AMD EPYC 9374F

The AMD EPYC 9374F is a 32-core, 64-thread server processor from the EPYC 9004 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture (Genoa) and fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. It runs at a base clock of 3.85 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, with a 320 W TDP. Launched on November 9, 2022, it carries a launch MSRP of $4850. The chip supports DDR5 memory across twelve channels, providing 460.8 GB/s of bandwidth, and offers 128 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. With a 75th percentile ranking among all CPUs, it targets heavy server and workstation workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The EPYC 9374F’s benchmark results are defined by a sharp split between multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. In multi-core tests, it delivers strong parallel throughput: Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 7,026 points, R20 multi-core reaches 29,276, R23 multi-core hits 69,707, and Geekbench multi-core lands at 18,263. These numbers indicate that the processor can sustain heavy computational loads across all 32 cores, making it suitable for rendering, simulation, and data processing. Single-core scores are more modest: Cinebench R15 single-core is 991, R20 single-core is 4,133, R23 single-core is 9,841, and Geekbench single-core is 2,306. While not class-leading, these single-core figures are respectable for a server chip and handle typical administrative or light interactive tasks without issue.

The average benchmark score, computed across all listed tests, is 17,693. This places the EPYC 9374F at the 75th percentile of all CPUs in the database, meaning it outperforms 75% of tested processors. However, the average score is heavily influenced by the mix of multi- and single-core tests. The nearest rivals in the database are all low-power consumer or mobile parts: the Intel Core i3-13100F (average score 17,665), Intel Core i3-14100T (17,636), AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE (17,810), and Intel Core i7-1255U (17,813). The EPYC 9374F is 0.2% ahead of the i3-13100F and 0.3% ahead of the i3-14100T, while trailing the Ryzen 3 8300GE and i7-1255U by 0.7% each. These deltas are negligible in absolute terms, but they highlight a key point: the EPYC’s average score is dragged down by its comparatively modest single-core results, even though its multi-core scores dwarf those of any of these rivals. For workloads that scale across cores, the EPYC 9374F is in a completely different performance class.

Power and Thermals

The EPYC 9374F carries a TDP of 320 W. This is a high-power part, typical of server processors with 32 or more cores running at high clock speeds. Such a TDP demands a robust cooling solution—a large server-grade heatsink with high static-pressure fans, or a liquid cooling loop designed for dense chassis environments. The 5 nm process node helps keep power efficiency reasonable, but the sheer core count and boost clock of 4.30 GHz still require substantial thermal dissipation. The absence of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory for any video output, adding to system power requirements. In a typical server rack, the thermal design is handled by the chassis airflow and heatsink selection, but any workstation build using this chip must budget for high-capacity cooling. The locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) also means no overclocking headroom, so the TDP is a hard limit for sustained operation.

Who Should Consider It

The EPYC 9374F is engineered for workloads that exploit its 32 cores and 64 threads. The multi-core benchmark scores—especially Cinebench R23 multi-core at 69,707 and Geekbench multi-core at 18,263—make it a strong candidate for 3D rendering, video encoding, scientific simulation, and large-scale data analysis. The 256 MB of shared L3 cache and 12-channel DDR5 memory with 460.8 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for memory-intensive applications, such as in-memory databases or complex computational models. The 128 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow the connection of multiple GPUs, NVMe storage arrays, or network accelerators, making it suitable for AI training, virtualization hosts, or high-performance computing nodes.

For gaming, the EPYC 9374F is not an ideal choice. Its single-core scores, while adequate, are far lower than those of top-end desktop processors, and the platform cost and power draw are excessive for a gaming rig. It will run games, but the performance per dollar is poor. For office productivity and everyday desktop use, the chip is vastly overkill; a mainstream desktop processor would deliver similar or better single-thread performance at a fraction of the power. The EPYC 9374F shines in server and workstation environments where parallel throughput and memory bandwidth are the primary bottlenecks. If your workload is heavily multi-threaded and can utilize 32 cores, this processor is a viable option.

Platform and Compatibility

The EPYC 9374F uses AMD Socket SP5, which is the platform for the EPYC 9004 series (Genoa). It supports DDR5 memory in a twelve-channel configuration, with ECC memory enabled, providing 460.8 GB/s of theoretical bandwidth. The CPU itself provides 128 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which can be allocated to expansion slots, NVMe storage, and other peripherals. There is no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output. The socket is shared with other EPYC 9004 processors, meaning a motherboard designed for SP5 can accommodate a range of Genoa parts, offering a potential upgrade path within the same generation—provided the motherboard’s VRM and cooling can handle the TDP. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported; performance is determined by the stock clocks and the platform’s memory and PCIe configuration.

How It Compares

Intel Core i3-13100F: The EPYC 9374F scores 0.2% higher in average benchmark score. This negligible difference masks a fundamental disparity: the EPYC’s 32-core/64-thread configuration delivers far higher multi-core throughput, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 69,707, while the i3-13100F is a low-power desktop part. The average score is a poor proxy for comparing these two very different processors.

Intel Core i3-14100T: The EPYC 9374F is 0.3% ahead of the i3-14100T in average score. Again, the delta is tiny, but the EPYC’s multi-core capabilities are in a different league. The i3-14100T is a low-TDP chip aimed at compact desktops, whereas the EPYC is a full server processor.

AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE: The EPYC 9374F trails the Ryzen 3 8300GE by 0.7% in average score. The Ryzen 3 is a low-power desktop APU with integrated graphics; the EPYC has no integrated graphics and far higher core count. The EPYC’s advantage in multi-threaded and memory-bandwidth-intensive workloads is not captured by this average metric.

Intel Core i7-1255U: The EPYC 9374F is 0.7% behind the i7-1255U in average score. The i7-1255U is a mobile processor designed for ultrabooks, with a focus on efficiency. The EPYC’s 32 cores and 128 PCIe lanes are irrelevant to such a comparison; the average score simply reflects the balance of multi- and single-core tests.

FAQ

Q: What is the TDP of the AMD EPYC 9374F?

A: The TDP is 320 W.

Q: What socket does the EPYC 9374F use?

A: It uses AMD Socket SP5.

Q: How much L3 cache does the EPYC 9374F have?

A: It has 256 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Does it support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: It provides 128 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What is the process node and foundry?

A: It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC.