AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is a 7000-series mobile processor from AMD, built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename. It uses an 8-core, 16-thread layout, with a 3.20 GHz base clock, a 4.75 GHz boost clock, a 35 W TDP, and a 6 nm TSMC process node on a 210 mm² die. Its average benchmark score is 23864, which places it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs in the database. The nearest rival set is exceptionally tight: every listed competitor sits within a deltaPct of 0.1 percent or less, meaning the 7735HS lands in a crowded performance band rather than a clearly dominant position.

Who Should Consider It

The 7735HS is best suited for mobile systems that need 16 concurrent threads without moving into a higher power class. The benchmark results show strong multi-threaded scaling: Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 19691, Cinebench R20 multicore reaches 8270, Cinebench R15 multicore reaches 1984, and Geekbench multicore reaches 8983. Passmark multithread scores 23166, which aligns with the Cinebench pattern. For rendering, video encoding, code compilation, or other workloads that can use all 16 threads, the 7735HS delivers a substantially larger score than its single-thread results would suggest.

Single-thread performance is more modest. Cinebench R23 singlecore scores 2780, Cinebench R20 singlecore scores 1167, Cinebench R15 singlecore scores 280, Geekbench singlecore scores 1929, and Passmark singlethread scores 3296. These numbers indicate a capable but not exceptional single-thread response, meaning everyday office tasks that depend on short bursts of performance will be served well without being a marquee feature. Passmark integer math scores 85309 and floating point math scores 47865, so general productivity arithmetic is strong. For data-heavy office work, Passmark data compression scores 293278, random string sorting scores 30388, and data encryption scores 18237, which point to comfortable headroom in archiving and file-management workloads.

For creation-oriented users, the extended instruction score of 20050 in Passmark suggests the CPU can handle workloads that use modern SIMD code paths. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides ample parallel resources for creative applications that scale across cores. The 16 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support help keep those cores fed in multi-threaded tasks.

For gaming, the data is less about discrete GPU performance and more about CPU thread scaling. The 3DMark 16-thread score is 6870, and the max-threads score is 6872, which are almost identical; this indicates that the workload is effectively saturated at 16 threads. The 8-thread score is 5697, the 4-thread score is 3382, the 2-thread score is 1773, and the single-thread score is 912. The jump from 4 threads to 8 threads is large, meaning games that use more than four threads will benefit significantly from this CPU. The integrated Radeon 680M graphics unit is also listed, so systems using only the CPU’s integrated graphics have a defined rendering path, though the pack contains no game-specific frame-rate data.

Power and Thermals

The 7735HS is a 35 W TDP part. That places it in the mainstream mobile processing envelope, where cooling solutions can be relatively compact. The 6 nm TSMC process and 210 mm² die are the physical context for that 35 W TDP: the design is intended for systems that need solid multi-core throughput in a thermally constrained chassis. The base clock is 3.20 GHz and the boost clock is 4.75 GHz, so the CPU has a wide clock range to work within its power limit. The data does not include a cooler specification, but the 35 W TDP class implies that the cooling tier is not a high-power desktop-style cooling system; it is a notebook-class thermal solution. The multiplier is locked, with multiplierUnlocked set to false, so end-user overclocking is not an intended path for extracting additional thermal headroom.

How It Compares

The nearestRivals table shows that the 7735HS sits inside a very narrow performance cluster. Its average benchmark score is 23864, and every rival average score is between 23835 and 23887. The deltaPct values are all in the range of -0.1 to 0.1, which is effectively measurement noise in aggregate benchmarking.

Against the AMD Ryzen 5 220, the 7735HS is at exact parity. The Ryzen 5 220 has an average score of 23867 and a deltaPct of 0. In the overall average benchmark score, the two parts are indistinguishable. Users deciding between them would need to rely on platform features, not the aggregate benchmark result, because the data shows no meaningful performance separation.

Against the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, the 7735HS trails by a slim margin. The Core Ultra 9 288V averages 23887, with a deltaPct of -0.1 for the 7735HS. A 0.1 percent deficit is not a practical difference in real-world workloads, but it does mean the Intel part claims the higher nominal average in this dataset.

Against the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, the 7735HS is nominally ahead. The Ryzen 7 6800H averages 23839, and the deltaPct is 0.1. Like the other comparisons, the gap is tiny, but the sign of the deltaPct places the 7735HS on the leading side of the pair.

Against the Intel Xeon 6333P, the 7735HS again shows a 0.1 percent advantage. The Xeon 6333P averages 23835, the lowest score among the listed rivals. The deltaPct of 0.1 means the 7735HS’s average is higher, but the magnitude is small enough that the two CPUs occupy the same performance tier.

Overall, the data shows the 7735HS competing in a four-way dead heat. None of the nearest rivals are separated by more than one-tenth of a percent in average score, so benchmark comparisons among these parts should be treated as statistical ties rather than decisive wins or losses.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the memory support entry lists ECC memory as true. The platform also supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What integrated graphics does the 7735HS include?

A: The integrated graphics are listed as Radeon 680M. The CPU also has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Can the 7735HS be overclocked?

A: No, the multiplierUnlocked field is false. The CPU does not provide an unlocked multiplier for end-user overclocking.

Q: What socket is the 7735HS designed for?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7. The part number field also lists an FP7r2 variant: the part numbers are 100-000000985(FP7) and 100-000000989(FP7r2).

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the 7735HS provide?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, listed as CPU only.

Q: What is the production status of the 7735HS?

A: The production status is Active. The release date is 2023-03-31.

Platform and Compatibility

The 7735HS belongs to the AMD 7000 series and is classified in the mobile market segment. Its socket is AMD Socket FP7, and the architecture is Zen 3+ under the Rembrandt-R codename. The platform supports DDR5 memory only, through a dual-channel memory bus with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. For expansion, the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU itself.

The cache hierarchy is clearly defined: 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics are Radeon 680M, which means systems built around this CPU have a built-in display output path without requiring a discrete GPU. The memory controller is tied to DDR5, so the motherboard or system design must supply DDR5 modules rather than older memory types.

The CPU is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 210 mm². It is not an unlocked part, so platform overclocking is not part of the intended usage model. The production status is Active, and the part number variants include 100-000000985(FP7) and 100-000000989(FP7r2), covering both the FP7 and FP7r2 socket revisions. In terms of upgrade path, the data provided lists only this CPU for Socket FP7, so no other compatible processors are quantified in this benchmark set. The 35 W TDP and mobile market segment indicate that this is a notebook-class part, not a desktop socket part, and platform compatibility decisions will be driven by that mobile form factor.