INTEL

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores

18
Cores
18
Threads
5.3
GHz Boost
125W
TDP
Unlocked Integrated GPU ECC Memory

At a Glance

Intel
Cores / Threads 18C / 18T
Boost Clock 5.3 GHz
Base Clock 4.2 GHz
L3 Cache 30 MB (shared)
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
nm
Process 3 nm
Released Mar 2026

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus Specifications

Core Ultra 5 250K Plus Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus features 18 physical cores and 18 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
18
Threads
18
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 12
SMP CPUs
1

Ultra 5 250K Plus Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in Core Ultra 5 250K Plus benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
4.2 GHz
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz
E-Core Frequency
3.3 GHz up to 4.6 GHz
Multiplier
42x (Unlocked)

Intel's Core Ultra 5 250K Plus Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Ultra 5 250K Plus processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
30 MB (shared)

Intel Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is built on Intel's 3 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Ultra 5 250K Plus incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Codename
Arrow Lake Refresh
Process Node
3 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
17,800 million
Die Size
243 mm²
Generation
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)

Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 125W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
125W
PL1 (Base Power)
159 W
PL2 (Turbo Power)
159 W
Tj Max
105°C

Intel Socket 1851 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
Intel Socket 1851
Chipsets
Z890, B860, W880, Q870, H810
PCIe
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Package
FC-LGA18W
DDR5

Intel Socket 1851 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the Ultra 5 250K Plus define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
115.2 GB/s
ECC Memory
Supported

Intel's Core Ultra 5 250K Plus Integrated Graphics

Built-in GPU specifications

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the Ultra 5 250K Plus provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.

iGPU
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Graphics Model
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Product Information

Release and pricing details

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.

Manufacturer
Intel
Release Date
Mar 2026
Launch Price
$199
Market
Desktop
Status
Active
Part Number
SA4UZ

About Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on a 3 nm TSMC process with 18 cores and 18 threads. Its benchmark results place it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 66,855, indicating strong overall performance for a mainstream desktop part.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus delivers a multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 30,867 points, which is a substantial figure for a processor in its class. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score reaches 18,442 points, while the older R15 test yields 4,640 points. These results demonstrate a consistent scaling across different versions of the rendering workload, with the processor maintaining a strong output as the test complexity increases.

Single-core performance is equally notable, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,261 points and an R20 score of 2,603 points. The R15 single-core result is 328 points. These figures suggest that the processor is capable of handling lightly-threaded tasks with high efficiency, which is critical for everyday responsiveness and gaming performance.

In PassMark testing, the processor scores 51,596 in the multithread benchmark and 4,757 in single-thread performance. The data compression test shows a score of 568,721, while data encryption achieves 42,144. Extended instructions score 44,565, and the floating-point math test reaches 162,692. Integer math performance is recorded at 125,091, and the prime number finding test scores 486. The random string sorting benchmark completes with a score of 69,090, and physics simulation scores 3,494.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 250K Plus shows a very tight competitive landscape. The AMD EPYC 4465P has an average score of 66,925, which is 0.1% higher than the 250K Plus, making the difference effectively negligible in real-world terms. The Intel Xeon 6515P scores 67,006, a 0.2% advantage. The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, a mobile part, scores 67,469, which is 0.9% higher. The only rival that the 250K Plus beats is the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, which scores 66,159, a 1.1% deficit. This grouping indicates that the 250K Plus sits in a highly competitive performance band where the differences between products are within the margin of error for many applications.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The performance split between single-thread and multi-thread workloads reveals a balanced design. With 18 cores and 18 threads, the processor has no hyper-threading, meaning each core handles exactly one thread. This configuration is unusual for a high-core-count part, as many competitors use simultaneous multithreading to boost throughput. However, the benchmark scores suggest that the physical cores are efficient enough to compensate.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core to single-core ratio is approximately 13.65, which indicates strong scaling across the 18 cores. This ratio is typical for a processor with a high core count and good interconnect bandwidth. In PassMark, the multithread score of 51,596 versus the single-thread score of 4,757 yields a ratio of about 10.84, which is slightly lower but still indicates effective parallelization.

For real workloads, this means that tasks like video rendering, 3D modeling, and code compilation that can utilize all 18 cores will see near-linear performance gains. Conversely, tasks that rely on a single thread, such as legacy software or certain game engines, will benefit from the high boost clock of 5.30 GHz and the strong single-core scores. The base clock of 4.20 GHz is also relatively high, ensuring that even without boost, the processor maintains solid performance.

The data compression score of 568,721 is particularly strong, suggesting that the processor excels at tasks involving large data sets and compression algorithms. The encryption score of 42,144 is moderate, indicating that while the processor can handle encryption workloads, it is not specifically optimized for cryptographic operations compared to some server-grade parts.

Platform and Compatibility

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for the Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for users who require error correction for data integrity, such as those running unattended servers or workstations.

PCIe support is Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU. This provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern graphics cards and NVMe storage devices. The 20 lanes are sufficient for a single high-end GPU and a fast SSD, though users with multiple expansion cards may need to consider the lane allocation carefully.

The processor includes integrated graphics in the form of Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. This is a capable iGPU that can handle basic display output and light graphics workloads, though it is not intended for gaming or heavy GPU compute tasks. The production status is active, and the release date is March 10, 2026.

The socket 1851 platform offers an upgrade path within the Core Ultra Series 2 family, though the exact future compatibility beyond this generation is not specified. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking to extract additional performance, provided the user has adequate cooling and a compatible motherboard.

How It Compares

vs AMD EPYC 4465P: The EPYC 4465P holds a 0.1% higher average score, which is statistically insignificant. Both processors are effectively tied in overall performance. The EPYC is a server-oriented part, while the 250K Plus is a desktop CPU, so the choice comes down to platform features rather than raw speed.

vs Intel Xeon 6515P: The Xeon 6515P is 0.2% faster on average. This is a marginal difference that would be imperceptible in most workloads. The Xeon targets professional server environments with different memory and expansion capabilities, while the 250K Plus offers a more consumer-friendly platform with integrated graphics.

vs Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: The 275HX, a mobile processor, outperforms the 250K Plus by 0.9%. This is a surprising result given that the 275HX is designed for laptops and likely has a lower power envelope. The gap is small but consistent, indicating that high-end mobile parts have caught up to desktop counterparts in certain metrics.

vs Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus: The 250KF Plus is the only rival that the 250K Plus beats, with a 1.1% advantage. The "KF" variant likely lacks integrated graphics, making the "K Plus" version slightly more capable in terms of features, though the performance difference is modest.

Power and Thermals

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has a thermal design power (TDP) of 125 watts. This places it in the mid-range for high-performance desktop processors, requiring a capable air cooler or a modest liquid cooler to maintain optimal temperatures under load. The TDP class suggests that the processor is designed for sustained multi-core workloads without excessive power draw, though overclocking will increase heat output beyond the stock TDP.

The 3 nm process node from TSMC contributes to power efficiency, as smaller transistors typically reduce power consumption for a given performance level. The 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die indicate a dense design that balances performance and efficiency. Users with a high-quality tower air cooler or a 240mm-class liquid cooler will likely see stable operation, but those planning aggressive overclocks should consider higher-end cooling solutions.

The unlocked multiplier allows for voltage and frequency adjustments, which can push power consumption above the 125 W TDP. Without specific power measurements in the benchmark data, it is reasonable to assume that the processor operates within its TDP class during stock operation, with headroom for enthusiast tuning.

FAQ

Q: What is the socket type for the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus?

A: The processor uses Intel Socket 1851.

Q: Does the processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.30 GHz.

Q: How many cores and threads does the processor have?

A: It has 18 cores and 18 threads.

Q: What integrated graphics does the processor include?

A: It includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked.

Who Should Consider It

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is well-suited for users who need strong multi-threaded performance in a desktop platform. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,867 indicates that it can handle video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The PassMark multithread score of 51,596 reinforces this capability, making it a good choice for content creators who rely on heavily threaded applications.

For gamers, the single-thread performance is the key metric. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,261 and the PassMark single-thread score of 4,757 are strong, suggesting that the processor will not bottleneck modern GPUs in most gaming scenarios. The high boost clock of 5.30 GHz ensures snappy performance in games that are sensitive to single-core speed.

Office and productivity users will find the processor more than adequate for everyday tasks. The high base clock of 4.20 GHz provides responsive performance in typical office applications, while the 18 cores offer ample headroom for background tasks like antivirus scans, file indexing, and virtual machines. The integrated graphics also eliminate the need for a discrete GPU in basic office setups, reducing overall system cost and complexity.

Users who require ECC memory support will find this processor appealing, as it is a relatively uncommon feature on desktop platforms. This makes it suitable for small-scale servers or workstations where data integrity is paramount. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes also provides future-proofing for high-speed storage and graphics.

Architecture and Design

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, succeeding the original Arrow Lake design. The codename is "Arrow Lake Refresh," and it is part of the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. The processor is fabricated on a 3 nm process node by TSMC, which represents a leading-edge manufacturing technology that enables high transistor density and improved power efficiency.

The silicon contains 17,800 million transistors on a die size of 243 mm². This density is a hallmark of the 3 nm process, allowing for a complex core layout and large cache hierarchy. The cache configuration includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This hierarchy provides low-latency access to frequently used data, which is critical for both single-thread and multi-thread performance.

The core layout consists of 18 physical cores with no hyper-threading, meaning 18 threads total. This design choice prioritizes raw core performance over thread duplication, which can be beneficial for workloads that do not scale well with virtual threads. The absence of hyper-threading also simplifies power management and reduces the risk of thermal throttling in dense multi-core workloads.

The memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. This bandwidth is sufficient for the 18 cores to feed data without bottlenecks in most applications. The integrated graphics, Arc Xe-LPG with 64 EU, are based on Intel's discrete GPU architecture, providing hardware acceleration for video encoding and decoding, as well as basic 3D rendering.

The launch MSRP is $199, positioning the processor as a mainstream desktop offering. The part number is SA4UZ, and the market segment is Desktop, with an active production status. The combination of the 3 nm process, high core count, and modern platform features makes this processor a compelling option for users building a high-performance desktop system in the Core Ultra Series 2 generation.

Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus are below.

Benchmark Scores

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource

Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. The R15 version remains useful for comparing against older hardware benchmarks. Higher scores directly correlate with faster render times in Cinema 4D and similar 3D applications.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore #146 of 1967
4,640
31%
Max: 14,978

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus handles tasks that can't be parallelized across multiple cores. Games and many desktop applications still rely heavily on single-thread performance. A higher single-core score means snappier system responsiveness in everyday use.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore #312 of 1400
328
16%
Max: 2,114

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource

Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore #138 of 1786
18,442
30%
Max: 62,412
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore #133 of 1776
2,603
30%
Max: 8,811
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource

Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore #236 of 1938
30,867
21%
Max: 148,601
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore #442 of 1923
2,261
11%
Max: 20,979

passmark_data_compressionSource

Data compression measures how fast Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus can compress and decompress files. This is important for archiving, backup software, and file transfer applications. Higher scores mean faster ZIP, RAR, and backup operations.

passmark_data_compression #155 of 696
568,721
10%
Max: 5,679,990
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
5,679,990
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
4,680,013
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
4,517,407
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
3,929,890

passmark_data_encryptionSource

Data encryption tests how fast Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus can encrypt information using AES and other algorithms. This is critical for security applications, VPNs, and secure communications.

passmark_data_encryption #106 of 696
42,144
12%
Max: 348,449
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_extended_instructionsSource

Extended instructions tests Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus performance using SSE and AVX instruction sets. These specialized instructions accelerate multimedia, scientific, and AI workloads. Video encoding and image processing heavily utilize SIMD capabilities.

passmark_extended_instructions #135 of 696
44,565
12%
Max: 383,298
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
383,298
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
314,798
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
303,321
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
280,477

passmark_find_prime_numbersSource

Find prime numbers tests Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus ability to identify primes through intensive calculations. This is a pure computational benchmark that stresses CPU arithmetic units without memory bottlenecks. The test reveals raw mathematical processing capability. Higher scores indicate superior arithmetic throughput independent of memory subsystem performance.

passmark_find_prime_numbers #74 of 696
486
20%
Max: 2,422

passmark_floating_point_mathSource

Floating point math measures how Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus handles decimal calculations critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering. This affects performance in CAD and physics simulations. Game physics engines also rely heavily on floating point operations.

passmark_floating_point_math #80 of 696
162,692
14%
Max: 1,153,453
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_integer_mathSource

Integer math tests how fast Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus processes whole number calculations essential for database operations and compression algorithms. This is fundamental to general computing performance.

passmark_integer_math #201 of 696
125,091
6%
Max: 1,926,069
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,926,069
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
1,687,531
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
1,549,946
#4 AMD EPYC 9655P
1,225,251
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
1,224,315

passmark_multithreadSource

PassMark multi-thread tests Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus across integer math, floating point, compression, and encryption using all cores. This provides an overall multi-threaded CPU performance score.

passmark_multithread #119 of 696
51,596
30%
Max: 171,200
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_physicsSource

Physics tests how Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus handles physics simulations used in games and engineering software. This measures performance in calculating object interactions and movements. Games with complex physics benefit from higher scores.

passmark_physics #110 of 696
3,494
13%
Max: 27,806
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_random_string_sortingSource

Random string sorting measures how fast Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus can organize text data. This is important for database operations, search indexing, and data processing applications. Applications that process large amounts of text benefit from higher scores.

passmark_random_string_sorting #139 of 696
69,090
11%
Max: 633,030
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
633,030
#2 AMD EPYC 9755
571,185
#3 AMD EPYC 9845
538,060
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
468,975
#5 AMD EPYC 9655P
451,824

passmark_single_threadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use. Many legacy applications and games still depend heavily on single-thread speed.

passmark_singlethreadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications.

The AMD Equivalent of Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.

AMD Ryzen 5 3501U

AMD • 4 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus Comparisons

See how the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs