AMD

AMD EPYC 9475F

AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores

48
Cores
96
Threads
4.8
GHz Boost
400W
TDP
ECC Memory

At a Glance

AMD
Cores / Threads 48C / 96T
Boost Clock 4.8 GHz
Base Clock 3.65 GHz
L3 Cache 256 MB (shared)
TDP 400W
Architecture Zen 5
Socket AMD Socket SP5
nm
Process 4 nm
Released Oct 2024

AMD EPYC 9475F Specifications

EPYC 9475F Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The AMD EPYC 9475F features 48 physical cores and 96 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
48
Threads
96
SMP CPUs
2

EPYC 9475F Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in EPYC 9475F benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The EPYC 9475F by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
3.65 GHz
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
Multiplier
36.5x

AMD's EPYC 9475F Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the EPYC 9475F processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The EPYC 9475F's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)

Zen 5 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The AMD EPYC 9475F is built on AMD's 4 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in EPYC 9475F incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Zen 5
Codename
Turin
Process Node
4 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
66,520 million
Die Size
8x 70.6 mm²
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Zen 5 Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The EPYC 9475F by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
AVX-512
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2

EPYC 9475F Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The AMD EPYC 9475F has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 400W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
400W
Configurable TDP
320-400 W

AMD Socket SP5 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The EPYC 9475F uses the AMD Socket SP5 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
AMD Socket SP5
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Package
FC-LGA6096
DDR5

AMD Socket SP5 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the EPYC 9475F define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the EPYC 9475F determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Supported

EPYC 9475F Product Information

Release and pricing details

The AMD EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the EPYC 9475F by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Oct 2024
Launch Price
$7592
Market
Server/Workstation
Status
Active
Part Number
100-000001143

EPYC 9475F Benchmark Scores

passmark_data_compressionSource

Data compression measures how fast AMD EPYC 9475F can compress and decompress files. This is important for archiving, backup software, and file transfer applications.

passmark_data_compression #24 of 696
2,156,305
38%
Max: 5,679,990
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
5,679,990
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
4,680,013
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
4,517,407
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
3,929,890

Nearby Performers

#19 Intel Xeon 6980P
2,364,519
#20 Intel Xeon 6774P
2,309,868
#21 AMD EPYC 9535
2,308,822
#22 Intel Xeon 696X
2,264,907
#23 AMD EPYC 9634
2,236,412
#25 AMD EPYC 9455P
1,928,897
#27 Intel Xeon 6747P
1,833,378
#28 Intel Xeon w9-3595X
1,831,962
#29 Intel Xeon 6741P
1,816,408

passmark_data_encryptionSource

Data encryption tests how fast AMD EPYC 9475F can encrypt information using AES and other algorithms. This is critical for security applications, VPNs, and secure communications. Modern CPUs with AES-NI hardware acceleration score significantly higher. Disk encryption, secure browsing, and VPN performance all benefit from faster encryption.

passmark_data_encryption #26 of 696
116,648
33%
Max: 348,449
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
348,449
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
296,808
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
284,927
#4 AMD EPYC 9754
231,891
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
229,447

Nearby Performers

passmark_extended_instructionsSource

Extended instructions tests AMD EPYC 9475F performance using SSE and AVX instruction sets. These specialized instructions accelerate multimedia, scientific, and AI workloads.

passmark_extended_instructions #21 of 696
173,169
45%
Max: 383,298
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
383,298
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
314,798
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
303,321
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
280,477

passmark_find_prime_numbersSource

Find prime numbers tests AMD EPYC 9475F ability to identify primes through intensive calculations. This is a pure computational benchmark that stresses CPU arithmetic units without memory bottlenecks. The test reveals raw mathematical processing capability.

passmark_find_prime_numbers #7 of 696
1,507
62%
Max: 2,422
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_floating_point_mathSource

Floating point math measures how AMD EPYC 9475F handles decimal calculations critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering. This affects performance in CAD and physics simulations.

passmark_floating_point_math #23 of 696
406,524
35%
Max: 1,153,453
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,153,453
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
978,377
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
922,900
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
761,219

Nearby Performers

passmark_integer_mathSource

Integer math tests how fast AMD EPYC 9475F processes whole number calculations essential for database operations and compression algorithms. This is fundamental to general computing performance. Encryption and data processing heavily rely on integer operations. Higher scores benefit applications that work primarily with non-decimal numbers.

passmark_integer_math #22 of 696
605,696
31%
Max: 1,926,069
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,926,069
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
1,687,531
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
1,549,946
#4 AMD EPYC 9655P
1,225,251
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
1,224,315

Nearby Performers

passmark_multithreadSource

PassMark multi-thread tests AMD EPYC 9475F across integer math, floating point, compression, and encryption using all cores. This provides an overall multi-threaded CPU performance score. The combined result reflects general-purpose parallel computing capability. Results can be compared against millions of submissions in the PassMark database.

passmark_multithread #14 of 696
122,476
72%
Max: 171,200
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#2 AMD EPYC 9755
166,328
#3 AMD EPYC 9965
160,542
#4 AMD EPYC 9655P
160,490
#5 AMD EPYC 9655
156,110

Nearby Performers

passmark_physicsSource

Physics tests how AMD EPYC 9475F handles physics simulations used in games and engineering software. This measures performance in calculating object interactions and movements.

passmark_physics #14 of 696
16,443
59%
Max: 27,806
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9755
27,806
#2 AMD EPYC 9655
25,947
#3 AMD EPYC 9655P
25,847
#4 Intel Xeon 6960P
24,937
#5 AMD EPYC 9684X
24,686

passmark_random_string_sortingSource

Random string sorting measures how fast AMD EPYC 9475F can organize text data. This is important for database operations, search indexing, and data processing applications.

passmark_random_string_sorting #21 of 696
253,936
40%
Max: 633,030
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
633,030
#2 AMD EPYC 9755
571,185
#3 AMD EPYC 9845
538,060
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
468,975
#5 AMD EPYC 9655P
451,824

Nearby Performers

passmark_single_threadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 9475F across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use.

passmark_single_thread #247 of 696
3,779
74%
Max: 5,087

passmark_singlethreadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 9475F across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use. Many legacy applications and games still depend heavily on single-thread speed.

passmark_singlethread #247 of 696
3,779
74%
Max: 5,087

About AMD EPYC 9475F

The AMD EPYC 9475F is a 48-core, 96-thread server processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, marketed under the EPYC 9005 series (codename Turin). It is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process, with a base clock of 3.65 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The processor is designed for Socket SP5, supports DDR5 memory across a twelve-channel bus, and provides 128 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. With a TDP of 400 W, this is a high-power part aimed at dense compute workloads, not desktop systems.

Platform and Compatibility

The EPYC 9475F uses the AMD Socket SP5 platform, which is exclusive to EPYC 9005 series processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory exclusively, with a twelve-channel memory bus that yields a peak memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. For servers or workstations that rely heavily on memory throughput, this bandwidth is critical for feeding 48 Zen 5 cores. ECC memory is supported, which is a standard requirement for data integrity in server environments.

PCIe connectivity is robust: the CPU provides 128 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which can be used for high-speed storage, networking, or accelerators. This lane count allows for multiple GPUs or NVMe drives without needing a separate PCIe switch. The platform does not support an integrated GPU, so a discrete graphics adapter is mandatory for display output, though that is rarely a concern in server deployments.

Upgrade path considerations are straightforward: the EPYC 9475F is a current-generation part, and the SP5 socket is shared across the EPYC 9005 series. This means a system built around this socket can accommodate other 9005 series processors, but no cross-generation compatibility is indicated in the data. The processor’s production status is active, and its release date is 2024-10-09, so it is a recent addition to the market. The launch MSRP is $7592, which positions it as a premium part, but the platform cost is typical for dual-socket or high-core-count servers.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The EPYC 9475F has a base clock of 3.65 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The boost clock is notably high for a 48-core processor, suggesting strong single-thread performance relative to other server chips. However, the benchmark data provided does not include specific single-thread or multi-thread scores, so conclusions must be drawn from the architecture and clock behavior. With 48 cores and 96 threads, the multi-threaded capacity is substantial for parallel workloads like rendering, scientific simulations, or database processing.

The single-thread performance is influenced by the high boost clock, which is useful for workloads that are not fully parallelized, such as legacy applications or parts of a code that are serial. In contrast, the multi-thread performance is driven by the core count and the shared 256 MB L3 cache, which reduces memory latency for data that fits within the cache. The cache configuration includes 80 KB L1 per core and 1 MB L2 per core, which are standard for Zen 5, but the large L3 is a differentiator for workloads that reuse data frequently.

Real-world behavior shows a split: tasks that are single-threaded will benefit from the 4.80 GHz boost, while tasks that scale across cores will see near-linear gains up to 48 cores. The twelve-channel memory bus ensures that multi-threaded workloads are not starved for data, as 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth is ample for feeding 96 threads. The absence of benchmark scores in the provided data means the percentile ranking of 50th among all CPUs is the only relative metric available, but that is based on a zero average score, so it carries no practical weight.

Power and Thermals

The TDP of this processor is 400 W, which is high even for server parts. This figure indicates the maximum sustained power draw under typical load, and it directly influences cooling requirements. A 400 W TDP requires a robust cooling solution: either a high-end air cooler designed for server sockets or a liquid cooling loop. Given the 8x 70.6 mm² die size (totaling 8 chiplets), the heat is spread across multiple dies, which can help with thermal density but still requires efficient heat removal.

The process node is 4 nm, which is efficient for the transistor count of 66,520 million, but the high clock speeds and core count push power consumption to the limit. In practice, a server chassis must provide adequate airflow, and the cooling system must be rated for at least 400 W of dissipation. The data does not specify thermal limits or power management features, so it is safe to assume that standard EPYC 9005 series power management applies, but that is not confirmed.

For system builders, the implication is clear: this is not a part for a small form factor or passively cooled chassis. The cooling tier requires either a high-static-pressure fan array or a liquid cooler with a large radiator. The 400 W TDP also suggests that the power delivery on the motherboard must be robust, with adequate VRM cooling to sustain boost clocks under sustained load. The twelve-channel memory bus adds to the power draw, as each memory channel requires termination power, but that is a secondary consideration.

Who Should Consider It

The EPYC 9475F is aimed at server and workstation workloads that demand high core counts and high memory bandwidth. For database workloads, the 48 cores and 96 threads allow for many concurrent queries, while the 256 MB L3 cache can hold frequently accessed index pages. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is beneficial for analytical queries that scan large tables.

For content creation and rendering, the core count is a strong fit. Rendering engines that scale across cores will see near-linear speedups, and the boost clock of 4.80 GHz helps with single-threaded tasks like asset importing or physics calculations. The absence of an integrated GPU means a dedicated GPU is required, but that is typical for workstations.

For office productivity, this processor is overkill, but it can handle it without breaking a sweat. The high core count is wasted on spreadsheet or word processing tasks, and the 400 W TDP makes it inefficient for such workloads. The data shows no benchmark scores, so the percentile ranking of 50th is uninformative, but the architecture suggests that this part is best suited for multi-threaded compute, not interactive use.

The launch MSRP of $7592 places it in the high-end server segment, so it is intended for data centers or professional workstations where uptime and throughput justify the cost. The active production status and release date of 2024-10-09 suggest it is a current-generation part, so it will be supported for years to come.

Benchmark Performance

The provided FACT PACK includes no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and no deltaPct values. The average benchmark score is 0, and the percentile versus all CPUs is 50. This is an unusual situation because the percentile is meaningless without actual scores; a 50th percentile with a zero score suggests that the benchmark database has not yet recorded any results for this processor. Therefore, any performance analysis must rely on architectural specifications rather than measured numbers.

Without rival data, it is impossible to state exact percentage deltas against competing processors. However, the specifications allow for qualitative comparisons. The 48 cores and 4.80 GHz boost clock are competitive with other high-core-count server parts, but without numbers, no definitive claims can be made. The memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s is a strong point, as many server workloads are memory-bound.

The lack of benchmark data means that this entry is incomplete for performance evaluation. The processor’s architecture is known to be Zen 5, which is a recent design, but the actual performance in integer or floating-point workloads is not quantified here. The 256 MB L3 cache is large, which should help with cache-sensitive workloads, but again, no scores confirm this.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the AMD EPYC 9475F use?

A: It uses AMD Socket SP5, which is exclusive to the EPYC 9005 series.

Q: Does the EPYC 9475F support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported, which is standard for server reliability.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides 128 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are available from the processor itself.

Q: What is the L3 cache size on this processor?

A: The L3 cache is 256 MB, shared across all 48 cores.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the EPYC 9475F?

A: The launch MSRP is $7592.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What process node is used for this processor?

A: It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a transistor count of 66,520 million.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this processor?

A: The memory bandwidth is 576.0 GB/s, achieved via a twelve-channel DDR5 bus.

The Intel Equivalent of EPYC 9475F

Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-14501TE offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.

Intel Core i5-14501TE

Intel • 6 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular AMD EPYC 9475F Comparisons

See how the EPYC 9475F stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare EPYC 9475F with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs