AMD EPYC 7352

The AMD EPYC 7352 is a 24-core, 48-thread Zen 2 processor built for the AMD Socket SP3 platform, targeting the server and workstation market segment. Launched on August 6, 2019, with a launch MSRP of $1350, it remains an active production part. Based on the 7 nm TSMC process, it features a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 3.20 GHz, with 128 MB of total L3 cache. Its benchmark scores place it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it sits well above the vast majority of processors in overall capability.

How It Compares

AMD EPYC 9184X: The EPYC 7352's average benchmark score of 68118 is effectively identical to the EPYC 9184X's 68202, with a negligible delta of -0.1%. This means the two processors deliver essentially the same overall performance profile in aggregate multi-metric testing. The data indicates that for general mixed workloads, neither chip offers a meaningful edge over the other, making the choice between them dependent on platform features rather than raw benchmark averages.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX: The EPYC 7352 holds a marginal 0.4% lead over the Threadripper PRO 5955WX, which scores 67868. While this delta is small, it shows the server-oriented EPYC can keep pace with a high-end workstation part in average scores. The slight advantage suggests the EPYC's additional 8 cores over the Threadripper's 16-core configuration (based on core count data) help in multi-threaded scenarios, though the single-thread performance gap may narrow the difference in lighter workloads.

AMD EPYC 4484PX: Against the EPYC 4484PX, which averages 67822, the 7352 again posts a 0.4% higher score. This parity is notable given the generational difference; the 4484PX is a newer part, yet the 7352's higher core count (24 vs. the 4484PX's unspecified count) and larger total L3 cache appear to compensate in the averaged benchmarks. The data suggests that for throughput-oriented tasks, the older Rome architecture remains competitive.

Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX: The EPYC 7352 leads the Core Ultra 7 255HX by 1.5%, with the Intel part scoring 67102. This is the largest delta among the nearest rivals, indicating a more decisive advantage for the EPYC in this comparison. The Ultra 7 is a mobile-class processor, so the EPYC's server-grade memory bandwidth and 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes likely contribute to its higher average score, especially in data-heavy workloads that stress the memory subsystem.

Power and Thermals

The EPYC 7352 carries a TDP of 155 W, which is typical for a mid-range EPYC 7002 series part. This TDP class is well within the capabilities of standard server cooling solutions, including passive heat sinks with chassis airflow or low-profile active coolers designed for SP3 sockets. For a 24-core Zen 2 chip, 155 W indicates that sustained all-core loads will require a cooling solution that can move heat away efficiently, but it does not demand exotic liquid cooling. In a workstation chassis, a capable air cooler with a larger fin stack should handle the thermal load, though users should ensure their case has adequate intake and exhaust airflow to prevent throttling during prolonged rendering or compilation sessions. The 7 nm process node helps keep the power density manageable, but the eight-channel DDR4 memory controller and the 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes add to the overall platform power draw beyond the CPU's TDP alone.

Benchmark Performance

In Cinebench R23 multicore, the EPYC 7352 scores 34314, which is a strong result for a 24-core processor and explains its 96th percentile standing. The single-core score of 4844 in the same test shows balanced Zen 2 architecture; it is not a world-beater in lightly threaded tasks, but it is far from a bottleneck. The gap between multi-core and single-core scores—a ratio of roughly 7:1—reflects the scaling efficiency of the 24 cores, indicating the chip can effectively utilize its thread count in fully parallel workloads.

The Cinebench R20 results echo this pattern: the multicore score of 14411 is robust, while the single-core score of 2034 is adequate for everyday responsiveness. In PassMark's multithread test, the EPYC 7352 achieves 40370, which is in line with its Cinebench multicore performance, confirming consistent scaling across different benchmark suites. The PassMark integer math score of 148605 and floating point math score of 87969 further illustrate the chip's strength in compute-heavy tasks, with integer performance outpacing floating point by about 1.7 times, a typical trait for Zen 2.

Data-centric workloads show particularly strong results. The PassMark data compression score of 660712 is exceptionally high, suggesting the large 128 MB L3 cache and high memory bandwidth (204.8 GB/s) benefit compression algorithms significantly. Data encryption, at 44426, is also solid, indicating hardware support for AES instructions is working effectively. Extended instructions score 40203, which covers AVX2 and similar workloads. However, the find prime numbers score of 301 is relatively low, suggesting that the chip's single-thread latency in certain integer loops is not its strong suit. Random string sorting scores 69231, which is respectable but not class-leading.

Who Should Consider It

Server operators running virtualized environments or containerized workloads will find the 24 cores and 48 threads well-suited for hosting multiple concurrent VMs or containers. The 128 MB L3 cache and eight-channel memory bus are critical for database workloads where data residency in cache reduces latency. The EPYC 7352's high data compression and encryption scores make it a fit for storage servers handling compressed datasets or encrypted traffic.

Content creators working on large video renders or 3D scene compilations will benefit from the multicore performance, as shown by the 34314 Cinebench R23 score. The chip's ability to sustain high throughput in integer and floating point math makes it useful for physics simulations and engineering analysis. However, the single-thread performance in Cinebench R23 (4844) is moderate, so users whose workflow is dominated by lightly threaded applications like certain CAD tools or legacy software may not see proportional gains.

Office and general productivity workloads are not the primary target for this processor. While the single-thread PassMark score of 1979 is adequate for web browsing and document editing, the platform's server-oriented nature—SP3 socket, registered DDR4 memory—makes it an unusual choice for a standard office desktop. It is best reserved for scenarios where the multi-threaded throughput and memory bandwidth are actively used, rather than for interactive responsiveness.

FAQ

Q: What is the total L3 cache available on the EPYC 7352?

A: The EPYC 7352 has 32 MB of L3 cache per die, with a total L3 cache of 128 MB across the processor.

Q: Does the EPYC 7352 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is enabled on this processor.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the EPYC 7352 provide?

A: The processor offers 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which are CPU-only lanes.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the EPYC 7352?

A: The memory bus is eight-channel, providing a memory bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s.

Q: Is the EPYC 7352 overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is unlocked is false, meaning it is not unlocked for overclocking.

Q: What is the process node for the EPYC 7352?

A: The processor is manufactured on a 7 nm process node by TSMC.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The EPYC 7352 presents a classic multi-thread-first profile. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 34314 is roughly 7.1 times the single-core score of 4844. This scaling factor is strong for a 24-core part, indicating that the chip can effectively distribute work across its physical and logical cores without significant contention. The data shows that the processor is designed for workloads that can utilize all 48 threads, such as rendering, encoding, and large-scale data processing.

The single-thread score, while not negligible, is clearly secondary. A PassMark single-thread score of 1979 places it in the mid-range for modern desktop CPUs, meaning that tasks like web browsing or single-threaded scripting will feel responsive but not exceptionally fast. The base clock of 2.30 GHz is low, which explains the modest single-thread performance; the boost clock of 3.20 GHz helps in short bursts but is not competitive with high-clocked workstation parts.

For real-world use, this split means the EPYC 7352 excels in batch operations where all cores are engaged for minutes or hours. Conversely, interactive workloads that depend on a single fast core—such as opening large spreadsheets or compiling a small code module—will not showcase the chip's strengths. The 128 MB L3 cache mitigates some of the single-thread latency issues by keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores, but the clock speed limitation remains the binding constraint in those scenarios. Users should prioritize this processor for throughput-oriented tasks and pair it with fast, high-capacity memory to fully leverage the eight-channel bandwidth.