AMD

AMD EPYC 9275F

AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores

24
Cores
48
Threads
4.8
GHz Boost
320W
TDP
🛡️ECC Memory

AMD EPYC 9275F Specifications

⚙️

EPYC 9275F Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The AMD EPYC 9275F features 24 physical cores and 48 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
24
Threads
48
SMP CPUs
2
⏱️

EPYC 9275F Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in EPYC 9275F benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The EPYC 9275F by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
4.1 GHz
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
Multiplier
41x
💾

AMD's EPYC 9275F Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the EPYC 9275F processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The EPYC 9275F's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
🏗️

Zen 5 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The AMD EPYC 9275F is built on AMD's 4 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in EPYC 9275F incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Zen 5
Codename
Turin
Process Node
4 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
66,520 million
Die Size
8x 70.6 mm²
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))
🔢

Zen 5 Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The EPYC 9275F by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
AVX-512
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
🔌

EPYC 9275F Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The AMD EPYC 9275F has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 320W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
320W
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
🔧

AMD Socket SP5 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The EPYC 9275F uses the AMD Socket SP5 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
AMD Socket SP5
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Package
FC-LGA6096
DDR5

AMD Socket SP5 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the EPYC 9275F define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the EPYC 9275F determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Supported
📦

EPYC 9275F Product Information

Release and pricing details

The AMD EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the EPYC 9275F by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Oct 2024
Launch Price
$3439
Market
Server/Workstation
Status
Active
Part Number
100-000001144

EPYC 9275F Benchmark Scores

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource

Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how AMD EPYC 9275F performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. The R15 version remains useful for comparing against older hardware benchmarks. Higher scores directly correlate with faster render times in Cinema 4D and similar 3D applications.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore #34 of 1788
7,250
48%
Max: 14,978
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how AMD EPYC 9275F handles tasks that can't be parallelized across multiple cores. Games and many desktop applications still rely heavily on single-thread performance. A higher single-core score means snappier system responsiveness in everyday use.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore #34 of 1245
1,023
48%
Max: 2,114

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource

Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on AMD EPYC 9275F. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore #34 of 1788
30,209
48%
Max: 62,412
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of AMD EPYC 9275F. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore #34 of 1784
4,264
48%
Max: 8,811
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource

Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of AMD EPYC 9275F after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore #34 of 1788
71,927
48%
Max: 148,601
Compare with other CPUs

🏆 Top 5 Performers

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how AMD EPYC 9275F maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore #34 of 1788
10,154
48%
Max: 20,979
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_data_compressionSource

Data compression measures how fast AMD EPYC 9275F can compress and decompress files. This is important for archiving, backup software, and file transfer applications. Higher scores mean faster ZIP, RAR, and backup operations.

passmark_data_compression #32 of 528
1,212,560
22%
Max: 5,427,555
Compare with other CPUs

🏆 Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
5,427,555
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
4,680,013
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
4,517,407
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
3,929,890

📍 Nearby Performers

passmark_data_encryptionSource

Data encryption tests how fast AMD EPYC 9275F can encrypt information using AES and other algorithms. This is critical for security applications, VPNs, and secure communications.

passmark_data_encryption #38 of 528
62,664
20%
Max: 316,606
Compare with other CPUs

🏆 Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
316,606
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
296,808
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
284,927
#4 AMD EPYC 9754
231,891
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
229,447

passmark_extended_instructionsSource

Extended instructions tests AMD EPYC 9275F performance using SSE and AVX instruction sets. These specialized instructions accelerate multimedia, scientific, and AI workloads. Video encoding and image processing heavily utilize SIMD capabilities.

passmark_extended_instructions #27 of 528
94,889
24%
Max: 392,159
Compare with other CPUs

🏆 Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
392,159
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
314,798
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
303,321
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
280,477

passmark_find_prime_numbersSource

Find prime numbers tests AMD EPYC 9275F ability to identify primes through intensive calculations. This is a pure computational benchmark that stresses CPU arithmetic units without memory bottlenecks. The test reveals raw mathematical processing capability. Higher scores indicate superior arithmetic throughput independent of memory subsystem performance.

passmark_find_prime_numbers #17 of 528
991
41%
Max: 2,422
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_floating_point_mathSource

Floating point math measures how AMD EPYC 9275F handles decimal calculations critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering. This affects performance in CAD and physics simulations. Game physics engines also rely heavily on floating point operations.

passmark_floating_point_math #34 of 528
201,888
18%
Max: 1,141,430
Compare with other CPUs

🏆 Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,141,430
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
978,377
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
922,900
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
761,219
#5 AMD EPYC 9655P
710,260

passmark_integer_mathSource

Integer math tests how fast AMD EPYC 9275F processes whole number calculations essential for database operations and compression algorithms. This is fundamental to general computing performance.

passmark_integer_math #32 of 528
317,777
18%
Max: 1,806,439
Compare with other CPUs

🏆 Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,806,439
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
1,687,531
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
1,549,946
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
1,224,315

passmark_multithreadSource

PassMark multi-thread tests AMD EPYC 9275F across integer math, floating point, compression, and encryption using all cores. This provides an overall multi-threaded CPU performance score.

passmark_multithread #23 of 528
84,620
48%
Max: 174,825
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_physicsSource

Physics tests how AMD EPYC 9275F handles physics simulations used in games and engineering software. This measures performance in calculating object interactions and movements. Games with complex physics benefit from higher scores.

passmark_physics #18 of 528
12,089
43%
Max: 27,806
Compare with other CPUs

🏆 Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9755
27,806
#2 AMD EPYC 9655P
26,810
#3 AMD EPYC 9655
25,958
#4 AMD EPYC 9684X
24,686
#5 AMD EPYC 9575F
22,021

passmark_random_string_sortingSource

Random string sorting measures how fast AMD EPYC 9275F can organize text data. This is important for database operations, search indexing, and data processing applications. Applications that process large amounts of text benefit from higher scores.

passmark_random_string_sorting #28 of 528
144,037
24%
Max: 609,901
Compare with other CPUs

🏆 Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
609,901
#2 AMD EPYC 9755
571,185
#3 AMD EPYC 9845
538,060
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
468,975
#5 AMD EPYC 9655P
455,310

passmark_single_threadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 9275F across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use. Many legacy applications and games still depend heavily on single-thread speed.

passmark_single_thread #171 of 528
3,810
75%
Max: 5,097

passmark_singlethreadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 9275F across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications.

passmark_singlethread #172 of 528
3,810
75%
Max: 5,097

About AMD EPYC 9275F

The AMD EPYC 9275F, also known as the Turin-based 9275F, is a 24-core Zen 5 beast built on a 4nm process. With a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a turbo boost up to 4.80 GHz, this server-grade CPU is engineered for demanding, latency-sensitive workloads. Its 256MB of shared L3 cache feeds those 48 threads with immense data pools, making it a monster for tasks like real-time analytics, high-frequency trading, and scientific simulations. For users who need instantaneous results, this processor's raw frequency and architectural improvements translate to blistering single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. It's not just about cores; it's about delivering those cores with exceptional speed and efficiency. The SP5 socket platform provides the necessary foundation for its 320W TDP, requiring robust server cooling and power delivery. Expect this chip to chew through complex computational models and database queries with unprecedented alacrity.

Diving into the benchmarks, this EPYC Turin chip showcases its productivity prowess. Key synthetic scores highlight its balanced capabilities, from heavy number crunching to data sorting:

  1. Data Compression: A staggering 1,212,560 points, indicating phenomenal speed for data packing and I/O-bound tasks.
  2. Integer Math: 317,777 points, showcasing brute-force calculation power for financial modeling and code compilation.
  3. Floating Point Math: 201,888 points, proving its mettle for engineering simulations and scientific research.
  4. String Sorting & Extended Instructions: Scores of 144,037 and 94,889 points respectively, reflecting strong performance in database operations and optimized, modern workloads.
These figures paint a picture of a CPU that excels across a diverse professional workload spectrum, from AI inference to large-scale virtualization.

Cost-effectiveness for this 24-core powerhouse demands a holistic view of its $3439 launch price. For the right workload, the 9275F's performance-per-dollar can be compelling, especially when its high frequencies prevent costly bottlenecks. However, the total platform cost is significant, requiring investment in SP5 motherboards, enterprise-grade memory, and capable cooling solutions. When compared to lower-TDP or higher-core-count alternatives, this particular AMD EPYC processor carves its niche for applications where peak single-thread speed is non-negotiable within a multi-core framework. It's a strategic investment for businesses where computational speed directly translates to revenue or breakthrough insights, justifying the premium for its targeted performance envelope.

The Intel Equivalent of EPYC 9275F

Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-14500HX offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.

Intel Core i5-14500HX

Intel • 14 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular AMD EPYC 9275F Comparisons

See how the EPYC 9275F stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare EPYC 9275F with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs