AMD EPYC 9755
AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD EPYC 9755 Specifications
EPYC 9755 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The AMD EPYC 9755 features 128 physical cores and 256 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
EPYC 9755 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in EPYC 9755 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The EPYC 9755 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
AMD's EPYC 9755 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the EPYC 9755 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The EPYC 9755's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Zen 5 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD EPYC 9755 is built on AMD's 4 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in EPYC 9755 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Zen 5 Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The EPYC 9755 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The AMD EPYC 9755 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 500W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
AMD Socket SP5 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The EPYC 9755 uses the AMD Socket SP5 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
AMD Socket SP5 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the EPYC 9755 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the EPYC 9755 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD EPYC 9755 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the EPYC 9755 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.
About AMD EPYC 9755
The AMD EPYC 9755 is a 128-core, 256-thread server processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Turin, and manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node. It is designed for the highest-density server and workstation workloads, holding a 100th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the benchmark database, which places it at the very top of the performance hierarchy.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmark data for the EPYC 9755 shows a processor that dominates in multi-threaded scenarios while maintaining competitive single-thread performance. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 141,378 points, while the single-core score is 19,959. The ratio between these scores—roughly 7.1x—indicates the scaling efficiency of the 128-core design, though it also highlights the inherent limits of multi-core scaling in this workload.
The Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern, with a multi-core score of 59,378 and a single-core score of 8,382. The Cinebench R15 results show 14,250 in multi-core and 2,011 in single-core. Across all three Cinebench versions, the single-core scores are remarkably high for a server part, suggesting that the Zen 5 architecture delivers strong instruction-level parallelism and high clock speeds even with 128 cores active.
PassMark results provide a broader view of workload-specific performance. The multithread score is 166,328, while the single-thread score is 3,503. In data compression, the score is 4,517,407, and in data encryption, it is 284,927. Extended instructions score 303,321, floating-point math scores 922,900, and integer math scores 1,549,946. The find prime numbers test, which is often memory-latency sensitive, scores 2,047. The physics test scores 27,806, and random string sorting scores 571,185.
The average benchmark score across all tests is 505,778. Against its nearest rivals, the EPYC 9755 sits in a tight competitive cluster. It trails the AMD EPYC 9965 by 15%, with the 9965 achieving an average score of 595,264. It also trails the AMD EPYC 9845 by 3.4%, which scores 523,613. However, it leads the AMD EPYC 9745 by 18.7% (425,973) and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX by 24.5% (406,395). This positioning means the EPYC 9755 is not the absolute fastest in its immediate family, but it is significantly ahead of lower-core-count siblings and the flagship Threadripper PRO.
Platform and Compatibility
The EPYC 9755 uses the AMD Socket SP5 platform, which is the enterprise socket for AMD's latest EPYC generations. The processor is based on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Turin, placing it in the EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin)) generation. The package consists of 16 chiplets, each with a die size of 70.6 mm², totaling 133,040 million transistors on the 4 nm TSMC process.
Memory support is DDR5 with a twelve-channel memory bus. The theoretical memory bandwidth is 576.0 GB/s, which is essential for feeding the 128 cores. ECC memory is supported, which is a standard requirement for server reliability. The processor provides 128 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU only, which allows for extensive high-speed I/O connectivity for accelerators, NVMe storage, and network interfaces.
The production status is active, with a release date of October 9, 2024. The launch MSRP is $12984. The multiplier is not unlocked, meaning the processor is not intended for overclocking; it operates at a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared L3 cache of 512 MB. This large L3 cache is critical for workloads that share data across many cores, reducing the need to access main memory.
Power and Thermals
The EPYC 9755 has a TDP of 500 watts. This is a very high power envelope, categorizing the processor in the top tier of air-coolable server parts, though it will require robust cooling solutions. The data does not specify a cooler type, but the 500 W TDP class implies that standard low-profile server heatsinks will be insufficient; high-performance air coolers or liquid cooling are necessary to maintain sustained boost clocks.
The 4 nm process node helps mitigate power density, but with 128 cores operating at a 4.10 GHz boost clock, the thermal load is significant. The 500 W TDP also dictates power supply requirements and chassis airflow design. In a dual-socket configuration, the combined thermal output would be substantial, requiring careful data center planning. The high TDP is a trade-off for the extreme core count and the 512 MB L3 cache, which itself consumes power to maintain.
How It Compares
vs. AMD EPYC 9845: The EPYC 9755 trails the 9845 by 3.4% in average benchmark score. This is a narrow margin, indicating that the 9845, which has a lower core count, achieves better per-core performance or higher sustained clocks in the benchmark suite. The 9755's advantage in core count does not fully translate to a lead in these specific tests, suggesting that the 9845 may have a higher boost clock or better memory latency characteristics.
vs. AMD EPYC 9745: The EPYC 9755 leads the 9745 by 18.7%. This is a substantial gap that reflects the core count difference, as the 9745 is a lower-tier part in the same Turin family. The 18.7% advantage is consistent with the scaling expected from additional cores, though the 9755 also likely benefits from higher cache capacity.
vs. AMD EPYC 9965: The EPYC 9755 trails the 9965 by 15%. The 9965 is the top performer in this rival group, and the 15% deficit is significant. This suggests that the 9965 either has a higher core count, higher clocks, or better memory bandwidth utilization. The 9755 is positioned below the flagship in the same generation.
vs. AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX: The EPYC 9755 leads this workstation processor by 24.5%. The Threadripper PRO 9995WX is a high-end desktop part, but the EPYC 9755's server-oriented design with more cores and memory channels provides a clear performance advantage in the multi-threaded benchmarks that dominate the average score.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The split between single-thread and multi-thread performance reveals the EPYC 9755's dual personality. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score of 19,959 is high in absolute terms, but the multi-core score of 141,378 shows that the processor scales to roughly 7.1 times the single-core performance. This scaling factor is below the theoretical 128x maximum, which is expected due to memory bandwidth limits and thread synchronization overheads.
The PassMark single-thread score of 3,503 is competitive with high-end desktop processors, indicating that the Zen 5 cores are not compromised for the sake of core count. The base clock of 2.70 GHz with a boost of 4.10 GHz allows for strong single-thread responsiveness when few threads are active.
For real workloads, this means the EPYC 9755 excels in tasks that can utilize many threads, such as virtualization, large-scale data processing, and scientific simulations. The data compression score of 4,517,407 and integer math score of 1,549,946 are particularly strong, suggesting excellent throughput for database and analytics workloads. However, the find prime numbers score of 2,047 is relatively low, which may indicate sensitivity to memory latency in certain algorithmic patterns, despite the 512 MB L3 cache.
The single-thread performance ensures that legacy applications with limited thread parallelism still run well, but the processor's value is clearly in its multi-threaded capabilities. The 256 threads provide enormous parallelism for cloud workloads and high-performance computing, where the 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth can be saturated by many concurrent memory streams.
FAQ
Q: What is the core and thread count of the AMD EPYC 9755?
A: The EPYC 9755 has 128 cores and 256 threads.
Q: What is the launch MSRP of the EPYC 9755?
A: The launch MSRP is $12984.
Q: What memory type and bus width does the EPYC 9755 support?
A: It supports DDR5 memory with a twelve-channel memory bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported.
Q: How does the EPYC 9755 compare to the AMD EPYC 9965 in average benchmark score?
A: The EPYC 9755 trails the EPYC 9965 by 15%, with average scores of 505,778 and 595,264, respectively.
Q: What is the TDP of the EPYC 9755 and what does it imply for cooling?
A: The TDP is 500 watts, which necessitates a robust cooling solution, likely high-end air cooling or liquid cooling, to maintain performance.
Q: What is the L3 cache size on the EPYC 9755?
A: The L3 cache is 512 MB, shared across all cores.
Q: Does the EPYC 9755 have an unlocked multiplier?
A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, so the processor is not intended for overclocking.
Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the AMD EPYC 9755 are below.
Benchmark Scores
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource
Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how AMD EPYC 9755 performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. Higher scores mean faster render times in professional applications.
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how AMD EPYC 9755 handles tasks that can't be parallelized across multiple cores. Games and many desktop applications still rely heavily on single-thread performance.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource
Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on AMD EPYC 9755.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of AMD EPYC 9755.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of AMD EPYC 9755 after thermal limits kick in.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how AMD EPYC 9755 maintains boost clocks under continuous load.
passmark_data_compressionSource
Data compression measures how fast AMD EPYC 9755 can compress and decompress files. This is important for archiving, backup software, and file transfer applications.
passmark_data_encryptionSource
Data encryption tests how fast AMD EPYC 9755 can encrypt information using AES and other algorithms. This is critical for security applications, VPNs, and secure communications. Modern CPUs with AES-NI hardware acceleration score significantly higher. Disk encryption, secure browsing, and VPN performance all benefit from faster encryption.
passmark_extended_instructionsSource
Extended instructions tests AMD EPYC 9755 performance using SSE and AVX instruction sets. These specialized instructions accelerate multimedia, scientific, and AI workloads.
passmark_find_prime_numbersSource
Find prime numbers tests AMD EPYC 9755 ability to identify primes through intensive calculations. This is a pure computational benchmark that stresses CPU arithmetic units without memory bottlenecks. The test reveals raw mathematical processing capability.
passmark_floating_point_mathSource
Floating point math measures how AMD EPYC 9755 handles decimal calculations critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering. This affects performance in CAD and physics simulations.
passmark_integer_mathSource
Integer math tests how fast AMD EPYC 9755 processes whole number calculations essential for database operations and compression algorithms. This is fundamental to general computing performance. Encryption and data processing heavily rely on integer operations. Higher scores benefit applications that work primarily with non-decimal numbers.
passmark_multithreadSource
PassMark multi-thread tests AMD EPYC 9755 across integer math, floating point, compression, and encryption using all cores. This provides an overall multi-threaded CPU performance score. The combined result reflects general-purpose parallel computing capability. Results can be compared against millions of submissions in the PassMark database.
passmark_physicsSource
Physics tests how AMD EPYC 9755 handles physics simulations used in games and engineering software. This measures performance in calculating object interactions and movements.
passmark_random_string_sortingSource
Random string sorting measures how fast AMD EPYC 9755 can organize text data. This is important for database operations, search indexing, and data processing applications.
passmark_single_threadSource
PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 9755 across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use.
passmark_singlethreadSource
PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 9755 across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use. Many legacy applications and games still depend heavily on single-thread speed.
Compare with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs