AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for the AMD Ryzen 5 130 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has 18 cores and 18 threads.

Q: How do their boost clocks compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 boosts up to 4.55 GHz, whereas the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus boosts up to 5.30 GHz.

Q: What are the power envelopes for these two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has a TDP of 125 watts.

Q: Which processor offers higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus offers memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 130's 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 130 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus support ECC memory.

Q: What is the production status of each processor?

A: Both processors have an Active production status. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 was released on 2025-09-30, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus was released on 2026-03-10.

The Verdict

The data indicates a complete performance separation between these two processors. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus holds a 93rd percentile ranking across all CPUs, with a 66855 average benchmark score, while the AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no recorded benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking. The Intel part delivers 18 cores and 18 threads with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, and the recorded benchmarks confirm its position among high-end desktop parts. The AMD Ryzen 5 130, by contrast, is a mobile-class chip with 6 cores and 12 threads, a 4.55 GHz boost clock, and a 28-watt TDP. The 125-watt Intel processor is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark data, and that data places it in the top tier of the database. The AMD processor has no benchmark entries, so any direct comparison of measured performance must rely solely on the Intel side of the ledger.

Pick the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus for any workload that depends on raw multi-threaded throughput, high-frequency single-thread performance, or extensive I/O capability. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 suits scenarios where power draw is the limiting factor, given its 28-watt TDP, or where a compact mobile platform is mandatory. The benchmark record shows no contest in performance terms, but the two parts target different physical and thermal envelopes, so the correct choice depends on the platform constraints rather than on measured speed alone.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Because the AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no recorded benchmarks, the head-to-head comparison is defined entirely by the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus's measured results. The Intel part scores 30867 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 18442 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 4640 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. Single-core results are equally strong: 2261 in Cinebench R23, 2603 in Cinebench R20, and 328 in Cinebench R15. These numbers establish a performance baseline that the AMD processor cannot challenge in the database, since it has no scores to compare.

The Passmark suite reinforces the Intel processor's position. Its multithread score is 51596, single-thread is 4757, integer math is 125091, floating-point math is 162692, and extended instructions score is 44565. Data compression reaches 568721, data encryption reaches 42144, random string sorting reaches 69090, and find prime numbers scores 486. Physics tests score 3494. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus also ranks against close rivals: it sits 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 4465P, 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 6515P, 0.9% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus. These deltas show the 250K Plus operating in a tight band of very similar high-end processors, rather than as an outlier in either direction.

The AMD Ryzen 5 130, with no benchmark entries, cannot be positioned against these scores. The database records zero wins for the AMD processor and zero wins for the Intel processor in the head-to-head field, which in practice means the Intel part carries all available measured performance data. The single-core and multi-core Cinebench figures, alongside the breadth of Passmark tests, give a full picture of what the Intel processor can do. The AMD processor's capabilities can only be inferred from its specifications, not from any measured result.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses 6 cores and 12 threads; the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus uses 18 cores and 18 threads. Base clocks differ substantially: 2.90 GHz for the AMD part versus 4.20 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks follow the same pattern, with the Intel processor reaching 5.30 GHz against the AMD processor's 4.55 GHz. TDP is the largest single gap: 28 watts for the AMD processor versus 125 watts for the Intel processor.

Cache configurations are not comparable in size. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. Memory bandwidth also favors the Intel part, at 115.2 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, though both use dual-channel DDR5 and both support ECC memory. PCIe generation and lane counts differ, with the AMD processor using Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes and the Intel processor using Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. The Intel processor has an unlocked multiplier; the AMD processor does not.

The market segments are different. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1851. The AMD part is built on a 6 nm process with a 210 mm² die size, while the Intel part uses a 3 nm process with a 243 mm² die size and 17,800 million transistors. Release dates differ by about five months, with the AMD part dated 2025-09-30 and the Intel part dated 2026-03-10. The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $199. The AMD processor has no launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architecture families. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, part of the Ryzen 5 generation built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, codenamed Arrow Lake Refresh, part of the Ultra 5 generation built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. The manufacturing process difference is significant: 6 nm versus 3 nm, which directly affects transistor density and power behavior.

The cache hierarchy is built differently. The AMD processor allocates 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a 16 MB shared L3 pool. The Intel processor allocates 192 KB of L1 per core and 3 MB of L2 per core, with a 30 MB shared L3 pool. The Intel part also carries 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, whereas the AMD part's transistor count is not recorded but its die is 210 mm². These figures indicate that the Intel processor dedicates substantially more silicon to cache and core resources.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 includes a Radeon 660M, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. Both processors support DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. The PCIe interface differs by generation, with the AMD processor on Gen 4 and the Intel processor on Gen 5, both with 20 CPU lanes. The Intel processor's unlocked multiplier and desktop socket indicate a design aimed at overclocking and high-power operation, while the AMD processor's mobile socket and 28-watt TDP indicate a power-constrained design.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus wins every category that has recorded data. Its 18 cores and 18 threads, 5.30 GHz boost clock, 30 MB of shared L3, and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth give it decisive advantages in multi-threaded rendering, data compression, encryption, and math workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30867 and the Passmark multithread score of 51596 confirm that heavily parallel tasks are its domain. Its 0.1% gap to the AMD EPYC 4465P and 0.9% gap to the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX place it in the same performance class as those server and high-end mobile parts, while its 1.1% lead over the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus shows it is the stronger of the two 250K variants.

The AMD Ryzen 5 130 wins on power efficiency and platform form factor. Its 28-watt TDP is less than a quarter of the Intel processor's 125-watt TDP, and its mobile socket makes it suitable for systems where the Intel desktop part cannot physically fit. The AMD processor's 6 nm process and 210 mm² die size point to a design optimized for low power draw rather than peak throughput. Its Radeon 660M integrated graphics and Gen 4 PCIe support are adequate for mobile duties, but none of its specifications suggest it can compete with the Intel processor in measured performance.

The workload split is therefore clear. Multi-threaded rendering, heavy math, encryption, and data processing belong to the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. Power-constrained mobile builds belong to the AMD Ryzen 5 130. The database contains no benchmark evidence that the AMD processor wins any performance test, so any use case that prioritizes speed must select the Intel part.