INTEL

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores

20
Cores
20
Threads
5.3
GHz Boost
65W
TDP

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F Specifications

⚙️

Core Ultra 7 265F Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F features 20 physical cores and 20 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
20
Threads
20
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 12
SMP CPUs
1
⏱️

Ultra 7 265F Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in Core Ultra 7 265F benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Core Ultra 7 265F by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
2.4 GHz
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz
P-Core Turbo
5.1 GHz
E-Core Frequency
1800 MHz up to 4.6 GHz
Multiplier
24x
💾

Intel's Core Ultra 7 265F Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Ultra 7 265F processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Core Ultra 7 265F's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
30 MB (shared)
🏗️

Arrow Lake Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is built on Intel's 3 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Ultra 7 265F incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Arrow Lake
Codename
Arrow Lake-S
Process Node
3 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
17,800 million
Die Size
243 mm²
Generation
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake)
🔢

Arrow Lake Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The Core Ultra 7 265F by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
AVX-VNNI
FMA3
SHA
AES-NI
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Intel 64
VT-x
VT-d
TXT
Thread Director
AI Boost
🔌

Ultra 7 265F Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 65W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
65W
PL1 (Base Power)
65 W
PL2 (Turbo Power)
182 W
Tj Max
105°C
🔧

Intel Socket 1851 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Intel Socket 1851 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
Intel Socket 1851
Chipsets
Z890, B860, W880, Q870, H810
PCIe
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Package
FC-LGA18W
DDR5

Intel Socket 1851 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the Ultra 7 265F define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Core Ultra 7 265F determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
📦

Core Ultra 7 265F Product Information

Release and pricing details

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Core Ultra 7 265F by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.

Manufacturer
Intel
Release Date
Jan 2025
Launch Price
$379
Market
Desktop
Status
Active
Part Number
SRQCV

Core Ultra 7 265F Benchmark Scores

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource

Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Core Ultra 7 265F performs in parallel rendering workloads.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore #136 of 1788
4,137
28%
Max: 14,978
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how Intel Core Ultra 7 265F handles tasks that can't be parallelized.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore #136 of 1245
583
28%
Max: 2,114

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource

Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Core Ultra 7 265F. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors. Content creators and 3D artists use this benchmark to estimate real-world render performance.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore #136 of 1788
17,241
28%
Max: 62,412
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Core Ultra 7 265F. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs. Single-thread performance remains critical for gaming and applications with serial bottlenecks.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore #136 of 1784
2,433
28%
Max: 8,811
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource

Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Core Ultra 7 265F after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss. Professional users rely on R23 scores to predict real-world rendering performance under sustained workloads.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore #136 of 1788
41,051
28%
Max: 148,601
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how Intel Core Ultra 7 265F maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance. This score is particularly important for understanding real-world responsiveness beyond initial boost behavior.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore #136 of 1788
5,795
28%
Max: 20,979
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_data_compressionSource

Data compression measures how fast Intel Core Ultra 7 265F can compress and decompress files. This is important for archiving, backup software, and file transfer applications. Higher scores mean faster ZIP, RAR, and backup operations. Software distribution and cloud storage services benefit from efficient compression performance.

passmark_data_compression #130 of 528
489,271
9%
Max: 5,427,555
Compare with other CPUs

🏆 Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
5,427,555
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
4,680,013
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
4,517,407
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
3,929,890

passmark_data_encryptionSource

Data encryption tests how fast Intel Core Ultra 7 265F can encrypt information using AES and other algorithms. This is critical for security applications, VPNs, and secure communications. Modern CPUs with AES-NI hardware acceleration score significantly higher.

passmark_data_encryption #83 of 528
38,399
12%
Max: 316,606
Compare with other CPUs

🏆 Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
316,606
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
296,808
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
284,927
#4 AMD EPYC 9754
231,891
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
229,447

passmark_extended_instructionsSource

Extended instructions tests Intel Core Ultra 7 265F performance using SSE and AVX instruction sets. These specialized instructions accelerate multimedia, scientific, and AI workloads. Video encoding and image processing heavily utilize SIMD capabilities. Machine learning inference and scientific computing also benefit from strong SIMD performance.

passmark_extended_instructions #111 of 528
37,590
10%
Max: 392,159
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_find_prime_numbersSource

Find prime numbers tests Intel Core Ultra 7 265F ability to identify primes through intensive calculations. This is a pure computational benchmark that stresses CPU arithmetic units without memory bottlenecks.

passmark_find_prime_numbers #59 of 528
416
17%
Max: 2,422

passmark_floating_point_mathSource

Floating point math measures how Intel Core Ultra 7 265F handles decimal calculations critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering. This affects performance in CAD and physics simulations. Game physics engines also rely heavily on floating point operations. Scientific and engineering applications benefit significantly from higher floating point scores.

passmark_floating_point_math #42 of 528
172,749
15%
Max: 1,141,430
Compare with other CPUs

🏆 Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,141,430
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
978,377
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
922,900
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
761,219
#5 AMD EPYC 9655P
710,260

passmark_integer_mathSource

Integer math tests how fast Intel Core Ultra 7 265F processes whole number calculations essential for database operations and compression algorithms. This is fundamental to general computing performance. Encryption and data processing heavily rely on integer operations.

passmark_integer_math #127 of 528
137,936
8%
Max: 1,806,439
Compare with other CPUs

🏆 Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,806,439
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
1,687,531
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
1,549,946
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
1,224,315

passmark_multithreadSource

PassMark multi-thread tests Intel Core Ultra 7 265F across integer math, floating point, compression, and encryption using all cores. This provides an overall multi-threaded CPU performance score. The combined result reflects general-purpose parallel computing capability.

passmark_multithread #93 of 528
48,349
28%
Max: 174,825
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_physicsSource

Physics tests how Intel Core Ultra 7 265F handles physics simulations used in games and engineering software. This measures performance in calculating object interactions and movements. Games with complex physics benefit from higher scores. Engineering applications like structural analysis and fluid dynamics also rely on physics computation.

passmark_physics #90 of 528
3,063
11%
Max: 27,806
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_random_string_sortingSource

Random string sorting measures how fast Intel Core Ultra 7 265F can organize text data. This is important for database operations, search indexing, and data processing applications. Applications that process large amounts of text benefit from higher scores. Database servers and search engines rely heavily on efficient string manipulation.

passmark_random_string_sorting #121 of 528
60,446
10%
Max: 609,901
Compare with other CPUs

🏆 Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
609,901
#2 AMD EPYC 9755
571,185
#3 AMD EPYC 9845
538,060
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
468,975
#5 AMD EPYC 9655P
455,310

passmark_single_threadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of Intel Core Ultra 7 265F across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications.

passmark_single_thread #14 of 528
4,717
93%
Max: 5,097

passmark_singlethreadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of Intel Core Ultra 7 265F across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use.

passmark_singlethread #13 of 528
4,717
93%
Max: 5,097

About Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is built on the advanced Arrow Lake architecture, leveraging a 3nm process for a significant leap in transistor density and efficiency. This 20-core, 20-thread design forgoes Hyper-Threading, focusing instead on a balance of Performance-cores and Efficient-cores within its hybrid architecture. This architectural shift allows the chip to intelligently allocate workloads, maximizing throughput for demanding applications while conserving energy for background tasks. The move to the new Intel Socket 1851 underscores a platform transition, offering future-proofing for next-generation connectivity and memory support. By utilizing this cutting-edge 3nm node, Intel has achieved a remarkable blend of performance and power characteristics in this processor. The architectural foundation is a key reason for the strong multi-threaded benchmark results observed.

Clock speeds on this particular silicon are defined by a 2.40 GHz base clock and an impressive 5.30 GHz maximum turbo frequency, showcasing excellent single-threaded headroom. The substantial gap between base and turbo clocks illustrates a design philosophy centered on aggressive performance boosting during lighter workloads while maintaining a low-power baseline. This 265F variant achieves its 5.30 GHz peak primarily on a subset of its fastest cores, providing snappy responsiveness in gaming and creative applications. The high turbo clock directly contributes to its exceptional scores in single-threaded benchmark components, such as the random string sorting test. It is this turbo behavior that allows the chip to compete fiercely in latency-sensitive tasks despite its modest base frequency. The strategic clocking of this CPU ensures it delivers peak performance exactly when the user needs it most.

With a TDP rating of 65 watts, this 20-core processor demonstrates remarkable power efficiency for its class, a benefit of its 3nm fabrication. The defined thermal design power indicates a relatively cool and manageable heat output, making it suitable for a wide range of system builds from compact form factors to standard towers. Real-world power consumption will naturally scale with load, but the efficient architecture ensures sustained multi-core performance stays within expected thermal envelopes. This efficiency is a cornerstone of the Ultra 7 series, allowing the chip to deliver high benchmark numbers without the extreme power draw of flagship counterparts. The balanced power profile makes the Core Ultra 7 265F an compelling option for energy-conscious builders seeking high core counts. Its manageable TDP is a significant advantage for system integrators and enthusiasts alike.

The cache subsystem of this Intel offering is anchored by a substantial 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which acts as a high-speed data pool for all 20 cores. This large, intelligent cache hierarchy reduces latency by keeping frequently accessed data closer to the compute units, accelerating both gaming and productivity workloads. The shared design allows any core to rapidly access data generated by another, improving efficiency in heavily multi-threaded scenarios like the data compression benchmark. This generous cache allocation is a critical factor in the processor's strong integer and floating-point math performance, as seen in the provided benchmark data. For target use cases, this chip is ideally suited for content creation, software development, and high-refresh-rate gaming, offering a versatile performance profile. Ultimately, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F positions itself as a powerful and efficient engine for demanding desktop users.

The AMD Equivalent of Core Ultra 7 265F

Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 7 260 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.

AMD Ryzen 7 260

AMD • 8 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular Intel Core Ultra 7 265F Comparisons

See how the Core Ultra 7 265F stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare Core Ultra 7 265F with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs