AMD

AMD EPYC 7C13

AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores

64
Cores
128
Threads
3.68
GHz Boost
225W
TDP
ECC Memory

At a Glance

AMD
Cores / Threads 64C / 128T
Boost Clock 3.68 GHz
Base Clock 2000 GHz
L3 Cache 256 MB (shared)
TDP 225W
Architecture Zen 3
Socket AMD Socket SP3
nm
Process 7 nm

AMD EPYC 7C13 Specifications

EPYC 7C13 Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The AMD EPYC 7C13 features 64 physical cores and 128 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
64
Threads
128
CCDs
8
Cores per CCD
8
SMP CPUs
2

EPYC 7C13 Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in EPYC 7C13 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The EPYC 7C13 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
2000 GHz
Boost Clock
3.68 GHz
Multiplier
20x

AMD's EPYC 7C13 Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the EPYC 7C13 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The EPYC 7C13's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)

Zen 3 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The AMD EPYC 7C13 is built on AMD's 7 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in EPYC 7C13 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Zen 3
Codename
Milan
Process Node
7 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
33,200 million
Die Size
8x 81 mm²
Generation
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))

Zen 3 Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The EPYC 7C13 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
XFR 2

Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The AMD EPYC 7C13 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 225W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
225W
Configurable TDP
165 W

AMD Socket SP3 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The EPYC 7C13 uses the AMD Socket SP3 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
AMD Socket SP3
PCIe
Gen 4, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Package
FCLGA-4094
DDR5

AMD Socket SP3 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the EPYC 7C13 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the EPYC 7C13 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR4
Memory Bus
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
204.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Supported

Product Information

Release and pricing details

The AMD EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the EPYC 7C13 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.

Manufacturer
AMD
Market
Server/Workstation
Status
Active
Part Number
100-000000315

About AMD EPYC 7C13

The AMD EPYC 7C13 is a 64-core, 128-thread server processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Milan, and is part of the EPYC 7003 series. It operates on the AMD Socket SP3 platform and is fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process node, with a total of 33,200 million transistors across an 8x 81 mm² die configuration. The chip is positioned for the Server/Workstation market segment and remains in active production.

Platform and Compatibility

The EPYC 7C13 uses the AMD Socket SP3, a platform designed for dual-socket and single-socket enterprise deployments. This socket supports the full EPYC 7003 series lineup, allowing for straightforward upgrades within the same generation without requiring a board change. The processor integrates 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes directly from the CPU, a substantial number that accommodates high-density storage arrays, multiple high-speed network adapters, and GPU accelerators without needing additional PCIe switches. The platform supports DDR4 memory across an eight-channel memory bus, yielding a peak memory bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s. This bandwidth figure is critical for memory-intensive workloads such as large in-memory databases and high-performance computing simulations. ECC memory is supported, which is a mandatory feature for reliable server operation in data centers where data integrity is non-negotiable. The architecture is Zen 3, representing a mature and well-optimized design within AMD's server portfolio. The upgrade path is clear: systems built for Socket SP3 can move between various EPYC 7003 parts, though moving to newer generations would require a platform change. The processor has a locked multiplier, confirming its target audience is not overclockers but rather system integrators and enterprise buyers who prioritize stability and consistent performance over manual tuning.

Who Should Consider It

This processor is engineered for workloads that scale with core count. The benchmark data shows a multi-threaded score of 64,873 in Cinebench R23, placing it in the 99th percentile of all CPUs tracked. This indicates exceptional performance in heavily parallel tasks. For content creation, specifically 3D rendering or video encoding, the high core count and strong floating-point performance (a PassMark floating-point math score of 266,846) make it a viable choice for render farms or workstations that handle overnight batch renders. However, single-threaded performance is relatively modest; the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 9,158 and PassMark single-thread score of 2,618 suggest that lightly threaded applications, such as legacy office suites or single-threaded scripting tasks, will not see the same dramatic gains. For general office productivity, this processor is overkill unless the environment also runs substantial background virtualization or data processing. Server-side tasks like data encryption and compression are standout areas: PassMark data encryption scores 114,769 and data compression scores 1,562,251, indicating strong suitability for database workloads, backup servers, and any application that moves large volumes of data. The processor also handles integer math exceptionally well, with a PassMark integer math score of 492,554, which benefits financial modeling and scientific computing. For gaming, this is not a target part; the architecture prioritizes throughput over latency-sensitive single-thread speed, and the lack of an integrated GPU means a discrete graphics card is mandatory.

