 60 FPS but offers only a 4 FPS difference from High. The Medium preset at 97 FPS provides a significant performance buffer for smoother frame pacing, and the data shows minimum FPS of 83 FPS, ensuring consistent gameplay without major dips.
At 4K resolution, the options are limited. The Low preset at 72 FPS is the only setting that achieves a smooth experience, while Medium drops to 51 FPS, which may be acceptable for slower-paced simulation gameplay. The High and Ultra presets at 36 FPS and 34 FPS respectively are below the threshold for smooth motion and are not recommended for a playable experience.
For the best overall experience, the Medium preset at 1440p appears to be the sweet spot. It delivers 97 FPS average with a minimum of 83 FPS, providing smooth gameplay with a reasonable level of visual quality. The 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for this configuration, and the 6-core CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution. Users with 1080p displays can confidently use Ultra settings, while 4K users should stick to Low settings to maintain playability.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600F
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + Intel Arc B580 in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 72.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 51.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 36.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 34.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 137.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 97.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 69.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 65.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 217.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 154.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 109.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 103.0 |
Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 5 5600F + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Pc Building Simulator with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600F + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.