Control

# Control with AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 delivers a compelling 1080p and 1440p experience in Control, though 4K pushes the GPU to its limits. With 8 cores and 16 threads from the Zen 3 architecture, the CPU provides solid foundation for this action-adventure title, while the RTX 5050's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and Blackwell 2.0 architecture handle the game's visual effects. The measured FPS data reveals a system that is clearly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, with the CPU's capabilities becoming less relevant as pixel count increases.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and tells a clear story about which component becomes the bottleneck. At High settings, the system delivers 78 FPS at 1920x1080, drops to 59 FPS at 2560x1440, and falls to 40 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 49% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K at High settings, with the most significant single-step decline occurring between 1440p and 4K (a 32% drop from 59 to 40 FPS).

The scaling pattern suggests that at 1080p, the CPU still has some influence on performance, but by 1440p and especially 4K, the RTX 5050 becomes the dominant limiting factor. Looking at Low settings, the progression is 124 FPS at 1080p, 94 FPS at 1440p, and 63 FPS at 4K — again showing a steep 33% decline from 1440p to 4K. The Medium preset follows a similar trajectory: 88 FPS at 1080p, 67 FPS at 1440p, and 45 FPS at 4K. Ultra settings show the most constrained performance, with 68 FPS at 1080p, 52 FPS at 1440p, and just 35 FPS at 4K.

The data implies that the RTX 5050's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus (providing 320.0 GB/s bandwidth) are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the GPU's compute resources — 2560 shading units and 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 — struggle to maintain playable frame rates at 4K with this game's demanding visual effects. The percentage differences between resolutions remain consistent across settings, indicating that the scaling bottleneck is resolution-driven rather than settings-driven.

Settings Recommendations

At 1920x1080, the data shows that all four settings presets deliver playable frame rates, but the choice depends on whether the user prioritizes visual fidelity or smoothness. Ultra settings provide 68 FPS average, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while High settings offer 78 FPS — a 15% improvement over Ultra with presumably minimal visual compromise. Medium settings reach 88 FPS, and Low settings hit 124 FPS, making Low the best choice for high-refresh-rate displays.

For 2560x1440, the recommendation becomes more nuanced. Ultra settings drop to 52 FPS, which may be acceptable for slower-paced exploration but could feel less responsive during combat sequences. High settings at 59 FPS nearly hit the 60 FPS target, while Medium settings at 67 FPS comfortably exceed it. Low settings at 94 FPS provide the smoothest experience. The data suggests that High is the optimal preset at 1440p, offering the best balance between visual quality and frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Ultra settings average only 35 FPS, which is below the threshold for comfortable gameplay. High settings at 40 FPS are marginally better but still sub-60. Medium settings at 45 FPS with a minimum of 38 FPS show that even the mid-range preset struggles at 4K. Only Low settings at 63 FPS achieve playable performance, and even then, the visual compromises are significant. For 4K gaming, the data indicates that users should either accept Low settings or consider lowering the resolution to 1440p.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is a Zen 3 architecture processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, running at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its 16 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support (providing 51.2 GB/s bandwidth) are typical for a desktop processor of this class. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves a 3dmark single-thread score of 899 and a 3dmark 16-thread score of 6629, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12830.5 and single-core score of 1494.

In Control, the CPU's role appears to diminish as resolution increases. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 124 FPS, which suggests that the CPU can keep up with the GPU's output at lower graphical loads. However, at 4K, even Low settings only reach 63 FPS, indicating that the GPU is the primary constraint. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs (with an average benchmark score of 27051) places it slightly below the Intel Core i9-9900K (27097, -0.2% delta) and above the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (26936, +0.4% delta).

The 5700G's 8-core/16-thread configuration is well-suited for Control, which is not particularly CPU-intensive. The game's physics and AI systems can utilize multiple threads, but the data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is not the limiting factor — the FPS scales more with GPU settings than with resolution changes. The processor's PassMark multithread score of 24419 and Geekbench multicore score of 9950 indicate solid multi-threaded performance that should handle any background tasks while gaming.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database for Control, this CPU+GPU combination ranks 1756 out of 2888 tested combos, placing it in approximately the 39th percentile of all systems tested. This ranking reflects the mid-range positioning of both components — the RTX 5050 sits at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 7 5700G sits at the 79th percentile among all CPUs.

The GPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance. The RTX 5050's average benchmark score of 21035 places it slightly below the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153, -0.6% delta) and the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237, -1% delta), while being slightly above the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713, +1.6% delta). This suggests the RTX 5050 performs in a similar tier to these older but capable graphics cards.

The combo ranking of 1756 out of 2888 indicates that while this system is not a top-tier performer, it is far from the bottom. The data shows that the combination is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Control, with the CPU providing enough headroom for the GPU to operate effectively. The ranking also implies that users with this combo are getting a system that outperforms a significant portion of the tested configurations, particularly those with older or lower-end hardware.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 149 mm² containing 16,900 million transistors. Its base clock of 2317 MHz and boost clock of 2572 MHz drive 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The GPU features 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS features, though the measured FPS data does not specify whether these features were enabled.

The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for Control at 1080p and 1440p but becomes a constraint at 4K. The GPU's pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s indicate its fill-rate capabilities. With a TDP of 130 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W, the RTX 5050 is efficient for its performance class.

The data shows that the GPU's performance scales predictably with settings. At 1080p, the FPS ranges from 68 (Ultra) to 124 (Low), showing a 82% improvement from the highest to lowest settings. At 1440p, the range is 52 to 94 FPS (81% improvement), and at 4K, the range is 35 to 63 FPS (80% improvement). This consistent scaling suggests that the GPU's compute resources are the primary determinant of performance, with VRAM capacity and bandwidth playing a secondary role.

The RTX 5050's 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035, places it in the mid-range segment. Its PassMark G3D score of 17326 and 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 provide additional context for its DirectX 12 performance. The GPU's Vulkan score of 89381 and OpenCL score of 90334 indicate strong compute capabilities.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Control at 60 FPS at 1080p?*

A: Yes, at all settings presets. The measured data shows 68 FPS at Ultra, 78 FPS at High, 88 FPS at Medium, and 124 FPS at Low settings at 1920x1080.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 deliver 59 FPS average, which is nearly at the 60 FPS target. Medium settings provide 67 FPS, and Low settings reach 94 FPS, so users should choose between High for visual quality or Medium for a smoother experience.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this combination?

A: Only at Low settings, which averages 63 FPS at 3840x2160. Medium settings drop to 45 FPS, High to 40 FPS, and Ultra to 35 FPS, making these presets less suitable for comfortable gameplay.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5050's average benchmark score of 21035 is 0.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153), 1% lower than the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237), and 1.6% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713).

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700G a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests no. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 124 FPS, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU effectively. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample processing power for this game.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the data?

A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 38 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 with Medium settings. All other resolutions and settings show minimums of 57 FPS or higher, though minimum FPS data is only provided for Medium settings across all resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080:

• Low: 124 FPS average
• Medium: 88 FPS average, 75 FPS minimum, 101 FPS maximum
• High: 78 FPS average
• Ultra: 68 FPS average

2560x1440:

• Low: 94 FPS average
• Medium: 67 FPS average, 57 FPS minimum, 77 FPS maximum
• High: 59 FPS average
• Ultra: 52 FPS average

3840x2160:

• Low: 63 FPS average
• Medium: 45 FPS average, 38 FPS minimum, 52 FPS maximum
• High: 40 FPS average
• Ultra: 35 FPS average

The data reveals a consistent pattern across all settings: performance degrades by approximately 20-25% when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and another 30-35% when moving from 1440p to 4K. The Medium settings preset is the only one with complete minimum and maximum FPS data, showing that frame pacing is relatively stable at 1080p (75-101 FPS range) but becomes more variable at higher resolutions (57-77 FPS at 1440p, 38-52 FPS at 4K). This variability at 4K suggests that the GPU's limited memory bandwidth (320.0 GB/s) and 8 GB VRAM capacity may cause occasional stutters during demanding scenes, particularly when textures and effects require more memory than available.