Power and Thermals

The EPYC 7C13 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 225 watts. This is a high power envelope, characteristic of a 64-core part operating at a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 3.68 GHz. The data indicates that the chip requires robust thermal management. A capable air cooler designed for high-TDP server sockets may suffice for operation in a well-ventilated chassis, but for sustained all-core workloads, a high-performance liquid cooler or a server-grade heatsink with high static pressure fans is recommended to maintain boost clocks and prevent thermal throttling. The 7 nm process node from TSMC helps mitigate power draw relative to older nodes, but the sheer number of active cores means that the 225 W TDP is a realistic reflection of sustained power consumption under load. System integrators must ensure the power delivery circuitry on the motherboard can supply stable current to the CPU, as the eight-channel memory controller and 128 PCIe lanes also draw power. Thermal management is not just a cooling concern but also a system-level design consideration; the chassis airflow must handle the heat output from the CPU, memory modules, and any expansion cards. In a dense server environment, this TDP class typically requires 1U or 2U chassis with optimized airflow paths or direct liquid cooling solutions.

How It Compares

Against the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, the EPYC 7C13 trails by 2.3% in average benchmark score. The Threadripper PRO, a workstation-focused part, edges out the EPYC in aggregate benchmarks, likely due to higher boost clocks on fewer active cores in certain tests. The EPYC retakes the lead over the AMD EPYC 9375F, posting a 3.3% higher average score. The 9375F is a newer part, but the 7C13's higher core count gives it an advantage in multi-threaded throughput. Similarly, the EPYC 7C13 outperforms the AMD EPYC 7663 by 3.6%, a margin that indicates the 7C13 is the stronger choice for most server workloads. The widest gap is against the AMD EPYC 9355P, where the 7C13 leads by 4.3%. The 9355P is a single-socket part, and the data shows the 7C13's additional cores provide a meaningful performance buffer.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark results paint a clear picture of multi-threaded dominance with moderate single-thread capability. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score of 6,539 is roughly 7.1 times the single-core score of 923, illustrating excellent scaling across the 128 threads. This scaling is consistent in Cinebench R20, where the multicore score of 27,246 is about 7.1 times the single-core score of 3,846. Cinebench R23 shows a similar ratio, with a multicore score of 64,873 versus a single-core score of 9,158. The ratios are not perfectly linear due to memory bandwidth limits and thermal behavior, but they demonstrate that the architecture efficiently utilizes its core count.

PassMark results provide further granularity. The multithread score of 76,322 is exceptional, and the single-thread score of 2,618 is roughly 3.4% of that value, highlighting the disparity between single and multi-threaded performance. Data compression scores 1,562,251, which is a standout figure; this is over 13 times the integer math score of 492,554, indicating that the processor's large 256 MB shared L3 cache and high memory bandwidth are particularly effective for compression algorithms. Data encryption scores 114,769, a strong result that benefits from the AES-NI instructions and the high core count. Extended instructions score 85,034, showing solid performance in vectorized workloads. Floating-point math scores 266,846, which is roughly 54% of the integer math score, a predictable outcome given that integer operations are often simpler to parallelize. Find prime numbers scores 539, which is a relatively low absolute number but still places the chip in the 99th percentile.

The average benchmark score of 167,788 is the aggregate metric used for comparison. Relative to the nearest rivals, the data shows a tight cluster: the Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 2.3% higher, the EPYC 9375F is 3.3% lower, the EPYC 7663 is 3.6% lower, and the EPYC 9355P is 4.3% lower. These deltas are small, meaning that real-world differences will depend heavily on the specific workload. For example, in Cinebench R23 multicore, the 7C13's score of 64,873 would translate to a lead of roughly 2,300 points over the EPYC 9355P if the average score delta holds across all tests. The PassMark physics score of 4,904 and random string sorting score of 131,361 further confirm that the processor excels in structured, parallel tasks. The data consistently indicates that the EPYC 7C13 is a top-tier part for server workloads, with its primary weakness being single-threaded performance, which is acceptable given its intended market segment. The 99th percentile ranking among all CPUs is a strong validation of its overall capability.

Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the AMD EPYC 7C13 are below.

Benchmark Scores

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource

Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how AMD EPYC 7C13 performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. The R15 version remains useful for comparing against older hardware benchmarks. Higher scores directly correlate with faster render times in Cinema 4D and similar 3D applications.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore #58 of 1967
6,539
44%
Max: 14,978

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how AMD EPYC 7C13 handles tasks that can't be parallelized across multiple cores. Games and many desktop applications still rely heavily on single-thread performance. A higher single-core score means snappier system responsiveness in everyday use.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore #52 of 1400
923
44%
Max: 2,114

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource

Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on AMD EPYC 7C13. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore #57 of 1786
27,246
44%
Max: 62,412
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of AMD EPYC 7C13. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore #52 of 1776
3,846
44%
Max: 8,811

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource

Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of AMD EPYC 7C13 after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore #57 of 1938
64,873
44%
Max: 148,601
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how AMD EPYC 7C13 maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore #43 of 1923
9,158
44%
Max: 20,979

passmark_data_compressionSource

Data compression measures how fast AMD EPYC 7C13 can compress and decompress files. This is important for archiving, backup software, and file transfer applications. Higher scores mean faster ZIP, RAR, and backup operations.

passmark_data_compression #36 of 696
1,562,251
28%
Max: 5,679,990
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
5,679,990
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
4,680,013
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
4,517,407
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
3,929,890

Nearby Performers

passmark_data_encryptionSource

Data encryption tests how fast AMD EPYC 7C13 can encrypt information using AES and other algorithms. This is critical for security applications, VPNs, and secure communications.

passmark_data_encryption #29 of 696
114,769
33%
Max: 348,449
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
348,449
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
296,808
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
284,927
#4 AMD EPYC 9754
231,891
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
229,447

Nearby Performers

passmark_extended_instructionsSource

Extended instructions tests AMD EPYC 7C13 performance using SSE and AVX instruction sets. These specialized instructions accelerate multimedia, scientific, and AI workloads. Video encoding and image processing heavily utilize SIMD capabilities.

passmark_extended_instructions #52 of 696
85,034
22%
Max: 383,298
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
383,298
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
314,798
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
303,321
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
280,477

passmark_find_prime_numbersSource

Find prime numbers tests AMD EPYC 7C13 ability to identify primes through intensive calculations. This is a pure computational benchmark that stresses CPU arithmetic units without memory bottlenecks. The test reveals raw mathematical processing capability. Higher scores indicate superior arithmetic throughput independent of memory subsystem performance.

passmark_find_prime_numbers #62 of 696
539
22%
Max: 2,422

passmark_floating_point_mathSource

Floating point math measures how AMD EPYC 7C13 handles decimal calculations critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering. This affects performance in CAD and physics simulations. Game physics engines also rely heavily on floating point operations.

passmark_floating_point_math #40 of 696
266,846
23%
Max: 1,153,453
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,153,453
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
978,377
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
922,900
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
761,219

passmark_integer_mathSource

Integer math tests how fast AMD EPYC 7C13 processes whole number calculations essential for database operations and compression algorithms. This is fundamental to general computing performance.

passmark_integer_math #28 of 696
492,554
26%
Max: 1,926,069
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,926,069
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
1,687,531
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
1,549,946
#4 AMD EPYC 9655P
1,225,251
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
1,224,315

passmark_multithreadSource

PassMark multi-thread tests AMD EPYC 7C13 across integer math, floating point, compression, and encryption using all cores. This provides an overall multi-threaded CPU performance score.

passmark_multithread #46 of 696
76,322
45%
Max: 171,200
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#2 AMD EPYC 9755
166,328
#3 AMD EPYC 9965
160,542
#4 AMD EPYC 9655P
160,490
#5 AMD EPYC 9655
156,110

passmark_physicsSource

Physics tests how AMD EPYC 7C13 handles physics simulations used in games and engineering software. This measures performance in calculating object interactions and movements. Games with complex physics benefit from higher scores.

passmark_physics #71 of 696
4,904
18%
Max: 27,806
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9755
27,806
#2 AMD EPYC 9655
25,947
#3 AMD EPYC 9655P
25,847
#4 Intel Xeon 6960P
24,937
#5 AMD EPYC 9684X
24,686

passmark_random_string_sortingSource

Random string sorting measures how fast AMD EPYC 7C13 can organize text data. This is important for database operations, search indexing, and data processing applications. Applications that process large amounts of text benefit from higher scores.

passmark_random_string_sorting #49 of 696
131,361
21%
Max: 633,030
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
633,030
#2 AMD EPYC 9755
571,185
#3 AMD EPYC 9845
538,060
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
468,975
#5 AMD EPYC 9655P
451,824

Nearby Performers

passmark_single_threadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 7C13 across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use. Many legacy applications and games still depend heavily on single-thread speed.

passmark_single_thread #580 of 696
2,618
51%
Max: 5,087

passmark_singlethreadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 7C13 across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications.

passmark_singlethread #580 of 696
2,618
51%
Max: 5,087

Compare with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs