Doom

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 presents a classic mid-range combination in Doom. The measured data reveals a system that scales predictably across resolutions, with the GPU acting as the primary constraint at higher settings. The 8-core, 16-thread CPU provides ample headroom, ensuring that the RTX 5050 is the bottleneck in most scenarios, though the gap narrows at lower settings where the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more relevant. This analysis explores the measured FPS across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, contextualizing the results against the combo's global rank and the individual component benchmarks.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 is the clearest indicator of where the bottleneck lies in this system. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 149 FPS at 1080p to 96 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 53 FPS, and then further to 52 FPS at 4K. This represents a 65% decrease in performance from 1080p to 4K, a substantial drop that points to the GPU being the limiting factor. The RTX 5050, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus, is being pushed to its limits as pixel count quadruples.

The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At Low, the system achieves 202 FPS at 1080p, 131 FPS at 1440p, and 71 FPS at 4K. The relative drop from 1080p to 4K is 131 FPS, or 65%, which is nearly identical to the High preset's drop. This uniformity in scaling suggests that the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints, regardless of the graphical load. The CPU is not causing a disproportionate bottleneck at lower resolutions, as the FPS gains from 1440p to 1080p are significant, indicating the GPU is still the main performer.

However, the data hints at a subtle CPU influence at 1080p. The jump from 4K to 1440p at Low settings is 60 FPS (71 to 131), while the jump from 1440p to 1080p is 71 FPS (131 to 202). This larger incremental gain at 1080p suggests the CPU is beginning to provide more frames than the GPU can render at higher resolutions, but at 1080p, the GPU is still able to utilize the CPU's output. The Ryzen 7 5700G's boost clock of 4.60 GHz and solid single-thread score of 899 in 3dmark are sufficient to feed the RTX 5050 at this resolution, but the GPU remains the ceiling.

At 4K, the performance is playable but not high-refresh-rate territory. The High preset yields 52 FPS, while Ultra drops to 43 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 28 FPS, which is a significant spread that underscores the GPU's workload. The data shows that this combo is not designed for 4K Ultra gaming, but it can handle 4K at lower presets with acceptable frame rates. The scaling pattern confirms that the RTX 5050 is the dominant component in determining FPS, with the CPU playing a supporting role that becomes more critical only at lower resolutions and settings.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050's specifications directly explain the measured FPS results. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, running at an effective 20 Gbps, provides a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. This is a modest figure for a modern GPU, and it explains why the High and Ultra presets at 4K struggle, with average FPS of 52 and 43 respectively. The 128-bit memory bus is a limiting factor at high resolutions, as the data throughput required for 4K textures and effects exceeds the available bandwidth.

The GPU's clock speeds are relatively high, with a base of 2317 MHz and a boost of 2572 MHz. This helps maintain performance at lower resolutions, as seen in the 202 FPS average at 1080p Low. The boost clock allows the GPU to stretch its legs when the CPU can keep up, which is evident in the significant FPS gains when moving from 4K to 1080p. The pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but they are insufficient for 4K at higher settings.

The RTX 5050's benchmark scores reinforce its position in this system. Its Passmark G3D score of 17326 places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it is a mid-range part. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, has a score of 20713, which is 1.6% higher, showing the RTX 5050 is competitive with older mid-range cards. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 is a more modern benchmark, and it suggests the GPU is capable of handling contemporary titles at 1080p and 1440p, but not at the highest settings in 4K.

The VRAM capacity is a critical factor. With only 8 GB, the RTX 5050 is on the edge for 4K gaming, where textures can easily exceed this limit. The measured data shows that the High preset at 4K averages 52 FPS, which is likely a result of the GPU having to manage memory constraints alongside compute tasks. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 43 FPS, further evidence that the GPU is overburdened. In contrast, at 1080p, the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient, allowing the GPU to focus on rendering rather than memory management, resulting in high FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 7 5700G and RTX 5050 ranks 1766 out of 2930 tested combos in Doom. This places it in the 60th percentile of all combinations, indicating a solid but not exceptional performance profile. The rank suggests that while this combo is capable of running the game well, there are many other combinations that achieve higher frame rates. The data implies that the RTX 5050 is the weaker link, as the CPU's benchmark scores are more favorable relative to its peers.

The CPU's percentile rank of 79 versus all CPUs is notably higher than the GPU's percentile rank of 66. This discrepancy highlights that the CPU is a stronger component in this pairing. The Ryzen 7 5700G's average benchmark score of 27051 is nearly identical to its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-9900K, which scores 27097, a minuscule 0.2% difference. This indicates the CPU is performing at a high level, capable of feeding a faster GPU than the RTX 5050.

The GPU's rank of 1766 is likely dragged down by the 4K results. At 1080p, the combo performs admirably, with the High preset averaging 149 FPS. However, the 4K Ultra result of 43 FPS is a significant outlier that likely affects the overall ranking. The data shows that the combo is better suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can achieve high frame rates, rather than 4K, where it falls short of the top-tier combinations.

The rank also reflects the balance of the system. A more powerful GPU, such as one with a higher Passmark G3D score, would likely push this combo higher in the rankings. The CPU's headroom is evident in the 1080p results, where the FPS is high enough to suggest that the GPU is the limiting factor. The 1766th rank out of 2930 is a fair assessment of a mid-range system that excels at lower resolutions but cannot compete with high-end setups at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best performance. The Low preset averages 202 FPS, with Medium at 176 FPS, High at 149 FPS, and Ultra at 122 FPS. The Medium preset has a min FPS of 150 and a max of 203, showing a tight range that indicates consistent performance. The difference between Low and Ultra is 80 FPS, which is a significant spread that gives players a wide range of options for balancing visual quality and frame rate.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong. The Low preset averages 131 FPS, Medium at 114 FPS, High at 96 FPS, and Ultra at 79 FPS. The Medium preset shows a min of 97 and a max of 131, which is a wider range than at 1080p, suggesting the GPU is working harder. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is notable, with the High preset losing 53 FPS, but the results are still playable for most gamers.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles. The Low preset averages 71 FPS, Medium at 62 FPS, High at 52 FPS, and Ultra at 43 FPS. The Medium preset has a min of 52 and a max of 71, which is a 19 FPS range, indicating significant frame time variance. The Ultra preset at 43 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold that many consider the minimum for smooth gameplay, and the High preset at 52 FPS is also borderline.

The data reveals a clear pattern: as resolution increases, the FPS drops are more pronounced at higher settings. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 80 FPS, but at 4K, it is only 28 FPS. This indicates that at 4K, the GPU is so constrained that changing settings has a diminishing impact on performance. The RTX 5050 is simply unable to provide a playable experience at 4K Ultra, and even at 4K High, the 52 FPS average is not ideal.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is a capable processor for this game, with 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture. Its base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz provide solid single-thread performance, which is crucial for Doom's engine. The 3dmark single-thread score of 899 is respectable, and the Passmark single-thread score of 3283 confirms its capability. This ensures that the CPU does not become a bottleneck at 1080p, where the GPU is often the limiting factor.

The CPU's multi-threaded performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12830.5 and a Passmark multithread score of 24419. While Doom is not heavily multi-threaded, the 16 threads provide headroom for background tasks and ensure smooth frame pacing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 27051 places it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-9900K, scores nearly identically, showing that the 5700G is a high-performing part.

The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 202 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's limit for this game. The 3dmark 2-thread score of 1758 suggests that the CPU can handle high frame rates, but the RTX 5050 is the one that determines the final output. At 1440p and 4K, the CPU is less of a factor, as the GPU's workload increases and the FPS drops accordingly.

The data indicates that the CPU is not the bottleneck in this system. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K is consistent with GPU-bound behavior, and the CPU's high benchmark scores relative to the GPU's suggest that there is headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The Ryzen 7 5700G is a strong pairing for the RTX 5050, but it is capable of driving a faster GPU if the user chooses to upgrade in the future.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Doom?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the best resolution for high frame rates, with the High preset averaging 149 FPS. 2560x1440 is also viable, with the High preset at 96 FPS, but 3840x2160 is not recommended for high settings, as the Ultra preset only averages 43 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G has an average benchmark score of 27051, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i9-9900K's score of 27097. This indicates the two CPUs are nearly identical in performance.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor in this system?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's percentile rank of 79 is higher than the GPU's rank of 66, and the FPS drops significantly with resolution, which is a sign of a GPU bottleneck.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 131 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 79 FPS. This is a difference of 52 FPS, giving players a significant range to adjust visual quality.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?

A: The data shows that 4K gaming is possible but limited. The Low preset averages 71 FPS, which is playable, but the Ultra preset only averages 43 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the GPU's performance rank against other GPUs?

A: The RTX 5050 has a Passmark G3D score of 17326, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, scores 1.6% higher, showing the RTX 5050 is a mid-range part.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p gaming, the High preset is the best balance of visual quality and performance, averaging 149 FPS. The Ultra preset at 122 FPS is also playable and offers the best visuals, but the 27 FPS difference between High and Ultra may not be worth the graphical gain for competitive players. The Medium preset at 176 FPS is a good choice for those who prioritize high refresh rates, as it offers a significant FPS boost over High.

At 1440p, the High preset is the recommended choice, averaging 96 FPS. This provides a good balance between visual fidelity and smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 114 FPS is also viable for those who want a higher frame rate, but the visual difference between Medium and High is noticeable. The Ultra preset at 79 FPS is playable but may not be ideal for fast-paced action, as the frame rate is lower.

For 4K gaming, the Low preset is the only viable option for a smooth experience, averaging 71 FPS. The Medium preset at 62 FPS is borderline, and the High and Ultra presets are not recommended due to their low frame rates. The data shows that this combo is not designed for 4K gaming, and users should stick to 1080p or 1440p for the best experience.

The measured data suggests that the High preset is the sweet spot for this combo. It offers a good balance of visual quality and performance across all resolutions, with the exception of 4K where it is too demanding. For those who want to maximize frame rates, the Low preset provides the highest FPS, but the visual trade-off may be too steep for some players. The Medium preset is a good compromise, offering a solid middle ground.