AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture (Strix Halo) using TSMC's 4nm process. It operates at a 55W TDP with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost of 5.10 GHz, paired with quad-channel LPDDR5X memory (256.0 GB/s) and a Radeon 8060S integrated GPU. In the benchmark database, it holds a 96th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of 73,567, placing it among the top 4% of all processors tracked.

Benchmark Performance

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,213 points is the headline figure, while the single-core result of 6,241 demonstrates strong per-thread capability. In R20, the multi-core score is 18,569 and single-core 2,621; in R15, the corresponding numbers are 4,456 and 629. These scores cluster tightly around a set of close rivals. The data shows that the PRO 395 is 0.7% faster than the Intel Xeon 6517P (which averages 73,050 overall) and 0.7% slower than the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX (74,103). The gap widens to 2.3% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (75,265) and 2.4% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 (75,400). This near-parity with the Xeon, a server-class part, is notable given the PRO 395's 55W mobile envelope. The PassMark suite reinforces the picture: a multithread score of 52,005, a single-thread score of 4,132, integer math at 191,369, floating-point math at 120,557, data compression at 641,407, and encryption at 33,060. The compression and encryption numbers are particularly strong, suggesting heavy lifting in archival and secure-data tasks. The overall average benchmark score of 73,567 places it just below the 75,000 mark, and the 96th percentile ranking confirms that it outperforms the overwhelming majority of CPUs in the database.

Power and Thermals

With a 55W TDP, this processor is designed for high-performance mobile systems. The 4nm process node helps maintain efficiency, but the 16-core configuration and 5.10 GHz boost clock require a cooling solution capable of sustaining moderate sustained loads. The data does not include thermal measurements, but the TDP class implies that standard laptop cooling—such as a dual-fan setup or a capable vapor chamber—should suffice for most workloads. The quad-channel memory controller and integrated Radeon 8060S also contribute to overall system power draw, but the CPU's 55W envelope is the primary thermal constraint. This power class allows for thin-and-light designs that still deliver near-desktop-level multi-threaded performance, a trade-off that is rare in the mobile segment. The absence of a user-unlocked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) means overclocking is not an option, so thermal headroom is managed through the system's cooling design rather than user intervention.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The Cinebench R23 multi-thread score of 44,213 versus a single-thread score of 6,241 yields a scaling ratio of 7.1x, which is consistent with the 16-core/32-thread design. Similarly, R20 and R15 show ratios of 7.1x (18,569/2,621) and 7.1x (4,456/629), respectively. This indicates that the processor scales almost linearly across heavily threaded workloads, a trait that benefits rendering, code compilation, and scientific simulations. The single-thread score of 6,241 in R23 is strong for a mobile part, placing it near the top of the mobile segment. In PassMark, the single-thread score of 4,132 and multithread score of 52,005 show a 12.6x ratio, which reflects the same characteristic. The 64MB shared L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth help feed the cores, reducing contention in memory-intensive multi-threaded tasks. The high single-thread performance ensures that everyday applications—web browsing, office suites, and light scripting—respond quickly, while the multi-thread headroom is reserved for demanding parallel workloads. This dual nature makes the chip versatile, but its real strength lies in multi-threaded throughput.

Who Should Consider It

Based on the benchmark data, this processor is well-suited for professionals who need high multi-threaded throughput in a mobile form factor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,213 is competitive with desktop-class processors, while the single-core performance of 6,241 ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications and light coding. PassMark integer math (191,369) and floating-point math (120,557) scores indicate strong performance in data analysis and financial modeling. Data compression (641,407) and encryption (33,060) scores suggest it handles archive management and secure communications efficiently. For gaming, the integrated Radeon 8060S provides a baseline level of graphics capability, but the CPU's strength lies in CPU-bound tasks such as physics simulations (PassMark physics score of 3,311) and random string sorting (71,439). The 96th percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database, making it a top-tier choice for mobile workstations and high-end ultrabooks. However, for users who prioritize absolute single-thread performance, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is 2.4% faster in overall average score, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (non-PRO) leads by 2.3%—though those differences are small enough to be negligible in most real-world workflows. The 55W TDP also makes it a candidate for compact laptops that still need to handle 3D rendering, video editing, and software builds.

FAQ

Q: What is the TDP of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395?

A: The TDP is 55W.

Q: How many cores and threads does it have?

A: It has 16 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.10 GHz, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz.

Q: How does it compare to the Intel Xeon 6517P?

A: The PRO 395 is 0.7% faster than the Xeon 6517P in average benchmark score (73,567 vs 73,050).

Q: What memory type does it support?

A: It supports quad-channel LPDDR5X with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported.

Q: What is the process node?

A: It is built on TSMC's 4nm process.