AMD

AMD EPYC 9845

AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores

160
Cores
320
Threads
3.7
GHz Boost
390W
TDP
ECC Memory

At a Glance

AMD
Cores / Threads 160C / 320T
Boost Clock 3.7 GHz
Base Clock 2.1 GHz
L3 Cache 320 MB (shared)
TDP 390W
Architecture Zen 5
Socket AMD Socket SP5
nm
Process 3 nm
Released Oct 2024

AMD EPYC 9845 Specifications

EPYC 9845 Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The AMD EPYC 9845 features 160 physical cores and 320 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
160
Threads
320
SMP CPUs
2

EPYC 9845 Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in EPYC 9845 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The EPYC 9845 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
2.1 GHz
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
Multiplier
21x

AMD's EPYC 9845 Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the EPYC 9845 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The EPYC 9845's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
320 MB (shared)

Zen 5 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The AMD EPYC 9845 is built on AMD's 3 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in EPYC 9845 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Zen 5
Codename
Turin
Process Node
3 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5c (Turin))

Zen 5 Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The EPYC 9845 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
AVX-512
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2

Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The AMD EPYC 9845 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 390W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
390W
Configurable TDP
320-400 W

AMD Socket SP5 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The EPYC 9845 uses the AMD Socket SP5 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
AMD Socket SP5
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Package
FC-LGA6096
DDR5

AMD Socket SP5 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the EPYC 9845 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the EPYC 9845 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Supported

Product Information

Release and pricing details

The AMD EPYC 9845 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the EPYC 9845 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Oct 2024
Launch Price
$13564
Market
Server/Workstation
Status
Active
Part Number
100-000001458

About AMD EPYC 9845

The AMD EPYC 9845 is a 160-core, 320-thread server processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Turin, and manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It sits in the EPYC 9005 series, targeting the highest-density compute tiers of the server and workstation market. With a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.70 GHz, the data positions this part as a massive parallel throughput engine rather than a frequency-optimized performer, a characterization confirmed by its benchmark results.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The single-thread scores for the EPYC 9845 are respectable but clearly secondary to its multi-thread capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 18358, while the multi-core score reaches 130037. That represents a roughly 7x scaling factor from one core to all 160 cores, which is typical for a dense server part where the focus is on aggregate throughput. The PassMark single-thread score of 3144 further illustrates that per-core performance, while not weak, is not the defining trait of this processor.

The multi-thread results are where the processor distinguishes itself. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 54615 and the R15 multi-core score of 13107 show a consistent pattern: the EPYC 9845 is engineered to dominate heavily parallel workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 152985 reinforces this, with integer math scoring 1687531 and floating-point math scoring 978377. For real workloads, this split means the EPYC 9845 excels in rendering, scientific simulation, data processing, and any task that can utilize dozens or hundreds of threads. Conversely, lightly threaded applications—such as legacy single-core software or basic office tasks—will not see the same proportional benefit, though the Zen 5 architecture ensures they remain adequately responsive.

Data compression and encryption scores from PassMark highlight the processor's strength in data-centric tasks. The data compression score of 4680013 is exceptionally high, while data encryption scores 296808, indicating robust capabilities for database and security workloads. The extended instructions score of 314798 suggests strong performance in vectorized and SIMD-heavy code, which is common in modern scientific and financial computing.

Power and Thermals

The EPYC 9845 carries a TDP of 390 watts, placing it firmly in the high-power, high-performance class of server processors. This TDP level implies that the processor requires a serious cooling solution—likely a high-end air cooler or a liquid cooling system designed for dense server chassis. The data does not specify thermal dissipation beyond the TDP, but the 390-watt figure dictates that system integrators must plan for substantial heat removal to sustain boost clocks under sustained load.

The 3 nm process node from TSMC helps mitigate some of the thermal challenges, as the manufacturing technology is designed for efficiency relative to older nodes. However, 160 active cores drawing power under full load will generate significant heat. The base clock of 2.10 GHz is modest, which suggests the processor is designed to maintain a consistent power envelope across all cores rather than aggressively boosting a few. The boost clock of 3.70 GHz is available for lighter, bursty workloads, but sustained all-core operation will likely settle near the base clock depending on cooling and power delivery limits.

For a typical server deployment, this TDP class means dual-socket systems or high-end single-socket workstations must have robust power delivery and cooling infrastructure. The data shows no unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a consideration; the processor operates within its specified power and thermal limits.

Benchmark Performance

Benchmark results indicate that the EPYC 9845 sits at the absolute top of the CPU hierarchy, with a percentile rank of 100 among all tested CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 523613, a figure that places it ahead of most rivals but with notable caveats. Compared to the AMD EPYC 9755, the EPYC 9845 is 3.5% faster on average, a modest lead that reflects the 9755's similar architecture and core count. Against the EPYC 9745, the lead expands to 22.9%, showing a significant generational or core-count advantage.

The comparison to the EPYC 9965 is more complex. The 9965 scores 12% higher on average, meaning the EPYC 9845 is not the absolute fastest in the EPYC 9005 lineup. The 9965 likely benefits from higher clocks or a different core configuration, but the data only provides average scores, not per-test breakdowns. In single-thread tests, the EPYC 9845 scores 18358 in Cinebench R23, which is strong for a 160-core part, but the 9965's advantage suggests it may have a higher boost clock or better single-core tuning.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX, a workstation-focused competitor, scores 28.8% lower on average than the EPYC 9845. This gap underlines the EPYC's server-oriented design: it trades some per-core performance and platform features for sheer core count and memory bandwidth. In PassMark tests, the EPYC 9845's physics score of 19631 and random string sorting score of 538060 indicate strong performance in structured workloads, while the find prime numbers score of 1255 is relatively low, suggesting that some integer-heavy single-thread tasks are not its forte.

Who Should Consider It

The EPYC 9845 is for workloads that scale with core count and memory bandwidth. Organizations running large-scale virtualization, where dozens of virtual machines share the physical processor, will benefit from the 160 cores and 320 threads. High-performance computing (HPC) applications—such as weather modeling, molecular dynamics, and finite element analysis—are ideal candidates, as these workloads typically parallelize across hundreds of threads. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and twelve-channel DDR5 support mean that memory-bound applications, like large in-memory databases or real-time analytics, will see substantial gains.

For content creation, the EPYC 9845 is a niche choice. Video rendering and 3D animation can leverage the multi-core scores, but the single-thread performance, while adequate, is not class-leading. Gamers should not consider this processor; the single-thread score of 3144 in PassMark is far below what consumer-focused parts offer, and the 390-watt TDP is impractical for desktop use. Office productivity suites, which are largely single-threaded, will run fine but will not use the processor's full potential.

The data suggests the EPYC 9845 is best suited for server racks and professional workstations where throughput is the primary metric. If a workload is embarrassingly parallel and can utilize 320 threads, this processor delivers near-top-tier performance. If a workload is latency-sensitive or lightly threaded, lower-core-count parts from the same or older generations would be more cost-effective, though pricing is not analyzed here.

Platform and Compatibility

The EPYC 9845 uses the AMD Socket SP5 platform, which is the standard for the EPYC 9005 series. It supports DDR5 memory across a twelve-channel bus, providing a theoretical memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, which is critical for feeding 160 cores. ECC memory is supported, ensuring data integrity for server environments where corruption is unacceptable. The processor provides 128 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-speed connectivity for NVMe storage, GPUs, and network adapters.

The platform supports a 3 nm process and the Zen 5c architecture, which is a dense variant of Zen 5 optimized for core count rather than clock speed. The upgrade path is defined by the SP5 socket: systems built for EPYC 9005 processors can potentially accommodate other parts in the same series, but the data does not specify cross-generation compatibility. The processor has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output, though this is standard for server parts.

The launch MSRP is $13564, positioning it in the high end of the server market. The production status is active, and the release date is October 9, 2024. The part number is 100-000001458, and the multiplier is locked, meaning no user overclocking. For system builders, the platform requires a motherboard with SP5 socket support, twelve-channel memory traces, and adequate power delivery for the 390-watt TDP.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the AMD EPYC 9845 have?

A: The EPYC 9845 has 160 cores and 320 threads, based on the Zen 5c architecture.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the EPYC 9845?

A: The boost clock is 3.70 GHz, while the base clock is 2.10 GHz.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the EPYC 9845 support?

A: It supports DDR5 memory across a twelve-channel bus, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: How does the EPYC 9845 compare to the EPYC 9965 in performance?

A: The EPYC 9965 scores 12% higher on average, meaning the 9845 is not the fastest in its series but remains in the top percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Does the EPYC 9845 have integrated graphics?

A: No, the EPYC 9845 has no integrated graphics; a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the TDP of the EPYC 9845?

A: The thermal design power is 390 watts, requiring a high-end cooling solution suitable for dense server systems.

Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the AMD EPYC 9845 are below.

Benchmark Scores

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource

Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how AMD EPYC 9845 performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. Higher scores mean faster render times in professional applications.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore #8 of 1967
13,107
88%
Max: 14,978
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how AMD EPYC 9845 handles tasks that can't be parallelized across multiple cores. Games and many desktop applications still rely heavily on single-thread performance.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore #8 of 1400
1,850
88%
Max: 2,114

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource

Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on AMD EPYC 9845.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore #8 of 1786
54,615
88%
Max: 62,412
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of AMD EPYC 9845.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore #8 of 1776
7,710
88%
Max: 8,811

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource

Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of AMD EPYC 9845 after thermal limits kick in.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore #8 of 1938
130,037
88%
Max: 148,601
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how AMD EPYC 9845 maintains boost clocks under continuous load.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore #8 of 1923
18,358
88%
Max: 20,979
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_data_compressionSource

Data compression measures how fast AMD EPYC 9845 can compress and decompress files. This is important for archiving, backup software, and file transfer applications.

passmark_data_compression #2 of 696
4,680,013
82%
Max: 5,679,990
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
5,679,990
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
4,680,013
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
4,517,407
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
3,929,890

Nearby Performers

passmark_data_encryptionSource

Data encryption tests how fast AMD EPYC 9845 can encrypt information using AES and other algorithms. This is critical for security applications, VPNs, and secure communications. Modern CPUs with AES-NI hardware acceleration score significantly higher. Disk encryption, secure browsing, and VPN performance all benefit from faster encryption.

passmark_data_encryption #2 of 696
296,808
85%
Max: 348,449
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
348,449
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
296,808
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
284,927
#4 AMD EPYC 9754
231,891
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
229,447

Nearby Performers

passmark_extended_instructionsSource

Extended instructions tests AMD EPYC 9845 performance using SSE and AVX instruction sets. These specialized instructions accelerate multimedia, scientific, and AI workloads.

passmark_extended_instructions #2 of 696
314,798
82%
Max: 383,298
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
383,298
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
314,798
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
303,321
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
280,477

passmark_find_prime_numbersSource

Find prime numbers tests AMD EPYC 9845 ability to identify primes through intensive calculations. This is a pure computational benchmark that stresses CPU arithmetic units without memory bottlenecks. The test reveals raw mathematical processing capability.

passmark_find_prime_numbers #12 of 696
1,255
52%
Max: 2,422
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_floating_point_mathSource

Floating point math measures how AMD EPYC 9845 handles decimal calculations critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering. This affects performance in CAD and physics simulations.

passmark_floating_point_math #2 of 696
978,377
85%
Max: 1,153,453
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,153,453
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
978,377
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
922,900
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
761,219

Nearby Performers

passmark_integer_mathSource

Integer math tests how fast AMD EPYC 9845 processes whole number calculations essential for database operations and compression algorithms. This is fundamental to general computing performance. Encryption and data processing heavily rely on integer operations. Higher scores benefit applications that work primarily with non-decimal numbers.

passmark_integer_math #2 of 696
1,687,531
88%
Max: 1,926,069
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,926,069
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
1,687,531
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
1,549,946
#4 AMD EPYC 9655P
1,225,251
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
1,224,315

Nearby Performers

passmark_multithreadSource

PassMark multi-thread tests AMD EPYC 9845 across integer math, floating point, compression, and encryption using all cores. This provides an overall multi-threaded CPU performance score. The combined result reflects general-purpose parallel computing capability. Results can be compared against millions of submissions in the PassMark database.

passmark_multithread #6 of 696
152,985
89%
Max: 171,200
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_physicsSource

Physics tests how AMD EPYC 9845 handles physics simulations used in games and engineering software. This measures performance in calculating object interactions and movements.

passmark_physics #7 of 696
19,631
71%
Max: 27,806
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9755
27,806
#2 AMD EPYC 9655
25,947
#3 AMD EPYC 9655P
25,847
#4 Intel Xeon 6960P
24,937
#5 AMD EPYC 9684X
24,686

passmark_random_string_sortingSource

Random string sorting measures how fast AMD EPYC 9845 can organize text data. This is important for database operations, search indexing, and data processing applications.

passmark_random_string_sorting #3 of 696
538,060
85%
Max: 633,030
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
633,030
#2 AMD EPYC 9755
571,185
#3 AMD EPYC 9845
538,060
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
468,975
#5 AMD EPYC 9655P
451,824

passmark_single_threadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 9845 across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use.

passmark_single_thread #498 of 696
3,144
62%
Max: 5,087

passmark_singlethreadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 9845 across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use. Many legacy applications and games still depend heavily on single-thread speed.

passmark_singlethread #498 of 696
3,144
62%
Max: 5,087

Compare with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs